Literature DB >> 22558245

Molecular systematic of three species of Oithona (Copepoda, Cyclopoida) from the Atlantic Ocean: comparative analysis using 28S rDNA.

Georgina D Cepeda1, Leocadio Blanco-Bercial, Ann Bucklin, Corina M Berón, María D Viñas.   

Abstract

Species of Oithona (Copepoda, Cyclopoida) are highly abundant, ecologically important, and widely distributed throughout the world oceans. Although there are valid and detailed descriptions of the species, routine species identifications remain challenging due to their small size, subtle morphological diagnostic traits, and the description of geographic forms or varieties. This study examined three species of Oithona (O. similis, O. atlantica and O. nana) occurring in the Argentine sector of the South Atlantic Ocean based on DNA sequence variation of a 575 base-pair region of 28S rDNA, with comparative analysis of these species from other North and South Atlantic regions. DNA sequence variation clearly resolved and discriminated the species, and revealed low levels of intraspecific variation among North and South Atlantic populations of each species. The 28S rDNA region was thus shown to provide an accurate and reliable means of identifying the species throughout the sampled domain. Analysis of 28S rDNA variation for additional species collected throughout the global ocean will be useful to accurately characterize biogeographical distributions of the species and to examine phylogenetic relationships among them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22558245      PMCID: PMC3338805          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Biogeography and Ecology of the Species

Among the small size copepods, the family Oithonidae [1] is recognized as one of the most abundant groups in the ocean [2]. The abundance, biomass and ecological role of Oithona spp. have been examined in recent studies [3]–[5]. The genus has been the subject of concerted and expert taxonomic analysis and detailed descriptions of the species are in place [6]–[8]. However, routine identification of species has remained challenging due to the small body size and subtle mophological differences among species [6] and descriptions of geographic forms or varieties of widely-distributed species [9]. The Oithona species examined in this study are important components of the Argentine Sea - a region of the Southwest Atlantic Ocean -, as well as of the North Atlantic Ocean [5], [10]–[12]. Over the Argentine continental shelf, the occurrence of O. similis Claus 1866 [13] syn. O. helgolandica [14], [15], O. atlantica [16] and O. nana [17] has been extensively cited [18]–[20]. These species are abundant, ecologically-important, and geographically-widespread; their numerical dominance was recently highlighted [21], [22]. Oithona similis occurs over the Argentine continental shelf between 34° and 55° S [18], [23]–[25]. It is broadly distributed from the tropics to high latitudes of the Atlantic [10], [18], [23]–[25] and Pacific Oceans [8]; in the Indian Ocean, and Mediterranean and Red Seas [26]. Although O. similis is a widespread species, multivariate analyses of community structure in the Argentine Sea reveal that the species reaches its maximum densities in cold shelf waters [20], [27]. Oithona atlantica also has a broad biogeographical distribution throughout both the North and South Atlantic Oceans, occurring over wide ranges in salinity (24–26 ppt and 34–36 ppt) and temperature (8–19°C) [18]. Despite such wide ecological tolerances, this is the least abundant Oithona species in the Argentine Sea [24], [28], but quite common throughout the Strait of Magellan [18]. It occurs in the northern North and eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean, Bearing Sea and Sea of Japan [8]. It is also found in the Sub-Antarctic and Antarctic waters, as well as the Mediterranean Sea [8]. In Argentine waters O. nana is found throughout the year between 34° and 45°S. The species is an important component of the coastal species assemblage [27], [28], and it is potentially important as prey for fish larvae [29], [30]. It is also found in tropical and subtropical waters of the Atlantic Ocean [31], [32] as well as in the Mediterranean Sea [33], and the Pacific and Indian Oceans [8].

28S rDNA as a Taxonomic Marker

Although molecular approaches have been applied exhaustively to copepods to ensure accurate taxonomic identification of species, little information is available for cyclopoid copepods, especially for species of Oithona. DNA sequence variation of the large-subunit (28S) rRNA gene has been used extensively to examine phylogenetic relationships among marine invertebrate species, including cnidarians [34], annelids [35], nematodes [36], molluscs [37], and echinoderms [38], among others. The broad application of this gene as a character for taxonomic identification of species with subtle or ambiguous morphological characteristics makes it a useful marker to be employed for species of the cyclopoid copepod Oithona. The relationships among Oithona species, including O. similis, O. atlantica and O. nana, have been studied for the Pacific and Indian Oceans [8]. These morphological analyses included forty five structural characters and suggested that O. atlantica and O. similis are more closely related to each other than to O. nana [8]. Here we analyze DNA sequences for a 575 base-pair (bp) region of the 28S rRNA gene and characterize patterns of variation within and among three Oithona species occurring in the South and North Atlantic Oceans.

