OBJECTIVE: Randomized comparisons of acceptance-based treatments with traditional cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for anxiety disorders are lacking. To address this gap, we compared acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) to CBT for heterogeneous anxiety disorders. METHOD: One hundred twenty-eight individuals (52% female, mean age = 38, 33% minority) with 1 or more DSM-IV anxiety disorders began treatment following randomization to CBT or ACT; both treatments included behavioral exposure. Assessments at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and 6- and 12-month follow-up measured anxiety-specific (principal disorder Clinical Severity Ratings [CSRs], Anxiety Sensitivity Index, Penn State Worry Questionnaire, Fear Questionnaire avoidance) and non-anxiety-specific (Quality of Life Index [QOLI], Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-16 [AAQ]) outcomes. Treatment adherence, therapist competency ratings, treatment credibility, and co-occurring mood and anxiety disorders were investigated. RESULTS:CBT and ACT improved similarly across all outcomes from pre- to post-treatment. During follow-up, ACT showed steeper linear CSR improvements than CBT (p < .05, d = 1.26), and at 12-month follow-up, ACT showed lower CSRs than CBT among completers (p < .05, d = 1.10). At 12-month follow-up, ACT reported higher AAQ than CBT (p = .08, d = 0.42; completers: p < .05, d = 0.56), whereas CBT reported higher QOLI than ACT (p < .05, d = 0.42). Attrition and comorbidity improvements were similar; ACT used more non-study psychotherapy at 6-month follow-up. Therapist adherence and competency were good; treatment credibility was higher in CBT. CONCLUSIONS: Overall improvement was similar between ACT and CBT, indicating that ACT is a highly viable treatment for anxiety disorders. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved).
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Randomized comparisons of acceptance-based treatments with traditional cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for anxiety disorders are lacking. To address this gap, we compared acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) to CBT for heterogeneous anxiety disorders. METHOD: One hundred twenty-eight individuals (52% female, mean age = 38, 33% minority) with 1 or more DSM-IV anxiety disorders began treatment following randomization to CBT or ACT; both treatments included behavioral exposure. Assessments at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and 6- and 12-month follow-up measured anxiety-specific (principal disorder Clinical Severity Ratings [CSRs], Anxiety Sensitivity Index, Penn State Worry Questionnaire, Fear Questionnaire avoidance) and non-anxiety-specific (Quality of Life Index [QOLI], Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-16 [AAQ]) outcomes. Treatment adherence, therapist competency ratings, treatment credibility, and co-occurring mood and anxiety disorders were investigated. RESULTS: CBT and ACT improved similarly across all outcomes from pre- to post-treatment. During follow-up, ACT showed steeper linear CSR improvements than CBT (p < .05, d = 1.26), and at 12-month follow-up, ACT showed lower CSRs than CBT among completers (p < .05, d = 1.10). At 12-month follow-up, ACT reported higher AAQ than CBT (p = .08, d = 0.42; completers: p < .05, d = 0.56), whereas CBT reported higher QOLI than ACT (p < .05, d = 0.42). Attrition and comorbidity improvements were similar; ACT used more non-study psychotherapy at 6-month follow-up. Therapist adherence and competency were good; treatment credibility was higher in CBT. CONCLUSIONS: Overall improvement was similar between ACT and CBT, indicating that ACT is a highly viable treatment for anxiety disorders. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Michelle G Newman; Louis G Castonguay; Thomas D Borkovec; Aaron J Fisher; James F Boswell; Lauren E Szkodny; Samuel S Nordberg Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2011-04
Authors: Julie Loebach Wetherell; Niloofar Afari; Catherine R Ayers; Jill A Stoddard; Joshua Ruberg; John T Sorrell; Lin Liu; Andrew J Petkus; Steven R Thorp; Alexander Kraft; Thomas L Patterson Journal: Behav Ther Date: 2010-11-05
Authors: Michelle G Craske; Murray B Stein; Greer Sullivan; Cathy Sherbourne; Alexander Bystritsky; Raphael D Rose; Ariel J Lang; Stacy Welch; Laura Campbell-Sills; Daniela Golinelli; Peter Roy-Byrne Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2011-04
Authors: Sarah E Woolf-King; Alan Z Sheinfil; Jacklyn D Babowich; Bob Siedle-Khan; Amanda Loitsch; Stephen A Maisto Journal: Alcohol Treat Q Date: 2018-11-08
Authors: Matthew W Gallagher; Colleen A Phillips; Johann D'Souza; Angela Richardson; Laura J Long; James F Boswell; Todd J Farchione; David H Barlow Journal: Psychotherapy (Chic) Date: 2020-02-06
Authors: Michelle G Craske; Andrea N Niles; Lisa J Burklund; Kate B Wolitzky-Taylor; Jennifer C Plumb Vilardaga; Joanna J Arch; Darby E Saxbe; Matthew D Lieberman Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2014-07-07