OBJECTIVES: To establish if changes in Th1/Th17 cell populations previously reported in experimental arthritis occur in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with anti-tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) agents, and whether the therapeutic response to anti-TNFα is compromised in patients and mice because of elevated Th17/IL-17 levels. Finally, to assess the efficacy of combined blockade of anti-TNFα and anti-IL-17 in experimental arthritis. METHODS: A longitudinal study of two independent cohorts (cohort 1, n=24; cohort 2, n=19) of patients with RA treated with anti-TNFα biological agents was carried out to assess their Th17/IL-17 levels before and after the start of anti-TNFα therapy. IL-12/23p40 production was assessed in plasma Peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) and monocytes. Mice with collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) were treated with anti-TNFα alone, anti-IL17 alone or a combination of the two. Efficacy of treatment and response was assessed from changes in Disease Activity Score 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate scores in patients, and in clinical scores and histological analysis in CIA. RESULTS: Significant increases in circulating Th17 cells were observed in patients after anti-TNFα therapy and this was accompanied by increased production of IL-12/23p40. There was an inverse relationship between baseline Th17 levels and the subsequent response of patients with RA to anti-TNFα therapy. In addition, PBLs from non-responder patients showed evidence of increased IL-17 production. Similarly, in anti-TNFα-treated mice, there was a strong correlation between IL-17 production and clinical score. Finally combined blockade of TNFα and IL-17 in CIA was more effective than monotherapy, particularly with respect to the duration of the therapeutic effect. CONCLUSIONS: These findings, which need to be confirmed in a larger cohort, suggest that a Th17-targeted therapeutic approach may be useful for anti-TNFα non-responder patients or as an adjunct to anti-TNFα therapy, provided that safety concerns can be addressed.
OBJECTIVES: To establish if changes in Th1/Th17 cell populations previously reported in experimental arthritis occur in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with anti-tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) agents, and whether the therapeutic response to anti-TNFα is compromised in patients and mice because of elevated Th17/IL-17 levels. Finally, to assess the efficacy of combined blockade of anti-TNFα and anti-IL-17 in experimental arthritis. METHODS: A longitudinal study of two independent cohorts (cohort 1, n=24; cohort 2, n=19) of patients with RA treated with anti-TNFα biological agents was carried out to assess their Th17/IL-17 levels before and after the start of anti-TNFα therapy. IL-12/23p40 production was assessed in plasma Peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) and monocytes. Mice with collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) were treated with anti-TNFα alone, anti-IL17 alone or a combination of the two. Efficacy of treatment and response was assessed from changes in Disease Activity Score 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate scores in patients, and in clinical scores and histological analysis in CIA. RESULTS: Significant increases in circulating Th17 cells were observed in patients after anti-TNFα therapy and this was accompanied by increased production of IL-12/23p40. There was an inverse relationship between baseline Th17 levels and the subsequent response of patients with RA to anti-TNFα therapy. In addition, PBLs from non-responder patients showed evidence of increased IL-17 production. Similarly, in anti-TNFα-treated mice, there was a strong correlation between IL-17 production and clinical score. Finally combined blockade of TNFα and IL-17 in CIA was more effective than monotherapy, particularly with respect to the duration of the therapeutic effect. CONCLUSIONS: These findings, which need to be confirmed in a larger cohort, suggest that a Th17-targeted therapeutic approach may be useful for anti-TNFα non-responder patients or as an adjunct to anti-TNFα therapy, provided that safety concerns can be addressed.
Authors: Fang Shen; Akash H Verma; Amy Volk; Brian Jones; Bianca M Coleman; Matthew J Loza; Ravi Malaviya; Beverley Moore; Daniel Weinstock; M Merle Elloso; Sarah L Gaffen; Tatiana Ort Journal: J Immunol Date: 2019-02-11 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Gwendolyn M Wilmes; Kimberly L Carey; Stuart W Hicks; Hugh H Russell; Jesse A Stevenson; Paulina Kocjan; Stephen R Lutz; Rachel S Quesenberry; Sergey V Shulga-Morskoy; Megan E Lewis; Ethan Clark; Violetta Medik; Anthony B Cooper; Elizabeth E Reczek Journal: MAbs Date: 2014-04-23 Impact factor: 5.857
Authors: Kenneth S Rosenthal; Katalin Mikecz; Harold L Steiner; Tibor T Glant; Alison Finnegan; Roy E Carambula; Daniel H Zimmerman Journal: Expert Rev Vaccines Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 5.217
Authors: Hatem A Elshabrawy; Abdul E Essani; Zoltán Szekanecz; David A Fox; Shiva Shahrara Journal: Autoimmun Rev Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 9.754