| Literature DB >> 22550534 |
Umme Ruman Siddiqi1, Prisca Susan A Leano, Haorile Chagan-Yasutan, Beata Shiratori, Hiroki Saitoh, Yugo Ashino, Yasuhiko Suzuki, Toshio Hattori, Elizabeth Freda O Telan.
Abstract
Anti-tubercular-glycolipid-IgG (TBGL-IgG) and -IgA (TBGL-IgA) antibodies, and the QuantiFERON-TB Gold test (QFT) were compared in healthcare workers (HCWs, n = 31) and asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus-carriers (HIV-AC, n = 56) in Manila. In HCWs, 48%, 51%, and 19% were positive in QFT, TBGL-IgG, and -IgA, respectively. The TBGL-IgG positivity was significantly higher (P = 0.02) in QFT-positive than QFT-negative HCWs. Both TBGL-IgG- and -IgA-positive cases were only found in QFT-positive HCWs (27%). The plasma IFN-γ levels positively correlated with TBGL-IgA titers (r = 0.74, P = 0.005), but not TBGL-IgG titers in this group, indicating that mucosal immunity is involved in LTBI in immunocompetent individuals. The QFT positivity in HIV-AC was 31% in those with CD4+ cell counts >350/μL and 12.5% in low CD4 group (<350/μL). 59 % and 29% were positive for TBGL-IgG and -IgA, respectively, in HIV-AC, but no association was found between QFT and TBGL assays. TBGL-IgG-positive rates in QFT-positive and QFT-negative HIV-AC were 61% and 58%, and those of TBGL-IgA were 23% and 30%, respectively. The titers of TBGL-IgA were associated with serum IgA (P = 0.02) in HIV-AC. Elevations of TBGL-IgG and -IgA were related to latent tuberculosis infection in HCWs, but careful interpretation is necessary in HIV-AC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22550534 PMCID: PMC3329196 DOI: 10.1155/2012/610707
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Dev Immunol ISSN: 1740-2522
Demographic and clinical data of study participants.
| Variables | HCWs ( | HIV-AC ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Demographic data | |||
| Gender: male; | 16 (51.6) | 55 (96.5) | <0.0001* |
| Age year; median (range) | 35 (19~62) | 28 (19~48) | 0.03* |
| Laboratory findings† | |||
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 13.2 ± 2.6 | 13 ± 1.49 | 0.36 |
| RBC (million/ | 4.96 ± 1.6 | 4.43 ± .55 | 0.069 |
| WBC (103/ | 7.5 ± 2.5 | 5.9 ± 1.9 | 0.01* |
| Neutrophil (103/ | 4.4 ± 2.2 | 3.3 ± 1.2 | 0.048* |
| Lymphocyte (103/ | 2.4 ± 0.6 | 2.2 ± 0.9 | 0.82 |
| Monocyte (/ | 562 ± 237 | 338 ± 182 | <0.001* |
| CD4+ T-cell count (/ | ND | 443 ± 286 | NA |
| QFT assay positive; | 15 (48) | 13 (23) | 0.03* |
| TBGL-IgG positive; | 16 (51) | 33 (59) | 0.9 |
| TBGL-IgA positive; | 6 (19) | 16 (29) | 0.87 |
| IFN- | 0.42 ± 0.96 | 0.13 ± 0.11 | <0.001* |
| TBGL-IgG (U/mL) | 3.12 ± 3.36 | 3.94 ± 6.63 | 0.14 |
| TBGL-IgA (U/mL) | 1.68 ± 2.56 | 3.1 ± 6.64 | 0.012* |
| Serum IgG (mg/dL) | 1409 ± 212 | 1391 ± 224 | 0.49 |
| Serum IgA (mg/dL) | 246 ± 92 | 319 ± 138 | 0.058 |
| OPN (ng/mL) | 14.4 ± 11 | 159 ± 191 | <0.00001* |
| Leptin (ng/mL) | 18.6 ± 13.9 | 7.2 ± 5.4 | <0.001* |
Abbreviations: HCWs, healthcare workers; HIV-AC, newly diagnosed cases of asymptomatic human immune-deficiency virus infection; OPN, osteopontin; ND, not determined; NA, not applicable.
