Literature DB >> 22559314

Effects of genotype and environment on the contents of betaine, choline, and trigonelline in cereal grains.

Delia-Irina Corol1, Catherine Ravel, Mariann Raksegi, Zoltan Bedo, Gilles Charmet, Michael H Beale, Peter R Shewry, Jane L Ward.   

Abstract

This study examined the environmental and genetic variation in methyl donor contents and compositions of 200 cereal genotypes. Glycine betaine, choline, and trigonelline contents were determined by (1)H NMR, and significant differences were observed between cereal types (G) and across harvesting years and growing locations (E). Glycine betaine was the most abundant methyl donor in all of the 200 lines grown on a single site, and concentrations ranged from 0.43 ± 0.09 mg/g dm in oats to 2.57 ± 0.25 mg/g dm in diploid Einkorn varieties. In bread wheat genotypes there was a 3-fold difference in glycine betaine content. Choline contents, in the same lines, were substantially lower, and mean concentrations ranged from 0.17 mg/g dm in oats to 0.27 mg/g dm in durum wheat. Trigonelline was by far the least abundant of the methyl donors studied. Despite this, however, there were large differences between cereal types. Twenty-six wheat genotypes were grown in additional years at four European locations. The average glycine betaine content was highest in grains grown in Hungary and lowest in those grown in the United Kingdom. Across the six environments, there was a 3.8-fold difference in glycine betaine content. Glycine betaine levels, although moderately heritable (0.36), were found to be the most susceptible to the environmental conditions. Free choline concentrations were less variable across genotypes, but heritability of this component was the lowest of all methyl donor components (0.25) and showed a high G × E interaction. Trigonelline showed the most variation due to genotype. Heritability of this metabolite was the highest (0.59), but given that it is at a very low concentration in wheat, it is probably not attractive to plant breeders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22559314     DOI: 10.1021/jf3008794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  9 in total

1.  Differentially penalized regression to predict agronomic traits from metabolites and markers in wheat.

Authors:  Jane Ward; Mariann Rakszegi; Zoltán Bedő; Peter R Shewry; Ian Mackay
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.797

2.  (1)H-NMR screening for the high-throughput determination of genotype and environmental effects on the content of asparagine in wheat grain.

Authors:  Delia I Corol; Catherine Ravel; Marianna Rakszegi; Gilles Charmet; Zoltan Bedo; Michael H Beale; Peter R Shewry; Jane L Ward
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 9.803

Review 3.  The contribution of wheat to human diet and health.

Authors:  Peter R Shewry; Sandra J Hey
Journal:  Food Energy Secur       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.109

4.  Defining genetic and chemical diversity in wheat grain by 1H-NMR spectroscopy of polar metabolites.

Authors:  Peter R Shewry; Delia I Corol; Huw D Jones; Michael H Beale; Jane L Ward
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 5.914

Review 5.  Processing of oat: the impact on oat's cholesterol lowering effect.

Authors:  Myriam M-L Grundy; Anthony Fardet; Susan M Tosh; Gillian T Rich; Peter J Wilde
Journal:  Food Funct       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 5.396

Review 6.  Betaine in Cereal Grains and Grain-Based Products.

Authors:  Bojana Filipčev; Jovana Kojić; Jelena Krulj; Marija Bodroža-Solarov; Nebojša Ilić
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2018-03-29

7.  Comprehensive profiling of semi-polar phytochemicals in whole wheat grains (Triticum aestivum) using liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Leslie Tais; Hartwig Schulz; Christoph Böttcher
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 4.290

Review 8.  Do modern types of wheat have lower quality for human health?

Authors:  P R Shewry; K L Hassall; H Grausgruber; A A M Andersson; A-M Lampi; V Piironen; M Rakszegi; J L Ward; A Lovegrove
Journal:  Nutr Bull       Date:  2020-09-22

9.  Using NMR-Based Metabolomics to Evaluate Postprandial Urinary Responses Following Consumption of Minimally Processed Wheat Bran or Wheat Aleurone by Men and Women.

Authors:  Ramandeep Garg; Lorraine Brennan; Ruth K Price; Julie M W Wallace; J J Strain; Mike J Gibney; Peter R Shewry; Jane L Ward; Lalit Garg; Robert W Welch
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 5.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.