OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of thyroid incidentalomas detected by time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography (TRMRA) and to evaluate their clinical significance by using an ultrasonographic (US) and cytologic correlation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 2010 consecutive TRMRA examinations performed at our institution between August 2006 and April 2010. The TRMRA findings of thyroid incidentalomas were analyzed according to location, size, as well as vascularity, and were correlated with the US findings and cytologic results. Each nodule was classified as suspiciously malignant, indeterminate or probably benign according to the US criteria recommended by the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology. RESULTS: A total of 102 incidentalomas were detected in 90 of 2010 patients (5%). TRMRA showed homogenous hypervascularity in 48 (47%), inhomogeneous hypervascularity in 46 (45%), and hypovascularity in 8 (8%) thyroid nodules. At follow-up study, out of 26 patients with 30 incidentalomas on TRMRA, 27 nodules were identified on US. Of the 27 nodules, 24 (89%) nodule were classified as indeterminate, two (7%) as probably benign, and one (4%) as suspiciously malignant. Among the 16 nodules with available cytopathologic results, 14 (82%) were benign, one (6%) was indeterminate, and one (6%) was malignant. CONCLUSION: Thyroid incidentalomas are found in 5% of TRMRA examinations. Although their presence does not necessarily indicate malignancy, nonspecific findings of detected incidentalomas on TRMRA require further evaluation by US.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of thyroid incidentalomas detected by time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography (TRMRA) and to evaluate their clinical significance by using an ultrasonographic (US) and cytologic correlation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 2010 consecutive TRMRA examinations performed at our institution between August 2006 and April 2010. The TRMRA findings of thyroid incidentalomas were analyzed according to location, size, as well as vascularity, and were correlated with the US findings and cytologic results. Each nodule was classified as suspiciously malignant, indeterminate or probably benign according to the US criteria recommended by the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology. RESULTS: A total of 102 incidentalomas were detected in 90 of 2010 patients (5%). TRMRA showed homogenous hypervascularity in 48 (47%), inhomogeneous hypervascularity in 46 (45%), and hypovascularity in 8 (8%) thyroid nodules. At follow-up study, out of 26 patients with 30 incidentalomas on TRMRA, 27 nodules were identified on US. Of the 27 nodules, 24 (89%) nodule were classified as indeterminate, two (7%) as probably benign, and one (4%) as suspiciously malignant. Among the 16 nodules with available cytopathologic results, 14 (82%) were benign, one (6%) was indeterminate, and one (6%) was malignant. CONCLUSION:Thyroid incidentalomas are found in 5% of TRMRA examinations. Although their presence does not necessarily indicate malignancy, nonspecific findings of detected incidentalomas on TRMRA require further evaluation by US.
Entities:
Keywords:
Incidentaloma; Magnetic resonance angiography; Neoplasm; Thyroid; Ultrasonography; ime-resolved
Authors: Michael Markl; Markus Uhl; Oliver Wieben; Thomas Ness; Mathias Langer; Jürgen Hennig; Thorsten A Bley Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Derek G Lohan; Fatemeh Barkhordarian; Roya Saleh; Mayil Krishnam; Noriko Salamon; Stefan G Ruehm; J Paul Finn Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: C M Pacella; R Guglielmi; R Fabbrini; A Bianchini; R Rinaldi; C Panunzi; S Pacella; A Crescenzi; E Papini Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res Date: 1998-03
Authors: Kambiz Nael; Henrik J Michaely; Pablo Villablanca; Noriko Salamon; Gerhard Laub; J Paul Finn Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Bryan K Chan; Terry S Desser; I Ross McDougall; Ronald J Weigel; R Brooke Jeffrey Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Won-Jin Moon; Jung Hwan Baek; So Lyung Jung; Dong Wook Kim; Eun Kyung Kim; Ji Young Kim; Jin Young Kwak; Jeong Hyun Lee; Joon Hyung Lee; Young Hen Lee; Dong Gyu Na; Jeong Seon Park; Sun Won Park Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2011-01-03 Impact factor: 3.500