Literature DB >> 22556274

A simulation model to predict the impact of prophylactic surgery and screening on the life expectancy of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Bronislava M Sigal1, Diego F Munoz, Allison W Kurian, Sylvia K Plevritis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women with inherited mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) genes are recommended to undergo a number of intensive cancer risk-reducing strategies, including prophylactic mastectomy, prophylactic oophorectomy, and screening. We estimate the impact of different risk-reducing options at various ages on life expectancy.
METHODS: We apply our previously developed Monte Carlo simulation model of screening and prophylactic surgery in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Here, we present the mathematical formulation to compute age-specific breast cancer incidence in the absence of prophylactic oophorectomy, which is an input to the simulation model, and provide sensitivity analysis on related model parameters.
RESULTS: The greatest gains in life expectancy result from conducting prophylactic mastectomy and prophylactic oophorectomy immediately after BRCA1/2 mutation testing; these gains vary with age at testing, from 6.8 to 10.3 years for BRCA1 and 3.4 to 4.4 years for BRCA2 mutation carriers. Life expectancy gains from delaying prophylactic surgery by 5 to 10 years range from 1 to 9.9 years for BRCA1 and 0.5 to 4.2 years for BRCA2 mutation carriers. Adding annual breast screening provides gains of 2.0 to 9.9 years for BRCA1 and 1.5 to 4.3 years for BRCA2. Results were most sensitive to variations in our assumptions about the magnitude and duration of breast cancer risk reduction due to prophylactic oophorectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Life expectancy gains depend on the type of BRCA mutation and age at interventions. Sensitivity analysis identifies the degree of breast cancer risk reduction due to prophylactic oophorectomy as a key determinant of life expectancy gain. IMPACT: Further study of the impact of prophylactic oophorectomy on breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers is warranted. ©2012 AACR

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22556274      PMCID: PMC4146524          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  38 in total

1.  Annual screening strategies in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers: a comparative effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Kathryn P Lowry; Janie M Lee; Chung Y Kong; Pamela M McMahon; Michael E Gilmore; Jessica E Cott Chubiz; Etta D Pisano; Constantine Gatsonis; Paula D Ryan; Elissa M Ozanne; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Comparative effectiveness of screening and prevention strategies among BRCA1/2-affected mutation carriers.

Authors:  Victor R Grann; Priya R Patel; Judith S Jacobson; Ellen Warner; Daniel F Heitjan; Maxine Ashby-Thompson; Dawn L Hershman; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies.

Authors:  A Antoniou; P D P Pharoah; S Narod; H A Risch; J E Eyfjord; J L Hopper; N Loman; H Olsson; O Johannsson; A Borg; B Pasini; P Radice; S Manoukian; D M Eccles; N Tang; E Olah; H Anton-Culver; E Warner; J Lubinski; J Gronwald; B Gorski; H Tulinius; S Thorlacius; H Eerola; H Nevanlinna; K Syrjäkoski; O-P Kallioniemi; D Thompson; C Evans; J Peto; F Lalloo; D G Evans; D F Easton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Clinico-pathological characteristics of BRCA1- and BRCA2-related breast cancer.

Authors:  P O Chappuis; V Nethercot; W D Foulkes
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-06

5.  Online tool to guide decisions for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Allison W Kurian; Diego F Munoz; Peter Rust; Elizabeth A Schackmann; Michael Smith; Lauren Clarke; Meredith A Mills; Sylvia K Plevritis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

Authors:  Noah D Kauff; Jaya M Satagopan; Mark E Robson; Lauren Scheuer; Martee Hensley; Clifford A Hudis; Nathan A Ellis; Jeff Boyd; Patrick I Borgen; Richard R Barakat; Larry Norton; Mercedes Castiel; Khedoudja Nafa; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-05-20       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Timothy R Rebbeck; Henry T Lynch; Susan L Neuhausen; Steven A Narod; Laura Van't Veer; Judy E Garber; Gareth Evans; Claudine Isaacs; Mary B Daly; Ellen Matloff; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Barbara L Weber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-05-20       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Increased risk of parkinsonism in women who underwent oophorectomy before menopause.

