AIM: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a major challenge in colorectal cancer surgery due to increased morbidity and mortality. Possible risk factors should be investigated differentially, distinguishing between rectal and colonic surgery in large-scale studies to avoid selection bias and confounding. METHOD: The incidence and risk factors associated with AL were analysed in an unselected nationwide prospective cohort of patient subjected to curative colonic cancer surgery with primary anastomosis and entered into The Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database between May 2001 and December 2008. RESULTS: AL occurred in 593 (6.4%) of 9333 patients. Laparoscopic surgery [odds ratio (OR) 1.34; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.70; P=0.03); left hemicolectomy (OR 2.02; 95% CI 1.50-2.72; P=0.01) or sigmoid colectomy (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.32-2.17; P=0.01); intra-operative blood loss (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.07; P=0.03); blood transfusion (OR 10.27; 95% CI 6.82-15.45; P<0.001) and male gender (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.12-1.75; P=0.02) were associated with AL in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The main finding that a laparoscopic approach was associated with an increased risk of AL should prompt close future monitoring. There was no evidence that centralization of surgery to high-volume hospitals reduced the rate of AL.
AIM: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a major challenge in colorectal cancer surgery due to increased morbidity and mortality. Possible risk factors should be investigated differentially, distinguishing between rectal and colonic surgery in large-scale studies to avoid selection bias and confounding. METHOD: The incidence and risk factors associated with AL were analysed in an unselected nationwide prospective cohort of patient subjected to curative colonic cancer surgery with primary anastomosis and entered into The Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database between May 2001 and December 2008. RESULTS: AL occurred in 593 (6.4%) of 9333 patients. Laparoscopic surgery [odds ratio (OR) 1.34; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.70; P=0.03); left hemicolectomy (OR 2.02; 95% CI 1.50-2.72; P=0.01) or sigmoid colectomy (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.32-2.17; P=0.01); intra-operative blood loss (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.07; P=0.03); blood transfusion (OR 10.27; 95% CI 6.82-15.45; P<0.001) and male gender (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.12-1.75; P=0.02) were associated with AL in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The main finding that a laparoscopic approach was associated with an increased risk of AL should prompt close future monitoring. There was no evidence that centralization of surgery to high-volume hospitals reduced the rate of AL.
Authors: Seung Yoon Yang; Jeonghee Han; Yoon Dae Han; Min Soo Cho; Hyuk Hur; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim; Byung Soh Min Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Marie Kjaer; Hrefna Kristjánsdóttir; Line Andersen; Anne-Marie Heegaard; Magnus S Ågren; Lars N Jorgensen Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2018-05-31 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Nikolaj Nerup; Linea Landgrebe Ring; Rune Broni Strandby; Charlotte Egeland; Morten Bo Søndergaard Svendsen; Jane Preuss Hasselby; Gro Linno Willemoe; Bolette Hartmann; Lars Bo Svendsen; Michael Patrick Achiam Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Mari Nanna Oines; Peter-Martin Krarup; Lars Nannestad Jorgensen; Magnus Sven Agren Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-09-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Gokhan Cipe; Fatma Umit Malya; Mustafa Hasbahceci; Pinar Atukeren; Nur Buyukpinarbasili; Oğuzhan Karatepe; Mahmut Muslumanoglu Journal: Int J Clin Exp Med Date: 2014-05-15
Authors: Jachym Rosendorf; Marketa Klicova; Lenka Cervenkova; Richard Palek; Jana Horakova; Andrea Klapstova; Petr Hosek; Vladimira Moulisova; Lukas Bednar; Vaclav Tegl; Ondrej Brzon; Zbynek Tonar; Vladislav Treska; David Lukas; Vaclav Liska Journal: In Vivo Date: 2021 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: S Pucciarelli; A Chiappetta; G Giacomazzo; A Barina; N Gennaro; M Rebonato; D Nitti; M Saugo Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2015-11-16 Impact factor: 3.781