Methods

Ethics Statement

No specific permits were required for the described field study, and no endangered or protected species were included in this study.

Collection of Samples

Zooplankton samples collected from regions across the North and South Atlantic Oceans (Figure 1, Table 1), preserved immediately and stored in 95% undenatured ethanol, as described by Bucklin [39]. A total of 150 oithonid copepods were identified to species level following [24], [25], using a Leica D1000 inverted microscope. The following specimens were removed and prepared for molecular analysis: O. similis (108 individuals), O. nana (19 individuals) and O. atlantica (23 individuals). Specimens from O. similis and O. nana type localities were also included in the molecular analysis.
Figure 1

Collection sites and number of specimens in each site for each Oithona species.

Specimens of O. similis sampled (in blue); O. nana (green); O. atlantica (red). Explanation of abbreviations for the collection sites are given in Table I and the text.

Table 1

Sample sites, latitude, longitude, location code, sample size (N), sequence diversity (h), standarized sequence diversity (Hk) and number of kind sequences in each population of O. similis, O. nana and O. atlantica collected for this study from the Atlantic Ocean.

SpeciesSample siteLatitudeLongitudeLocation CodeNhHk
O. similis Gulf of Maine, US43°10′4.8″N70°25′4.8″WGM190.510.52
Bay of Biscay, Spain43°42′N6° 9′WBB160.240.24
Iceland64°20.15′N27°WIC200.680.72
Mid Atlantic Bight, US38°16.3′N74°24.4′WMAB210.740.72
Península Valdés, Argentina42°31′4.8″S63°12′WPV180.810.82
Bahía Grande, Argentina51°S67°WBG110.340.35
Río de la Plata, Argentina36°4′48″S54°32′2.4″WRdP1N/AN/A
Helgoland Sea, Germany*54°10′57″N7°53′EHE1N/AN/A
Torres, Brazil29°40′4.8″S49°30′WBR1N/AN/A
108
O. nana Mid Atlantic Bight, US38°16.3′N74°24.4′WMAB110.560.56
El Rincón, Argentina39°38′2.4″S61°6′3.6″W6AR30.000.00
Península Valdés, Argentina42°31′4.8″S63°12′WPV40.500.50
Gulf of Naples, Italy*40°50′N14°15′ENAP1N/AN/A
19
O. atlantica Bay of Biscay, Spain43°42′N6° 9′WBB21.001.00
Mid Atlantic Bight, US38°16.3′N74°24.4′WMAB120.410.41
Rio de la Plata, Argentina36°4′48″S54°32′2.4″WRdP40.000.00
Argentina45°15′S62°30′3,6″W7AR20.000.00
Argentina43°31′4.8″S61°23′2.4″W8AR30.000.00
23

Total sample size for each species is indicated in bold, samples from type locality are indicated by asterisk. N/A: not applicable.

Collection sites and number of specimens in each site for each Oithona species.

Specimens of O. similis sampled (in blue); O. nana (green); O. atlantica (red). Explanation of abbreviations for the collection sites are given in Table I and the text. Total sample size for each species is indicated in bold, samples from type locality are indicated by asterisk. N/A: not applicable.

