OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to clarify differences in oral health status between patients who needed haemodialysis (HD) owing to diabetic nephropathy (DN) and chronic glomerulonephritis (CGN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-eight HD patients who were 50-70 years old were selected as the study subjects [DN group (29 subjects) and CGN group (69 subjects)] to compare with 106 control subjects (control group) not undergoing HD. All HD subjects underwent oral- and systemic-related examination just before HD therapy. RESULTS: The mean number of teeth present in the DN group was significantly less than in the CGN and control groups. The mean percentage of sites with bleeding on probing in the DN group was greater than in the CGN and control groups. The mean salivary flow rate in the DN and CGN groups was significantly lower compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: The patients undergoing HD for DN were found to have fewer teeth and worse periodontal health compared with those undergoing HD for CGN and with the control subjects not undergoing HD. Furthermore, the dental and periodontal health of the patients undergoing HD for CGN was comparable to that of the controls. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: For effective measures of prevention and improvement of oral health in HD patients, clinicians should be aware of the differences in the characteristics of the oral health between patients undergoing HD for DN and CGN.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to clarify differences in oral health status between patients who needed haemodialysis (HD) owing to diabetic nephropathy (DN) and chronic glomerulonephritis (CGN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-eight HDpatients who were 50-70 years old were selected as the study subjects [DN group (29 subjects) and CGN group (69 subjects)] to compare with 106 control subjects (control group) not undergoing HD. All HD subjects underwent oral- and systemic-related examination just before HD therapy. RESULTS: The mean number of teeth present in the DN group was significantly less than in the CGN and control groups. The mean percentage of sites with bleeding on probing in the DN group was greater than in the CGN and control groups. The mean salivary flow rate in the DN and CGN groups was significantly lower compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: The patients undergoing HD for DN were found to have fewer teeth and worse periodontal health compared with those undergoing HD for CGN and with the control subjects not undergoing HD. Furthermore, the dental and periodontal health of the patients undergoing HD for CGN was comparable to that of the controls. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: For effective measures of prevention and improvement of oral health in HDpatients, clinicians should be aware of the differences in the characteristics of the oral health between patients undergoing HD for DN and CGN.
Authors: C P Bots; J H G Poorterman; H S Brand; H Kalsbeek; B M van Amerongen; E C I Veerman; A V Nieuw Amerongen Journal: Oral Dis Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 3.511
Authors: Nuria Patiño Marín; Juan P Loyola Rodríguez; Carlo E Medina Solis; América P Pontigo Loyola; Juan F Reyes Macías; Jenny C Ortega Rosado; Celia Aradillas García Journal: Acta Odontol Latinoam Date: 2008
Authors: Agata Trzcionka; Henryk Twardawa; Katarzyna Mocny-Pachońska; Rafał Korkosz; Marta Tanasiewicz Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-27 Impact factor: 3.390