Literature DB >> 22547595

Chromosomal instability (CIN) phenotype, CIN high or CIN low, predicts survival for colorectal cancer.

Toshiaki Watanabe1, Takashi Kobunai, Yoko Yamamoto, Keiji Matsuda, Soichiro Ishihara, Keijiro Nozawa, Hideki Yamada, Tamuro Hayama, Eisuke Inoue, Junko Tamura, Hisae Iinuma, Takashi Akiyoshi, Tetsuichiro Muto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine whether chromosomal instability (CIN) phenotype, determined by the severity of CIN, can predict survival for stages II and III colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We determined microsatellite instability (MSI) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) status in 1,103 patients (training [n = 845] and validation [n = 258] sets with stages II and III CRC). The LOH ratio was defined as the frequency of LOH in chromosomes 2p, 5q, 17p, and 18q. According to the LOH ratio, non-MSI high tumors were classified as CIN high (LOH ratio ≥ 33%) or CIN low (LOH ratio < 33%). CIN-high tumors were subclassified as CIN high (mild type; LOH ratio < 75%) or CIN high (severe type; LOH ratio ≥ 75%). We used microarrays to identify a gene signature that could classify the CIN phenotype and evaluated its ability to predict prognosis.
RESULTS: CIN high showed the worst survival (P < .001), whereas there was no significant difference between CIN low and MSI high. CIN high (severe type) showed poorer survival than CIN high (mild type; P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that CIN phenotype was an independent risk factor for disease-free and overall survival, respectively, in both the training (P < .001 and P = .0155) and validation sets (P < .001 and P = .0076). Microarray analysis also revealed that survival was significantly poorer in those with the CIN-high than in the CIN-low gene signature (P = .0203). In a validation of 290 independent CRCs (GSE14333), the CIN-high gene signature showed significantly poorer survival than the CIN-low signature (P = .0047).
CONCLUSION: The CIN phenotype is a predictive marker for survival and may be used to select high-risk patients with stages II and III CRC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22547595     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.6490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  43 in total

1.  MIIP haploinsufficiency induces chromosomal instability and promotes tumour progression in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yan Sun; Ping Ji; Tao Chen; Xinhui Zhou; Da Yang; Yuhong Guo; Yuexin Liu; Limei Hu; Dianren Xia; Yanxue Liu; Asha S Multani; Ilya Shmulevich; Raju Kucherlapati; Scott Kopetz; Anil K Sood; Stanley R Hamilton; Baocun Sun; Wei Zhang
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 7.996

2.  Tumor-promoting/progressing role of additional chromosome instability in hepatic carcinogenesis in Sgo1 (Shugoshin 1) haploinsufficient mice.

Authors:  Hiroshi Y Yamada; Yuting Zhang; Arun Reddy; Altaf Mohammed; Stan Lightfoot; Wei Dai; Chinthalapally V Rao
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 4.944

3.  2n or not 2n: Aneuploidy, polyploidy and chromosomal instability in primary and tumor cells.

Authors:  Lauren M Zasadil; Eric M C Britigan; Beth A Weaver
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 7.727

4.  Longitudinal molecular characterization of endoscopic specimens from colorectal lesions.

Authors:  Petra Minarikova; Lucie Benesova; Tereza Halkova; Barbora Belsanova; Stepan Suchanek; Jiri Cyrany; Inna Tuckova; Jan Bures; Miroslav Zavoral; Marek Minarik
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Colorectal cancer tumour markers and biomarkers: Recent therapeutic advances.

Authors:  Gustaw Lech; Robert Słotwiński; Maciej Słodkowski; Ireneusz Wojciech Krasnodębski
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Revisiting tumour aneuploidy - the place of ploidy assessment in the molecular era.

Authors:  Håvard E Danielsen; Manohar Pradhan; Marco Novelli
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 7.  Stage-specific frequency and prognostic significance of aneuploidy in patients with sporadic colorectal cancer--a meta-analysis and current overview.

Authors:  Tilman Laubert; Sandra Freitag-Wolf; Michael Linnebacher; Alexandra König; Brigitte Vollmar; Jens K Habermann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  Molecular subtyping of colorectal cancer: Recent progress, new challenges and emerging opportunities.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Raju Kandimalla; Hao Huang; Lina Zhu; Ying Li; Feng Gao; Ajay Goel; Xin Wang
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 15.707

9.  The Long Noncoding RNA CCAT2 Induces Chromosomal Instability Through BOP1-AURKB Signaling.

Authors:  Baoqing Chen; Mihnea P Dragomir; Linda Fabris; Recep Bayraktar; Erik Knutsen; Xu Liu; Changyan Tang; Yongfeng Li; Tadanobu Shimura; Tina Catela Ivkovic; Mireia Cruz De Los Santos; Simone Anfossi; Masayoshi Shimizu; Maitri Y Shah; Hui Ling; Peng Shen; Asha S Multani; Barbara Pardini; Jared K Burks; Hiroyuki Katayama; Lucas C Reineke; Longfei Huo; Muddassir Syed; Shumei Song; Manuela Ferracin; Eiji Oki; Bastian Fromm; Cristina Ivan; Krithika Bhuvaneshwar; Yuriy Gusev; Koshi Mimori; David Menter; Subrata Sen; Takatoshi Matsuyama; Hiroyuki Uetake; Catalin Vasilescu; Scott Kopetz; Jan Parker-Thornburg; Ayumu Taguchi; Samir M Hanash; Leonard Girnita; Ondrej Slaby; Ajay Goel; Gabriele Varani; Mihai Gagea; Chunlai Li; Jaffer A Ajani; George A Calin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 10.  Establishing a biological profile for interval colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Amy L Cisyk; Harminder Singh; Kirk J McManus
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.