Molecular Analysis

DNA was extracted from individual identified specimens using the QIAGEN Dneasy tissue Kit. The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) was used to amplify a 800 bp fragment of the D1–D2 region of the large subunit (28S) ribosomal DNA (rDNA) gene using primers 28SF1: 5′-GCGGAGGAAAAGAAACTAAC-3′ and 28SR1: 5′-GCATAGTTTCACCATCTTTCGGG-3′ [34]. PCR amplifications were performed in a total volume of 25 µl including 5 µl of 5X Green GoTaq® Flexi Buffer, 2.5 µl of 25 mM MgCl2, 1 µl of dNTPs (final concentration 0.2 mM each), 1 µl of each primer (10 µM), 0.75 units of GoTaq® Flexi DNA Polymerase (Promega) and 3 µl of the DNA template solution. The PCR protocol was: 4 min initial denaturation step at 94°C; 35 cycles of 40 s denaturation step at 94°C, 40 s annealing at 50°C, and 90 s extension at 72°C; and a final extension step of 15 min at 72°C. Several sets of PCR primers for various genes were tested, but most did not amplified consistently. The genes for which published primers were tested included: internal transcribed spacer [40]; mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I [41]; cytochrome b and 12S rDNA [42]; heat shock protein 70 [43]; and AMP-activated protein kinase [44]. Approximately 5 µl of each PCR product was electrophoresed on a 1% TBE agarose gel and visualized by UV light with with Biotium GelRedTM staining. The PCR products were purified using QIAquick spin columns (Qiagen). Both strands of the template DNA were sequenced using the PCR primers and Big Dye Terminator Ver. 3.1 (Applied Biosystems Inc., ABI), and were run in an ABI 3130 Genetic Analyzer automated capillary DNA sequencer. The 28S rDNA sequences obtained were manually edited, with comparison of aligned sequences for both strands. DNA sequences for O. similis, O. nana and O. atlantica were aligned using the default parameters by Clustal W [45], using MEGA Ver. 5.05 [46]. DNA sequences were submitted to the molecular database, GenBank (http://www.nlm.nih.ncbi.org) and were assigned a GenBank Accession Numbers: FM991727.1; JF419529-JF419547.

Genetic Distances within and between Oithona Species

Analysis was done using a final aligned length of 575 bp of the 28S rRNA gene. Numbers of kind sequence and sequence diversities (h) were calculated for each population sampled for the studied species by DnaSP Ver. 5.10 [47]. Standarized sequence diversities (Hk) were calculated considering the smallest sample size (O. similis: n = 11; O. nana: n = 3; O. atlantica: n = 2) using the software RAREFAC (http://www.pierroton.inra.fr/genetics/labo/Software/Rarefac) [48]. The appropriate best-fit substitution model of DNA evolution was determined with jModelTest Ver. 0.1.1 [49] under the Akaike information criterion (A.I.C.). Neighbor-Joining method [50] analysis implemented in MEGA Ver 5.05 [46] was used on the identified kind sequences to assess the relationships among the three Oithona species based on DNA sequence variation; relative support for the tree topology was obtained by bootstrapping [51] using 10,000 iterations.

Genetic Variation of O. similis

A total of 108 28S rDNA sequences for O. similis were aligned using MEGA Ver. 5.05 [46]. A 51-bp region showing intraspecific variation was used for this analysis; the best-fitting substitution model was determined with jModelTest [49]. The most appropriate model was found to Jukes-Cantor; the model and estimated parameters were set in Arlequin Ver. 3.5.1.2 [52] and the geographic pattern of 28S rDNA variation was assessed. ΦST genetic distances between all pairs of O. similis populations were calculated using Arlequin Ver. 3.5.1.2 [52]. Pairwise ΦST values among all conspecific populations were calculated and tested for significance through 10,000 permutations. For this analysis, all sequence types found in the populations from the Gulf of Maine (GM), Mid Atlantic Bight (MAB), Iceland (IC), Bay of Biscay (BB), Península Valdés (PV) and Bahía Grande (BG) were considered (Table 1). An hierarchical Analysis of MOlecular VAriation [53] was performed using different groupings of populations based on the distances between sampling locations and ΦST distances. The statistical significance of the AMOVA statistics, including among groups (ΦCT), among populations within groups (ΦSC), and within populations (ΦST), was obtained after 10,000 permutations.

Results

DNA sequences of a 575 bp region of the 28S rDNA gene for 108 O. similis individuals revealed the presence of six well-resolved kind sequences and six kind sequences with one or two ambiguous sites (H1–H12). These ambigous sites correspoded to C-T sites, and were defined by equivalents peaks of both bases (Figure S1). Among the 19 O. nana specimens from 3 populations, five kind sequences (H13–H17) defined by ten polymorphic sites were recorded, whereas among the 23 O. atlantica individuals analyzed, distributed in 5 populations, three kind sequences (H18–H20) were found defined by thirteen polymorphic sites. For O. similis, the sequence diversity was somewhat higher at PV than at MAB or IC. An intermediate value was found at GM, while the lower ones were at BG and BB (Table 1). For O. nana, mean values of sequence diversity were found at MAB and PV, while at ER only one sequence type was recorded. In the case of O. atlantica, BB showed the highest sequence diversity value, followed by MAB, while at RdP, 7AR and 8AR, no sequence diversity was detected, since only one sequence type was found (Table 1). The A.I.C. selected the Jukes-Cantor [54] with alpha parameter for the gamma distribution of 0.25 as the evolutionary model that best fit the observed sequence variation. Mean Jukes-Cantor distances within species ranged from 0.001 for O. similis to 0.015 for O. atlantica (Table 2). Genetic distance between species was highest between O. nana and the other two species, with O. nana differing from O. similis by a distance of 0.224 and from O. atlantica by 0.222; the distance between O. similis and O. atlantica was much lower at 0.034 (Figure 2, Table 2).
Table 2

