Literature DB >> 15798069

Informatics in radiology (infoRAD): survey of personal digital assistant use in radiology.

William W Boonn1, Adam E Flanders.   

Abstract

There has been widespread adoption of personal digital assistants (PDAs) within medicine in recent years. However, information on the prevalence and usage of these devices among radiologists is limited. A survey was designed and mailed to randomly selected members of the Radiological Society of North America to determine the percentage of PDA users, their use patterns, and the types of applications that they would like to see in the future. The use patterns of attending radiologists were compared with those of trainees (residents and fellows). Overall usage was also compared with the relevant findings in two surveys of internal medicine users. It was found that slightly less than one-half of respondents used PDAs on a daily basis, a finding that was comparable to that in the internal medicine surveys. However, less than one-quarter of PDA users had radiology-specific applications installed on their devices, whereas a greater percentage of internal medicine users had software such as drug databases and clinical references on their PDAs. Radiology trainees had a higher rate of both PDA ownership and radiology application usage than did attending radiologists. It is likely that, as PDA hardware becomes more powerful, with higher display resolution, better wireless networking capabilities, and greater memory capacity, PDA ownership as well as radiology application usage will increase. (c) RSNA, 2005.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15798069     DOI: 10.1148/rg.252045173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  6 in total

1.  Technologies for image distribution in hospitals.

Authors:  Elmar Kotter; Tobias Baumann; Dieter Jäger; Mathias Langer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  The iPad tablet computer for mobile on-call radiology diagnosis? Auditing discrepancy in CT and MRI reporting.

Authors:  Sindhu John; Angeline C C Poh; Tchoyoson C C Lim; Elizabeth H Y Chan; Le Roy Chong
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  The reliability of tablet computers in depicting maxillofacial radiographic landmarks.

Authors:  Aditya Tadinada; Mina Mahdian; Sonam Sheth; Taranpreet K Chandhoke; Aadarsh Gopalakrishna; Anitha Potluri; Sumit Yadav
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2015-09-09

4.  Diagnostic efficacy of handheld devices for emergency radiologic consultation.

Authors:  Rachel J Toomey; John T Ryan; Mark F McEntee; Michael G Evanoff; Dev P Chakraborty; Jonathan P McNulty; David J Manning; Edel M Thomas; Patrick C Brennan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Who's using PDAs? Estimates of PDA use by health care providers: a systematic review of surveys.

Authors:  Chantelle Garritty; Khaled El Emam
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Mobile NBM - Android medical mobile application designed to help in learning how to identify the different regions of interest in the brain's white matter.

Authors:  Iskander Sánchez-Rola; Begoña García Zapirain
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.