Literature DB >> 29671154

Cell Mimicking Microparticles Influence the Organization, Growth, and Mechanophenotype of Stem Cell Spheroids.

Nicholas R Labriola1, Jessica S Sadick2, Jeffrey R Morgan1,2,3, Edith Mathiowitz1,2,3, Eric M Darling4,5,6,7.   

Abstract

Substrate stiffness is known to alter cell behavior and drive stem cell differentiation, though most research in this area has been restricted to traditional, two-dimensional culture systems rather than more physiologically relevant, three-dimensional (3D) platforms. In this study, we utilized polymer-based, cell mimicking microparticles (CMMPs) to deliver distinct, stable mechanical cues to human adipose derived stem cells in 3D spheroid culture to examine changes in adipogenic differentiation response and mechanophenotype. After 21 days of adipogenic induction, spheroids containing CMMPs (composite spheroids) stiffened in accordance with CMMP elasticity such that spheroids containing the stiffest, ~ 10 kPa, CMMPs were over 27% stiffer than those incorporating the most compliant, ~ 0.25 kPa CMMPs. Adipogenically induced, cell-only spheroids were over 180% larger and 50% more compliant than matched controls. Interestingly, composite spheroids cultured without chemical induction factors dissociated when presented with CMMPs stiffer than ~ 1 kPa, while adipogenic induction factors mitigated this behavior. Gene expression for PPARG and FABP4 were upregulated more than 45-fold in adipogenically induced samples compared to controls but were unaffected by CMMP elasticity, attributed to insufficient cell-CMMP contacts throughout the composite spheroid. In summary, mechanically tuned CMMPs influenced whole-spheroid mechanophenotype and stability but minimally affected differentiation response.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D spheroid culture; Adipogenesis; Atomic force microscopy (AFM); Elastic and viscoelastic properties; Hyper-compliant microparticles; Self-assembly; Stem cell differentiation; Tissue engineering

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29671154      PMCID: PMC6039261          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-018-2028-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  38 in total

1.  Modulus-driven differentiation of marrow stromal cells in 3D scaffolds that is independent of myosin-based cytoskeletal tension.

Authors:  Sapun H Parekh; Kaushik Chatterjee; Sheng Lin-Gibson; Nicole M Moore; Marcus T Cicerone; Marian F Young; Carl G Simon
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Scaffold-free culture of mesenchymal stem cell spheroids in suspension preserves multilineage potential.

Authors:  Priya R Baraniak; Todd C McDevitt
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 5.249

3.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion.

Authors:  Tony Yeung; Penelope C Georges; Lisa A Flanagan; Beatrice Marg; Miguelina Ortiz; Makoto Funaki; Nastaran Zahir; Wenyu Ming; Valerie Weaver; Paul A Janmey
Journal:  Cell Motil Cytoskeleton       Date:  2005-01

4.  A thin-layer model for viscoelastic, stress-relaxation testing of cells using atomic force microscopy: do cell properties reflect metastatic potential?

Authors:  Eric M Darling; Stefan Zauscher; Joel A Block; Farshid Guilak
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Short-term spheroid formation enhances the regenerative capacity of adipose-derived stem cells by promoting stemness, angiogenesis, and chemotaxis.

Authors:  Nai-Chen Cheng; Szu-Yu Chen; Jia-Rong Li; Tai-Horng Young
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 6.940

6.  The performance of human mesenchymal stem cells encapsulated in cell-degradable polymer-peptide hydrogels.

Authors:  Sarah B Anderson; Chien-Chi Lin; Donna V Kuntzler; Kristi S Anseth
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Stiffening of human mesenchymal stem cell spheroid microenvironments induced by incorporation of gelatin microparticles.

Authors:  Priya R Baraniak; Marissa T Cooke; Rabbia Saeed; Melissa A Kinney; Krista M Fridley; Todd C McDevitt
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2012-03-03

8.  Scaffold-free three-dimensional cell culture utilizing micromolded nonadhesive hydrogels.

Authors:  Anthony P Napolitano; Dylan M Dean; Alan J Man; Jacquelyn Youssef; Don N Ho; Adam P Rago; Matthew P Lech; Jeffrey R Morgan
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.993

9.  Harnessing traction-mediated manipulation of the cell/matrix interface to control stem-cell fate.

Authors:  Nathaniel Huebsch; Praveen R Arany; Angelo S Mao; Dmitry Shvartsman; Omar A Ali; Sidi A Bencherif; José Rivera-Feliciano; David J Mooney
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 43.841

10.  Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity.

Authors:  Ovijit Chaudhuri; Luo Gu; Darinka Klumpers; Max Darnell; Sidi A Bencherif; James C Weaver; Nathaniel Huebsch; Hong-Pyo Lee; Evi Lippens; Georg N Duda; David J Mooney
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 43.841

View more
  2 in total

1.  Force sensors for measuring microenvironmental forces during mesenchymal condensation.

Authors:  Robert A Gutierrez; Wenqiang Fang; Haneesh Kesari; Eric M Darling
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Droplet microfluidic devices for organized stem cell differentiation into germ cells: capabilities and challenges.

Authors:  Reyhaneh Sadat Hayaei Tehrani; Mohammad Amin Hajari; Zeynab Ghorbaninejad; Fereshteh Esfandiari
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2021-11-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.