Relationships among the three Oithona species based on 28S rDNA.

Species O. atlantica O. similis O. nana
O. atlantica 0.015 (0.008)
O. similis 0.034 (0.009)0.001 (0.001)
O. nana 0.222 (0.014)0.244 (0.013)0.006 (0.005)

Mean Jukes-Cantor distances within (diagonal) and between (below diagonal) the three Oithona species. Distances among sequence types were calculated with MEGA (Ver. 5.05 using the Jukes-Cantor model with alpha parameter of 0.25. The standard deviation about each mean is indicated in parentheses. Numbers of specimens used for the analysis are: O. similis (108), O. atlantica (23), and O. nana (19).

Figure 2

Relationships among the three Oithona species based on 28S rDNA.

Unrooted Neighbor-Joining analysis under the Jukes-Cantor model, showing relationships among the three Oithona species based on 28S rDNA sequence types of O. similis (H1–H12), O. atlantica (H13–H17) and O. nana (H18–H20). Sequence types found at each species’ type locality are indicated by asterisk (*). Numbers in the nodes indicate the percentage bootstrap recovery after 10,000 repetitions.

Relationships among the three Oithona species based on 28S rDNA.

Unrooted Neighbor-Joining analysis under the Jukes-Cantor model, showing relationships among the three Oithona species based on 28S rDNA sequence types of O. similis (H1–H12), O. atlantica (H13–H17) and O. nana (H18–H20). Sequence types found at each species’ type locality are indicated by asterisk (*). Numbers in the nodes indicate the percentage bootstrap recovery after 10,000 repetitions. Mean Jukes-Cantor distances within (diagonal) and between (below diagonal) the three Oithona species. Distances among sequence types were calculated with MEGA (Ver. 5.05 using the Jukes-Cantor model with alpha parameter of 0.25. The standard deviation about each mean is indicated in parentheses. Numbers of specimens used for the analysis are: O. similis (108), O. atlantica (23), and O. nana (19).

28S rDNA Variation of O. similis

Among twelve 28S rDNA sequences detected for O. similis, H1, H2, H5 and H11 were present in both hemispheres (Figure 3). H1 was the most frequently found, distributed at GM, BB, IC, MAB and PV. H11 was found in GM, BB, IC, MAB, HE and PV, while H2 was present in BB, MAB, and BG. H5 was in IC and BR (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Distribution and frequence of Oithona similis kind sequence.

Pie diagrams depicting the kind sequence frequencies of a 51bp region of 28S for samples of O. similis collected from Gulf of Maine (GM), Iceland (IC), Middle Atlantic Bight (MAB), Bay of Biscay (BB), Península Valdés (PV) and Bahía Grande (BG). Sample size (n =  number of individual copepods) in each location. The twelve O. similis sequence types (H1–H12) are represented by different colours. References in the figure.

Distribution and frequence of Oithona similis kind sequence.

Pie diagrams depicting the kind sequence frequencies of a 51bp region of 28S for samples of O. similis collected from Gulf of Maine (GM), Iceland (IC), Middle Atlantic Bight (MAB), Bay of Biscay (BB), Península Valdés (PV) and Bahía Grande (BG). Sample size (n =  number of individual copepods) in each location. The twelve O. similis sequence types (H1–H12) are represented by different colours. References in the figure. Three sequences were exclusively found in the Northern Hemisphere. They were only present at IC (H8, H12) and MAB (H10, H12) (Figure 3). Five sequences occurred only in the Southern Hemisphere: H3, H4, H6, H7 and H9 (Figure 3). The most frequently found were H3, H4 and H9 which were present at BG and PV. H6 and H7 were only found at PV and RdP (Figure 3). ΦST values [53] derived from genetic distances were significant for all pairwise comparisons between populations except for the pairs GM-IC and PV-BG. Thus, O. similis populations were tentatively separated into four groups: GM+IC; MAB; BB; and PV+BG (Table 3). This clustering was supported by AMOVA analysis, which revealed that 53.58% of the observed genetic variation was among groups, and 37.94% was within populations (Table 4).
Table 3

Pairwise ΦST distances between all O. similis populations with n>1.

