Rebecca N Hutchinson1,2,3, Eric C Anderson1,2, Mollie A Ruben4, Noah Manning2, Liam John5, Ava Daruvala2, Donna M Rizzo6, Margaret J Eppstein6, Robert Gramling5, Paul K J Han1,7. 1. Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, Portland, Maine, USA. 2. Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Division of Palliative Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine, USA. 4. University of Maine, Orono, Maine, USA. 5. Department of Family Medicine, Larner College of Medicine, and University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA. 6. College of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA. 7. Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
Background: It is unknown whether telemedicine-delivered palliative care (tele-PC) supports emotionally responsive patient-clinician interactions. Objectives: We conducted a mixed-methods formative study at two academic medical centers in rural U.S. states to explore the acceptability, feasibility, and emotional responsiveness of tele-PC. Design: We assessed clinicians' emotional responsiveness through questionnaires, qualitative interviews, and video coding. Results: We completed 11 tele-PC consultations. Mean age was 71 years, 30% did not complete high school, 55% experienced at least moderate financial insecurity, and 2/3 rated their overall health poorly. All patients rated tele-PC as equal to, or better than, in-person PC at providing emotional support. There was a tendency toward higher positive and lower negative emotions following the consultation. Video coding identified 114 instances of patients expressing emotions, and clinicians detected and responded to 98% of these events. Conclusion: Tele-PC appears to support emotionally responsive patient-clinician interactions. A mixed-methods approach to evaluating tele-PC yields useful, complementary insights.
Background: It is unknown whether telemedicine-delivered palliative care (tele-PC) supports emotionally responsive patient-clinician interactions. Objectives: We conducted a mixed-methods formative study at two academic medical centers in rural U.S. states to explore the acceptability, feasibility, and emotional responsiveness of tele-PC. Design: We assessed clinicians' emotional responsiveness through questionnaires, qualitative interviews, and video coding. Results: We completed 11 tele-PC consultations. Mean age was 71 years, 30% did not complete high school, 55% experienced at least moderate financial insecurity, and 2/3 rated their overall health poorly. All patients rated tele-PC as equal to, or better than, in-person PC at providing emotional support. There was a tendency toward higher positive and lower negative emotions following the consultation. Video coding identified 114 instances of patients expressing emotions, and clinicians detected and responded to 98% of these events. Conclusion: Tele-PC appears to support emotionally responsive patient-clinician interactions. A mixed-methods approach to evaluating tele-PC yields useful, complementary insights.
Entities:
Keywords:
rural health; telemedicine; telepalliative care
Authors: Carole A Robinson; Barbara Pesut; Joan L Bottorff; Andrea Mowry; Sandra Broughton; Gillian Fyles Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2009-02-13 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Sabrina Ford; Joanna Buscemi; Kelly Hirko; Melissa Laitner; Robert L Newton; Charles Jonassaint; Marian Fitzgibbon; Lisa M Klesges Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2020-05-20 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Juliet Jacobsen; Vicki Jackson; Constance Dahlin; Joseph Greer; Pedro Perez-Cruz; J Andrew Billings; William Pirl; Jennifer Temel Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2011-03-18 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Robert Gramling; Susan Stanek; Susan Ladwig; Elizabeth Gajary-Coots; Jenica Cimino; Wendy Anderson; Sally A Norton; Rebecca A Aslakson; Katherine Ast; Ronit Elk; Kimberly K Garner; Robert Gramling; Corita Grudzen; Arif H Kamal; Sangeeta Lamba; Thomas W LeBlanc; Ramona L Rhodes; Eric Roeland; Dena Schulman-Green; Kathleen T Unroe Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Katharine L Cheung; Manjula Kurella Tamura; Renee D Stapleton; Terry Rabinowitz; Michael A LaMantia; Robert Gramling Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2021-01-19 Impact factor: 2.947