Literature DB >> 22563812

Quantitative approaches to detect donor and passage differences in adipogenic potential and clonogenicity in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

Jessica Lo Surdo1, Steven R Bauer.   

Abstract

Bone marrow-derived multipotent stromal cells (MSCs), also known as mesenchymal stem cells, have great promise due to their capacity for tri-lineage differentiation and immunosuppressive properties, which allows for their allogeneic use and ultimately may allow for treatment of many diseases. MSCs will require extensive expansion and passaging to obtain cells in sufficient numbers necessary for cell therapies. MSCs from many donors could potentially be used. Because of this, there is a need to understand the role of passaging and donor differences on differentiation capacity using quantitative approaches. Here, we evaluated MSCs from two donors (noted as PCBM1632 and PCBM1641 by the manufacturer) at tissue culture passages 3, 5, and 7. We used a colony forming unit (CFU) assay and limiting dilution to quantify clonogenicity and precursor frequency during adipogenesis, and quantitative real-time-polymerase chain reaction for adipogenic markers to evaluate changes on a gene expression level. Further, we observed changes in cell size, and we sorted small and large populations to evaluate size-related adipogenic potential. While the adipogenic precursor frequency of ∼1 in 76 cells remained similar through passages for cells from PCBM1641, we found a large decrease in the adipogenic potential of MSCs from PCBM1632, with 1 in 2035 cells being capable of differentiating into an adipocyte at passage 7. MSCs from both donors showed an increase in cell diameter with increasing passage, which correlates with a decrease in clonogenicity by CFU analysis. We also measured adipose lineage gene expression following induction of adipocyte differentiation. Expression of these genes decreased with passage number for MSCs from PCBM1632 and correlated with the decrease in adipogenic potential by passage 7. In contrast, MSCs from PCBM1641 showed increased expression of these genes with increasing passage. We have shown that several quantitative assays can detect differences in MSC differentiation capacity, clonogenicity, and cell size between donors and passages. These quantitative methods are useful to assess the quality of MSCs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22563812      PMCID: PMC3483050          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2011.0736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods        ISSN: 1937-3384            Impact factor:   3.056


  65 in total

Review 1.  Muscle-derived stem cells: characterization and potential for cell-mediated therapy.

Authors:  B M Deasy; R J Jankowski; J Huard
Journal:  Blood Cells Mol Dis       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

3.  Identification of a subpopulation of rapidly self-renewing and multipotential adult stem cells in colonies of human marrow stromal cells.

Authors:  D C Colter; I Sekiya; D J Prockop
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Osteogenesis and bone-marrow-derived cells.

Authors:  M W Long
Journal:  Blood Cells Mol Dis       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Muscle-derived stem cells.

Authors:  R J Jankowski; B M Deasy; J Huard
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.250

6.  Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit and stimulate mixed lymphocyte cultures and mitogenic responses independently of the major histocompatibility complex.

Authors:  K Le Blanc; L Tammik; B Sundberg; S E Haynesworth; O Ringdén
Journal:  Scand J Immunol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.487

7.  Chondrocytic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells sequentially exposed to transforming growth factor-beta1 in monolayer and insulin-like growth factor-I in a three-dimensional matrix.

Authors:  A A Worster; B D Brower-Toland; L A Fortier; S J Bent; J Williams; A J Nixon
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Isolation and characterization of rapidly self-renewing stem cells from cultures of human marrow stromal cells.

Authors:  D J Prockop; I Sekiya; D C Colter
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.414

9.  Temporal gene expression changes during adipogenesis in human mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Takanori Nakamura; Satoshi Shiojima; Yuichi Hirai; Takehisa Iwama; Nobutomo Tsuruzoe; Akira Hirasawa; Susumu Katsuma; Gozoh Tsujimoto
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  Human mesenchymal stem cells as an in vitro model for human adipogenesis.

Authors:  Lenka Janderová; Michele McNeil; Angela N Murrell; Randall L Mynatt; Steven R Smith
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2003-01
View more
  35 in total

1.  Automated microscopy as a quantitative method to measure differences in adipogenic differentiation in preparations of human mesenchymal stromal cells.

Authors:  Jessica L Lo Surdo; Bryan A Millis; Steven R Bauer
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 5.414

Review 2.  Biomaterial strategies for stem cell maintenance during in vitro expansion.

Authors:  Xiang-Zhen Yan; Jeroen J J P van den Beucken; Sanne K Both; Pi-Shan Yang; John A Jansen; Fang Yang
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 6.389

3.  Mesenchymal stem cell population derived from human pluripotent stem cells displays potent immunomodulatory and therapeutic properties.

Authors:  Erin A Kimbrel; Nicholas A Kouris; Gregory J Yavanian; Jianlin Chu; Yu Qin; Ann Chan; Ram P Singh; Deborah McCurdy; Lynn Gordon; Ralph D Levinson; Robert Lanza
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 4.  Stromal cells and stem cells in clinical bone regeneration.

Authors:  Warren L Grayson; Bruce A Bunnell; Elizabeth Martin; Trivia Frazier; Ben P Hung; Jeffrey M Gimble
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 43.330

5.  Automated enumeration and viability measurement of canine stromal vascular fraction cells using fluorescence-based image cytometry method.

Authors:  Leo Li-Ying Chan; Donald A Cohen; Dmitry Kuksin; Benjamin D Paradis; Jean Qiu
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Quantitative Multimodal Evaluation of Passaging Human Neural Crest Stem Cells for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.

Authors:  Jian Du; Huanwen Chen; Kailiang Zhou; Xiaofeng Jia
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.739

7.  Chromosomal stability of mesenchymal stromal cells during in vitro culture.

Authors:  Brian G Stultz; Kathleen McGinnis; Elaine E Thompson; Jessica L Lo Surdo; Steven R Bauer; Deborah A Hursh
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 5.414

8.  Cell Mimicking Microparticles Influence the Organization, Growth, and Mechanophenotype of Stem Cell Spheroids.

Authors:  Nicholas R Labriola; Jessica S Sadick; Jeffrey R Morgan; Edith Mathiowitz; Eric M Darling
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Fabricating polyacrylamide microbeads by inverse emulsification to mimic the size and elasticity of living cells.

Authors:  Nicholas R Labriola; Edith Mathiowitz; Eric M Darling
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 6.843

10.  In vitro cytokine licensing induces persistent permissive chromatin at the Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase promoter.

Authors:  Yazmin I Rovira Gonzalez; Patrick J Lynch; Elaine E Thompson; Brian G Stultz; Deborah A Hursh
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 5.414

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.