GMICPVBGMABBB
GM-
IC0.139-
PV0.603**0.528**-
BG0.907**0.856**0.216-
MAB0.419**0.248*0.286**0.586**-
BB0.886**0.817**0.504**0.687**0.405*-

Asterisks indicate the significance level (p) for each comparison calculated from 10,000 permutations: p<0.001 (*); p<0.0001 (**). Numbers of specimens used for the analysis are: GM (19), BB (16), IC (20), MAB (21), PV (18) and BG (11).

Table 4

Analysis of MOlecular VAriance (AMOVA) based on 28S rDNA sequence data for Oithona similis.

Observed partition
Source of variationVariance%Φ-statisticsP-valued.f.
Among groups0.64653.58ΦST  =  0.5350.023
Among populations within groups0.1028.49ΦSC  =  0.1820.012
Within populations0.45737.94ΦST  =  0.620< 0.01102

Variance and percentage of variance explained (%), fixation indexes (Φ-statistics), P-value indicates probability of obtaining a higher Φ value by chance estimated by 10,000 permutations, d.f.: degrees of freedom. (Refer to Method text for the definition of group and population).

Asterisks indicate the significance level (p) for each comparison calculated from 10,000 permutations: p<0.001 (*); p<0.0001 (**). Numbers of specimens used for the analysis are: GM (19), BB (16), IC (20), MAB (21), PV (18) and BG (11). Variance and percentage of variance explained (%), fixation indexes (Φ-statistics), P-value indicates probability of obtaining a higher Φ value by chance estimated by 10,000 permutations, d.f.: degrees of freedom. (Refer to Method text for the definition of group and population).

Discussion

Accurate and reliable identification of species is a necessary foundation for assessment of biodiversity, especially for important but lesser-known regions of the world ocean, such as the Argentine Sea [55]. DNA sequence variation of target genes provides invaluable tools for such analyses. This study examined variation of a portion of 28S (large subunit) rDNA as a marker to identify and discriminate species of the ecologically-important but understudied cyclopoid copepod genus Oithona, found in the Argentine Sea - Southwest Atlantic Ocean - and North Atlantic Ocean. The species analyzed here, O. similis, O. nana and O. atlantica, were confirmed by molecular analysis to be distinct species, as previously characterized by morphological taxonomic analysis [7], [8], [24], [25]. Inclusion in our analysis of O. similis and O. nana from the type localities was particularly useful to allow determination of reference sequences for these species for future comparisons. The genetic distances observed within and between species of Oithona agreed somewhat with those reported by Ueda et al. [56]. Our distance values were higher than those registered by these authors; which could be related to the fact that they analyzed two size forms of O. dissimilis. Our interspecific genetic distances may reflect the relationships registered by Nishida [8]. In addition to characterizing differences between species, the present work provided preliminary analysis of the levels and patterns of 28S rDNA sequence variation within each of the studied species based on samples collected from a broad latitudinal range of the Atlantic Ocean. Shared kind sequences were detected between North and South Atlantic collections for each of the Oithona species analyzed, despite the large distances between sampling locations. This finding confirms that 28S rDNA serves as a useful genetic marker for identification of these – and likely all – Oithona species, even those with global distributions. Levels of intraspecific variation differed among the species: DNA sequence variation (measured as the percentages of bases) was higher for O. atlantica (1.5%) than either O. nana (0.6%) or O. similis (0.1%). The lower values recorded for O. nana and O. similis, which are both found commonly in coastal and shelf waters, might be due in part to their introduction by ballast water. For the Argentine Sea, [57] reported the presence of O. nana and O. similis in ballast water from commercial vessels from several origins (e.g., Indian and Pacific Ocean, Mediterranean and Baltic Seas and Atlantic ports north of 20°S). At the Russian port of Novorossiysk, high abundances (10,000 individuals/m3) of live individuals of O. nana were found in samples taken from ships’ ballast water [58]. Interestingly, O. similis exhibited significantly different genetic differences among populations sampled for this study, although these differences were the lowest of the three species examined were not correlated with geographic distances, since some samples differed markedly despite their geographic proximity (e.g., GM and MAB). Based on 28S rDNA, O. similis is a single, genetically-cohesive species throughout the studied distributional range. Even for this conserved genetic marker, the species showed significant genetic differentiation among regions of the North and South Atlantic Oceans. It seems likely that geographic populations of O. similis might be primarily isolated by large-scale patterns of ocean circulation, as has been suggested by other genetic analysis of zooplankton in the Atlantic Ocean basin [44], [59], [60]. Our analysis of intraspecific and interspecific patterns of variation for three species of Oithona in selected regions of the North and South Atlantic Oceans demonstrated the usefulness of the 28S rDNA as an accurate and reliable means of identifying and discriminating the species. The 28S rDNA fragment we focused on is included the D1–D2 region, and has been suggested by Sonnenberg et al. [61] as a taxonomic marker due to its variability. Previous studies have used this marker for analysis of copepods [62] and other taxa [63]. Additional analysis of intraspecific variation, including studies using more highly variable molecular markers, will be needed to addresss questions of population connectivity, barriers to genetic cohesion, and discovery of cryptic species among such globally-distributed taxa. Alignment of the twelve 28S rDNA kind sequences of species. (FASTA) Click here for additional data file.
  16 in total

