Literature DB >> 22549264

Minimally invasive esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis.

Steven N Hochwald1, Kfir Ben-David.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Thoracoscopic dissection of the esophagus and laparoscopic dissection of the stomach with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis is a safe method for resection of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction malignancy.
SETTING: The setting was at University Tertiary Care Center. PATIENTS: Subjects are patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction malignancy undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Technique of a 6-cm side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis is described.
RESULTS: The technique of minimally invasive esophagectomy with side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis is described.
CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic dissection of the esophagus, laparoscopic dissection of the stomach, and a side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis is safe, oncologically appropriate, and provides excellent functional results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22549264     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-1895-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  16 in total

1.  Technique of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy with intrathoracic stapled side-to-side anastomosis.

Authors:  Kfir Ben-David; George A Sarosi; Juan C Cendan; Steven N Hochwald
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  R J J Verhage; E J Hazebroek; J Boone; R Van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Minerva Chir       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Laparoscopic hand-assisted versus open transhiatal esophagectomy: a case-control study.

Authors:  K Q Bernabe; J S Bolton; W S Richardson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Decreasing morbidity and mortality in 100 consecutive minimally invasive esophagectomies.

Authors:  Kfir Ben-David; George A Sarosi; Juan C Cendan; Drew Howard; Georgios Rossidis; Steven N Hochwald
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Prone thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization for minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  T Fabian; A A McKelvey; M S Kent; J A Federico
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy is safe and effective following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Kfir Ben-David; George Rossidis; Robert A Zlotecki; Stephen R Grobmyer; Juan C Cendan; George A Sarosi; Steven N Hochwald
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a comparative study of transhiatal laparoscopic approach versus laparoscopic right transthoracic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Enrico Benzoni; Vittorio Bresadola; Giovanni Terrosu; Alessandro Uzzau; Carla Cedolini; Sergio Intini; Luigi Noce; Fabrizio Bresadola
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.719

8.  Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with esophagogastroplasty.

Authors:  A L DePaula; K Hashiba; E A Ferreira; R A de Paula; E Grecco
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1995-02

9.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy using the dexterity pneumo sleeve.

Authors:  C D Gerhart
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1998 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Minimally invasive approach to esophagectomy.

Authors:  J D Luketich; N T Nguyen; T Weigel; P Ferson; R Keenan; P Schauer
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1998 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  7 in total

1.  Nationwide analysis of short-term surgical outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for malignancy.

Authors:  Pragatheeshwar Thirunavukarasu; Emmanuel Gabriel; Kristopher Attwood; Moshim Kukar; Steven N Hochwald; Steven J Nurkin
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 6.071

2.  Combined laparoscopic-thoracoscopic esophagectomy and intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomsis.

Authors:  Meiqing Xu; Changqing Liu; Mingfa Guo; Xiangxiang Sun; Xiaohui Sun; Jing Luo; Jieyong Tian; Xianliang Jiang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Thoracoscopic and Laparoscopic Enucleation of Esophageal Leiomyomas.

Authors:  Kfir Ben-David; Juan Alvarez; Georgios Rossidis; Kenny Desart; Thomas Caranasos; Steven Hochwald
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Prospective Comprehensive Swallowing Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomies with Cervical Anastomosis: Silent Versus Vocal Aspiration.

Authors:  Kfir Ben-David; Amy Fullerton; Georgios Rossidis; Michael Michel; Ryan Thomas; George Sarosi; Jeff White; Christopher Giordano; Steven Hochwald
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Pathologic Complete Response Is an Independent Predictor of Improved Survival Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Raed M Alnaji; William Du; Emmanuel Gabriel; Smit Singla; Kristopher Attwood; Hector Nava; Usha Malhotra; Steven N Hochwald; Moshim Kukar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Fluorescent image-based evaluation of gastric conduit perfusion in a preclinical ischemia model.

Authors:  Yu Hua Quan; Minji Kim; Hyun Koo Kim; Beop-Min Kim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  A comparison of cervical delta-shaped anastomosis and circular stapled anastomosis after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Chen Huang; Xunhai Xu; Binbin Zhuang; Wenshu Chen; Xunyu Xu; Chao Wang; Shengmei Lin
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 2.754

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.