† values were presented as mean ± SD unless indicated otherwise; IFN-γ-nc: levels of IFN-γ, measured in the nonstimulated QFT-plasma samples; P values for statistical differences between HCW and HIV-AC; * significant differences (P < 0.05).
Figure 1Positivity percentage of TBGL-IgG/IgA assay in QFT-positive/negative healthcare workers. The level of agreement between QFT and the TBGL-Ab assay was measured by Cohen's kappa (κ). ¶κ = 0.42; overall agreement 71%; 95% confidence interval: 0.1~0.73. *Significant difference (P < 0.05).
Comparison between QFT-positive and QFT-negative HCWs and HIV-AC.
| Variables | HCWs | HIV-AC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QFT+ ( | QFT− ( |
| QFT+ ( | QFT− ( |
| |
| Age; median (range) | 45 (21~62) | 23.5 (19~48) | 0.002* | 25 (19~45) | 31 (21~35) | 0.036* |
| Gender: male; | 7 (46.6) | 9 (47.4) | 0.43 | 12 (92.3) | 42 (97.67) | 0.43 |
| Work duration->10 yrs; | 11(73.3) | 6 (37.5) | 0.098 | NA | NA | NA |
| CD4+ count (/ | ND | ND | NA | 611 (148~1466) | 356 (13~1125) | 0.012* |
| TBGL-IgG positive; | 11 (73) | 5 (31) | 0.02* | 8 (61.5) | 25 (58.13) | 0.545 |
| TBGL-IgA positive; | 5 (33) | 1 (6) | 0.072 | 3 (23) | 13 (30) | 0.415 |
| TBGL-IgG+IgA positive; | 4 (27) | 0 (0) | 0.043* | 2(15.4) | 10 (23.3) | 0.42 |
| IFN- | 0.3 ± 0.4 | 0.2 ± 0.13 | 0.9 | 0.21 ± 0.17 | 0.1 ± 0.07 | 0.0087* |
| Serum IgG (mg/dL)† | 1450 ± 188 | 1368 ± 235 | 0.2 | 1306 ± 207 | 1414 ± 249 | 0.5 |
| Serum IgA (mg/dL)† | 268 ± 81 | 225 ± 101 | 0.32 | 330 ± 130 | 312 ± 138 | 0.68 |
| OPN (ng/mL)† | 14.5 ± 11.2 | 14.2 ± 11.2 | 0.87 | 115.4 ± 130 | 173.2 ± 203 | 0.43 |
| Leptin (ng/mL)† | 21.3 ± 13.3 | 15.9 ± 14.3 | 0.25 | 6.46 ± 4.12 | 7.448 ± 5.68 | 0.24 |
Abbreviations: HCWs, healthcare workers; HIV-AC, newly diagnosed cases of asymptomatic human immune-deficiency virus infection; OPN, osteopontin; ND, not determined; NA, not applicable.
†mean ± SD; IFN-γ-nc: levels of IFN-γ, measured in the nonstimulated QFT-plasma samples; P values for statistical differences between QFT-positive and QTF-negative groups; *significant differences (P < 0.05).
Figure 2Correlations between TBGL-IgA or TBGL-IgG titers and IFN-γ concentrations measured in nonstimulated QFT-plasma samples (IFN-γ-nc) in QFT-positive/QTF-negative healthcare workers (HCWs) and asymptomatic HIV carriers (HIV-AC). The only significant positive correlation was observed between the IFN-γ-nc concentrations and TBGL-IgA titers in the QFT-positive HCW group (r = 0.74, P = 0.005).
Comparison between TBGL-IgG or TBGL-IgA-positive and -negative HIV-AC.