1.  Pulmonate phylogeny based on 28S rRNA gene sequences: a framework for discussing habitat transitions and character transformation.

Authors:  W E Holznagel; D J Colgan; C Lydeard
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 4.286

2.  Molecular phylogeny of Demospongiae: implications for classification and scenarios of character evolution.

Authors:  Carole Borchiellini; Catherine Chombard; Michaël Manuel; Eliane Alivon; Jean Vacelet; Nicole Boury-Esnault
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.286

3.  jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging.

Authors:  David Posada
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP.

Authors:  Joseph Felsenstein
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  N Saitou; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Moving towards a complete molecular framework of the Nematoda: a focus on the Enoplida and early-branching clades.

Authors:  Holly M Bik; P John D Lambshead; W Kelley Thomas; David H Lunt
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates.

Authors:  O Folmer; M Black; W Hoeh; R Lutz; R Vrijenhoek
Journal:  Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol       Date:  1994-10

9.  An evaluation of LSU rDNA D1-D2 sequences for their use in species identification.

Authors:  Rainer Sonnenberg; Arne W Nolte; Diethard Tautz
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 3.172

10.  Annelid phylogeny and the status of Sipuncula and Echiura.

Authors:  Torsten H Struck; Nancy Schult; Tiffany Kusen; Emily Hickman; Christoph Bleidorn; Damhnait McHugh; Kenneth M Halanych
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  On the uncertainty beneath the name Oithona similis Claus, 1866 (Copepoda, Cyclopoida).

Authors:  Georgina D Cepeda; Marina E Sabatini; Cristina L Scioscia; Fernando C Ramírez; María D Viñas
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 1.546

2.  DNA Barcoding of Metazoan Zooplankton Copepods from South Korea.

Authors:  Su Youn Baek; Kuem Hee Jang; Eun Hwa Choi; Shi Hyun Ryu; Sang Ki Kim; Jin Hee Lee; Young Jin Lim; Jimin Lee; Jumin Jun; Myounghai Kwak; Young-Sup Lee; Jae-Sam Hwang; Balu Alagar Venmathi Maran; Cheon Young Chang; Il-Hoi Kim; Ui Wook Hwang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  High-Throughput Sequencing-The Key to Rapid Biodiversity Assessment of Marine Metazoa?

Authors:  Inga Mohrbeck; Michael J Raupach; Pedro Martínez Arbizu; Thomas Knebelsberger; Silke Laakmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Role of DNA barcoding in marine biodiversity assessment and conservation: An update.

Authors:  Subrata Trivedi; Abdulhadi A Aloufi; Abid A Ansari; Sankar K Ghosh
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 4.219

5.  Phylogenetic information content of Copepoda ribosomal DNA repeat units: ITS1 and ITS2 impact.

Authors:  Maxim V Zagoskin; Valentina I Lazareva; Andrey K Grishanin; Dmitry V Mukha
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.