Literature DB >> 22551835

How feasible are lifestyle modification programs for disease prevention in general practice?

Heike Schütze1, Elizabeth F Rix, Rachel A Laws, Megan Passey, Mahnaz Fanaian, Mark F Harris.   

Abstract

Vascular disease is a leading cause of death and disability. While it is preventable, little is known about the feasibility or acceptability of implementing interventions to prevent vascular disease in Australian primary health care. We conducted a cluster randomised controlled trial assessing prevention of vascular disease in patients aged 40-65 by providing a lifestyle modification program in general practice. Interviews with 13 general practices in the intervention arm of this trial examined their views on implementing the lifestyle modification program in general practice settings. Qualitative study, involving thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with 11 general practitioners, four practice nurses and five allied health providers between October 2009 and April 2010. Providing brief lifestyle intervention fitted well with routine health-check consultations; however, acceptance and referral to the program was dependent on the level of facilitation provided by program coordinators. Respondents reported that patients engaged with the advice and strategies provided in the program, which helped them make lifestyle changes. Practice nurse involvement was important to sustaining implementation in general practice, while the lack of referral services for people at risk of developing vascular disease threatens maintenance of lifestyle changes as few respondents thought patients would continue lifestyle changes without long-term follow up. Lifestyle modification programs to prevent vascular disease are feasible in general practice but must be provided in a flexible format, such as being offered out of hours to facilitate uptake, with ongoing support and follow up to assist maintenance. The newly formed Medicare Locals may have an important role in facilitating lifestyle modification programs for this target group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22551835     DOI: 10.1071/PY10106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Prim Health        ISSN: 1448-7527            Impact factor:   1.307


  4 in total

1.  Is there scope for community health nurses to address lifestyle risk factors? the community nursing SNAP trial.

Authors:  Bibiana C Chan; Rachel A Laws; Anna M Williams; Gawaine Powell Davies; Mahnaz Fanaian; Mark F Harris
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2012-03-15

2.  Perspectives of older people engaging in nurse-led cardiovascular prevention programmes: a qualitative study in primary care in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Suzanne A Ligthart; Karin D M van den Eerenbeemt; Jeanette Pols; Emma F van Bussel; Edo Richard; Eric P Moll van Charante
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  A narrative systematic review of factors affecting diabetes prevention in primary care settings.

Authors:  Josie Messina; Stephen Campbell; Rebecca Morris; Emily Eyles; Caroline Sanders
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Incorporating a brief intervention for personalised cancer risk assessment to promote behaviour change into primary care: a multi-methods pilot study.

Authors:  Katie Mills; Ben Paxton; Fiona M Walter; Simon J Griffin; Stephen Sutton; Juliet A Usher-Smith
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.295

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.