Literature DB >> 22555003

Ascertainment correction for a population tree via a pruning algorithm for likelihood computation.

Arindam RoyChoudhury1, Elizabeth A Thompson.   

Abstract

We present a method for correcting ascertainment-bias in a coalescent-based likelihood for population trees. Our method is computationally simple and fast. To correct for the bias we compute the probability of allele-counts conditioned on the locus being included. This conditional probability is simply the uncorrected likelihood divided by the inclusion probability. A modification of a pruning algorithm is introduced so that the inclusion probability can be computed with a single run of the algorithm. Our computation is exact and avoids Monte-Carlo based methods.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22555003      PMCID: PMC4181591          DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2012.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Popul Biol        ISSN: 0040-5809            Impact factor:   1.570


  8 in total

1.  General models for segregation analysis.

Authors:  R C Elston; K C Yelverton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Correcting for ascertainment biases when analyzing SNP data: applications to the estimation of linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  Rasmus Nielsen; James Signorovitch
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  The International HapMap Project.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Inferring species trees directly from biallelic genetic markers: bypassing gene trees in a full coalescent analysis.

Authors:  David Bryant; Remco Bouckaert; Joseph Felsenstein; Noah A Rosenberg; Arindam RoyChoudhury
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  A two-stage pruning algorithm for likelihood computation for a population tree.

Authors:  Arindam RoyChoudhury; Joseph Felsenstein; Elizabeth A Thompson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Composite likelihood-based inferences on genetic data from dependent loci.

Authors:  Arindam RoyChoudhury
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 2.259

7.  Ascertainment bias in studies of human genome-wide polymorphism.

Authors:  Andrew G Clark; Melissa J Hubisz; Carlos D Bustamante; Scott H Williamson; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Ascertainment and age of onset in pedigree analysis.

Authors:  R C Elston
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 0.444

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  The probability of monophyly of a sample of gene lineages on a species tree.

Authors:  Rohan S Mehta; David Bryant; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The Probability of Joint Monophyly of Samples of Gene Lineages for All Species in an Arbitrary Species Tree.

Authors:  Rohan S Mehta; Mike Steel; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 1.549

3.  Bayesian Divergence-Time Estimation with Genome-Wide Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Data of Sea Catfishes (Ariidae) Supports Miocene Closure of the Panamanian Isthmus.

Authors:  Madlen Stange; Marcelo R Sánchez-Villagra; Walter Salzburger; Michael Matschiner
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 15.683

4.  Approximate Likelihood Estimation of Divergence Time Range Using a Coalescent-based Model.

Authors:  Arindam Roychoudhury
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 1.625

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.