Authors:  W A Rocca; J H Bower; D M Maraganore; J E Ahlskog; B R Grossardt; M de Andrade; L J Melton
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Estrogen receptor positive breast cancers in BRCA1 mutation carriers: clinical risk factors and pathologic features.

Authors:  Nadine Tung; Yihong Wang; Laura C Collins; Jennifer Kaplan; Hailun Li; Rebecca Gelman; Amy H Comander; Bridget Gallagher; Katharina Fetten; Karen Krag; Kathryn A Stoeckert; Robert D Legare; Dennis Sgroi; Paula D Ryan; Judy E Garber; Stuart J Schnitt
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Probability of BRCA1/2 mutation varies with ovarian histology: results from screening 442 ovarian cancer families.

Authors:  D G R Evans; K Young; M Bulman; A Shenton; A Wallace; F Lalloo
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 4.438

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Müllerian intra-abdominal carcinomatosis in hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome: implications for risk-reducing surgery.

Authors:  Murray Joseph Casey; Agnes B Colanta
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 2.  Risk-reducing mastectomy.

Authors:  Federica Chiesa; Virgilio S Sacchini
Journal:  Minerva Ginecol       Date:  2016-01-19

3.  A simple framework to identify optimal cost-effective risk thresholds for a single screen: Comparison to Decision Curve Analysis.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki; Ionut Bebu
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.175

4.  Targeted BRCA1/2 population screening among Ashkenazi Jewish individuals using a web-enabled medical model: An observational cohort study.

Authors:  Kelly M Morgan; Jada G Hamilton; Heather Symecko; Daniella Kamara; Colby Jenkins; Jenny Lester; Kelsey Spielman; Lydia E Pace; Camila Gabriel; Jeffrey D Levin; Prince Rainier Tejada; Anthony Braswell; Vanessa Marcell; Temima Wildman; Bryan Devolder; Robin Camhi Baum; Jeremy N Block; Yuri Fesko; Kylin Boehler; Victoria Howell; Jacob Heitler; Mark E Robson; Katherine L Nathanson; Nadine Tung; Beth Y Karlan; Susan M Domchek; Judy E Garber; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 8.864

5.  Perceptions, knowledge, and satisfaction with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among young women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Shoshana M Rosenberg; Michaela S Tracy; Meghan E Meyer; Karen Sepucha; Shari Gelber; Judi Hirshfield-Bartek; Susan Troyan; Monica Morrow; Lidia Schapira; Steven E Come; Eric P Winer; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Challenging and complex decisions in the management of the BRCA mutation carrier.

Authors:  Daniela L Stan; Lynne T Shuster; Myra J Wick; Casey L Swanson; Sandhya Pruthi; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 7.  Through the glass darkly: intraepithelial neoplasia, top-down differentiation, and the road to ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Christopher P Crum; Michael Herfs; Gang Ning; Jonathan G Bijron; Brooke E Howitt; Cynthia A Jimenez; Suchanan Hanamornroongruang; Frank D McKeon; Wa Xian
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 7.996

8.  Feasibility evaluation of an online tool to guide decisions for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Schackmann; Diego F Munoz; Meredith A Mills; Sylvia K Plevritis; Allison W Kurian
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 9.  Role of Breast Surgery in BRCA Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Carolin Nestle-Krämling; Thorsten Kühn
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Cost-effectiveness of population screening for BRCA mutations in Ashkenazi jewish women compared with family history-based testing.

Authors:  Ranjit Manchanda; Rosa Legood; Matthew Burnell; Alistair McGuire; Maria Raikou; Kelly Loggenberg; Jane Wardle; Saskia Sanderson; Sue Gessler; Lucy Side; Nyala Balogun; Rakshit Desai; Ajith Kumar; Huw Dorkins; Yvonne Wallis; Cyril Chapman; Rohan Taylor; Chris Jacobs; Ian Tomlinson; Uziel Beller; Usha Menon; Ian Jacobs
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.