| Variables | TBGL-IgG | TBGL-IgA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive ( | Negative ( |
| Positive ( | Negative ( |
| |
| Age; median (range) | 28 (19~48) | 30 (19~41) | 0.18 | 31.5 (19~48) | 28 (19~45) | 0.038* |
| Gender: male; | 33 (100) | 21 (91.3) | 0.43 | 16 (100) | 38 (95) | 1 |
| CD4 count (/ | 436 (13~1466) | 450 (60~851) | 0.45 | 346 (46~1125) | 480 (13~1466) | 0.06 |
| QFT positive; | 8 (24.2) | 5 (21.7) | 0.545 | 3 (19) | 10 (25) | 0.45 |
| TBGL-IgA positive; | 12 (36.4) | 4 (17.4) | 0.1 | — | — | — |
| TBGL-IgG positive; | — | — | — | 12 (75) | 21 (52.5) | 0.14 |
| IFN- | 0.13 ± 0.09 | 0.1 ± 0.05 | 0.4 | 0.12 ± 0.09 | 0.12 ± 0.07 | 0.9 |
| TBGL-IgA (U/mL)† | 4.36 ± 8.4 | 1.28 ± 1.21 | 0.041* | — | — | |
| TBGL-IgG (U/mL)† | — | — | 7.5 ± 11.6 | 2.5 ± 1.5 | 0.042* | |
| Serum IgG (mg/dL)† | 1439 ± 277 | 1515 ± 677 | 0.5 | 1615 ± 404 | 1355 ± 135 | 0.46 |
| Serum IgA (mg/dL)† | 277 ± 95 | 279 ± 74 | 0.37 | 410 ± 165 | 313 ± 138 | 0.015* |
| OPN (ng/mL)† | 176.3 ± 199.9 | 136 ± 172.5 | 0.67 | 280 ± 275 | 115 ± 109.7 | 0.03* |
| Leptin (ng/mL)† | 7.33 ± 6.16 | 7.18 ± 4.12 | 0.68 | 7.33 ± 6.16 | 7.18 ± 4.12 | 0.07 |
Abbreviations: HIV-AC, newly diagnosed cases of asymptomatic human immune-deficiency virus infection; OPN, osteopontin.
†mean ± SD; IFN-γ-nc: levels of IFN-γ, measured in the nonstimulated QFT-plasma samples; P for statistical differences between QFT-positive and QTF-negative groups; *significant differences (P < 0.05).
Comparison between HIV-AC with high§ and low‡ CD4+ T-cell count.
| Variables | CD4+ high§ ( | CD4+ low‡ ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age; mean (range) | 25.5 (19~45) | 25 (22~48) | 0.018* |
| Gender: male; | 31 (97) | 23 (98) | 1.0 |
| CD4+ count (/ | 618 (356~1466) | 201 (13~349) | <0.001* |
| QFT-positive; | 10 (31) | 3 (12.5) | 0.12 |
| TBGL-IgG positive; | 16 (50) | 16 (67) | 0.27 |
| TBGL-IgA positive; | 5 (16) | 11 (46) | 0.018* |
| TBGL-IgG+ IgA positive; | 5 (16) | 7 (29) | 0.32 |
| IFN- | 0.14 ± 0.12 | 0.13 ± 0.09 | 0.9 |
| TBGL-IgG (U/mL)† | 4.6 ± 8.4 | 3 ± 2.8 | 0.59 |
| TBGL-IgA (U/mL)† | 1.55 ± 2 | 5.16 ± 9.6 | 0.048* |
| Serum IgG (mg/dL)† | 1352 ± 185 | 1549 ± 380 | 0.5 |
| Serum IgA (mg/dL)† | 265 ± 89 | 423 ± 149 | <0.001* |
| OPN (ng/mL)† | 119 ± 126 | 214 ± 246 | 0.19 |
| Leptin (ng/mL)† | 7.7 ± 6 | 6.6 ± 4.9 | 0.5 |
Abbreviation: HIV-AC, newly diagnosed cases of asymptomatic human immune-deficiency virus infection; OPN: osteopontin.
§High: CD4+ T cell count ≥350/μL; ‡low: CD4+ T-cell count <350/μL; †mean±SD; IFN-γ-nc: levels of IFN-γ, measured in the non-stimulated QFT-plasma samples; P values for statistical differences between QFT-positive and QTF-negative groups; *significant differences (P < 0.05).
Figure 3Receiver operating characteristic analysis for comparison of biomarkers between healthcare workers and asymptomatic HIV carriers. The result showed that the OPN plasma levels of OPN (log) exhibited the greatest ability to discriminate HIV from HCW based on the AUC (0.883), followed by leptin (0.763) and net IFN-γ (0.648).