Literature DB >> 22553760

Clinical evaluation of two multifocal intraocular lens implantation patterns.

Hao-Tian Lin1, Wei-Rong Chen, Zhao-Feng Ding, Wan Chen, Chang-Rui Wu.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the visual outcomes and patient satisfaction of two multifocal intraocular lens implantation patterns, with the decision between the two patterns being guided by the patients' choice of visual zones that best suited their lifestyle, or lifestyle zones.
METHODS: This is a prospective non-randomized comparative study. The lifestyle zones of 32 consecutive age-related cataract patients (64 eyes) were investigated individually to guide the surgical decision between two multifocal intraocular lens implantation patterns. The first group (MIX) received a combined implantation of a ReZoom NXG1 lens in the dominant eye and a Tecnis ZM900 lens in the other eye. The second group (MATCH) received bilateral ReZoom NXG1 lenses. One year postoperatively, the patients were assessed for binocular uncorrected visual acuity, reading visual acuity, reading speed and depth of focus under different luminance and were surveyed for visual disturbances, satisfaction and complete spectacle independence.
RESULTS: According to the determination of lifestyle zones, 18 and 14 patients were included in the MIX and MATCH groups, respectively. One year postoperatively, each of the patients exhibited positive visual outcomes and lifestyle satisfaction, although there were still some differences between the two groups. Generally, patients in the MATCH group had better distance visual acuity than those in the MIX group. In contrast, patients in the MIX group had better near visual acuity, better reading acuity and better reading speed than those in the MATCH group. Between the two groups, there was no clear difference in intermediate visual acuity, and the depths of focus between the two groups were approximately equal. The results of the mean NEI-RQL-42 questionnaire score, overall satisfaction, and complete spectacle independence did not differ between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Different multifocal intraocular lenses implantation patterns can have differing advantages and disadvantages; however, the best results with respect to visual outcome and patient satisfaction can be achieved by taking individual lifestyle zones into account.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intraocular lens; patient satisfaction; visual outcomes

Year:  2012        PMID: 22553760      PMCID: PMC3340833          DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2012.01.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  26 in total

1.  What predicts depression in cardiac patients: sociodemographic factors, disease severity or theoretical vulnerabilities?

Authors:  F Doyle; H M McGee; R M Conroy; M Delaney
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2010-11-01

Review 2.  Informed consent in cataract surgery.

Authors:  Richard L Abbott
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.761

Review 3.  Maximizing satisfaction with presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses: the missing links.

Authors:  Jay S Pepose
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Reliability testing of the Dutch version of the Radner Reading Charts.

Authors:  Kristel Maaijwee; Paul Mulder; Wolfgang Radner; Jan C Van Meurs
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  High, medium, and low contrast visual acuities in diabetic retinal disease.

Authors:  Anusha Yasvantrai Sukha; Alan Rubin
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Reading ability with 3 multifocal intraocular lens models.

Authors:  Werner W Hütz; H Berthold Eckhardt; Bern Röhrig; Roman Grolmus
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Reliability and validity of refractive error-specific quality-of-life instruments.

Authors:  Jason J Nichols; G Lynn Mitchell; Mario Saracino; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-09

8.  One-year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Salvatore Cillino; Alessandra Casuccio; Francesco Di Pace; Raffaella Morreale; Francesco Pillitteri; Giovanni Cillino; Gaetano Lodato
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Reading ability and stereoacuity with combined implantation of refractive and diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Weirong Chen; Qianli Meng; Haiyun Ye; Yizhi Liu
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.761

10.  Providing patients a complete range of vision correction options.

Authors:  Peter H Kehoe
Journal:  Optometry       Date:  2009-08
View more
  3 in total

1.  Visual function and higher order aberration after implantation of aspheric and spherical multifocal intraocular lenses: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian-Ping Liu; Fan Zhang; Jiang-Yue Zhao; Li-Wei Ma; Jin-Song Zhang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Bilateral Implantation of a New Refractive Multi-Segmented Multifocal Intraocular Lens in Cataract or Refractive Lens Exchange Patients.

Authors:  Mike P Holzer; Rudy M M A Nuijts; Soraya M R Jonker; Erik L J G Mertens; Asim Bozkurt Sener; Jorge A O Cazal; Antoni Salvador Playa; Ramon Ruiz Mesa; Bettina C Thomas
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-21

3.  Psychometric properties of the national eye institute refractive error correction quality-of-life questionnaire among Iranian patients.

Authors:  Amir H Pakpour; Isa Mohammadi Zeidi; Mohsen Saffari; Georgios Labiris; Bengt Fridlund
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.