OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to explore empathic communication opportunities presented by family caregivers and responses from interdisciplinary hospice team members. METHODS: Empathic opportunities and hospice team responses were analyzed from bi-weekly web-based videoconferences between family caregivers and hospice teams. The authors coded the data using the Empathic Communication Coding System (ECCS) and identified themes within and among the coded data. RESULTS: Data analysis identified 270 empathic opportunity-team response sequences. Caregivers expressed statements of emotion and decline most frequently. Two-thirds of the hospice team responses were implicit acknowledgements of caregiver statements and only one-third of the team responses were explicit recognitions of caregiver empathic opportunities. CONCLUSION: Although hospice team members frequently express emotional concerns with family caregivers during one-on-one visits, there is a need for more empathic communication during team meetings that involve caregivers. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Hospice clinicians should devote more time to discussing emotional issues with patients and their families to enhance patient-centered hospice care. Further consideration should be given to training clinicians to empathize with patients and family caregivers.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to explore empathic communication opportunities presented by family caregivers and responses from interdisciplinary hospice team members. METHODS: Empathic opportunities and hospice team responses were analyzed from bi-weekly web-based videoconferences between family caregivers and hospice teams. The authors coded the data using the Empathic Communication Coding System (ECCS) and identified themes within and among the coded data. RESULTS: Data analysis identified 270 empathic opportunity-team response sequences. Caregivers expressed statements of emotion and decline most frequently. Two-thirds of the hospice team responses were implicit acknowledgements of caregiver statements and only one-third of the team responses were explicit recognitions of caregiver empathic opportunities. CONCLUSION: Although hospice team members frequently express emotional concerns with family caregivers during one-on-one visits, there is a need for more empathic communication during team meetings that involve caregivers. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Hospice clinicians should devote more time to discussing emotional issues with patients and their families to enhance patient-centered hospice care. Further consideration should be given to training clinicians to empathize with patients and family caregivers.
Authors: Norissa J Honea; Ruthann Brintnall; Barbara Given; Paula Sherwood; Deirdre B Colao; Susan C Somers; Laurel L Northouse Journal: Clin J Oncol Nurs Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 1.027
Authors: Anthony L Back; Robert M Arnold; Walter F Baile; James A Tulsky; Gwyn E Barley; Roy D Pea; Kelly A Fryer-Edwards Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-01-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Karla T Washington; Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles; Debra Parker Oliver; George Demiris; Sara Shaunfield; Edith Crumb Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Carma L Bylund; Greenberry Taylor; Emily Mroz; Diana J Wilkie; Yingwei Yao; Linda Emanuel; George Fitchett; George Handzo; Harvey Max Chochinov; Susan Bluck Journal: Palliat Support Care Date: 2022-06
Authors: Rebecca N Hutchinson; Eric C Anderson; Mollie A Ruben; Noah Manning; Liam John; Ava Daruvala; Donna M Rizzo; Margaret J Eppstein; Robert Gramling; Paul K J Han Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2022-04-12 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Stewart C Alexander; Susan Ladwig; Sally A Norton; David Gramling; J Kelly Davis; Maureen Metzger; Jane DeLuca; Robert Gramling Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Debra Parker Oliver; George Demiris; Karla Washington; Robin L Kruse; Greg Petroski Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2016-07-27 Impact factor: 2.500