Literature DB >> 22547387

Diagnostic accuracy of dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients.

Steffen Hahn1, Jennifer Hecktor, Florian Grabellus, Verena Hartung, Thorsten Pöppel, Rainer Kimmig, Michael Forsting, Gerald Antoch, Till A Heusner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/CT for the detection of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients acquired 60 min after FDG administration is reported to be only moderate, especially due to low sensitivity.
PURPOSE: To test whether a delayed scan 90 min after FDG administration could enhance the diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/CT for the detection of axillary lymph node metastases.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-eight women suffering from primary breast cancer (mean age 52 years; range 25-78 years; standard deviation 14 years) underwent a pre-therapeutic dual-time-point FDG-PET/CT scan. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of axillary lymph nodes was measured at two different time points (time point T1: 60 min after FDG injection, time point T2: 90 min after FDG injection). SUVmax of axillary lymph nodes at T1 and T2 were assessed for statistical significance using a paired Wilcoxon-Test (P < 0.05). At T1 a qualitative analysis of the FDG-PET/CT scan was performed to define physiologic and metastatic lymph nodes. At T2 an increase of the SUVmax of at least 3.75% over time was rated as indicating malignancy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and the accuracy of FDG-PET/CT for the detection of axillary lymph node metastases was calculated at time points T1 and T2. Statistically significant differences were determined using Fisher's exact test (P < 0.05). Histopathology served as the standard of reference. A compartment based analysis was done.
RESULTS: Axillary lymph nodes had a mean SUVmax of 1.6 (range 0.6-10.8; SD 1.9) at T1 and a mean SUVmax of 1.8 (range 0.5-17.9; SD 3.5) at T2. This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.047). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of FDG-PET/CT for the detection of axillary lymph node metastases was 81%, 100%, 100%, 88%, and 92% at T1, and 88%, 50%, 56%, 85%, and 66% at T2, respectively. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.27).
CONCLUSION: There is a slight increase of the FDG accumulation of axillary lymph nodes between 60 and 90 min after FDG administration. This increase did not translate into a statistical significant enhancement of the diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/CT for the detection of axillary lymph nodes. Especially due to false-positive results a delayed FDG-PET/CT scan 90 min after FDG administration is not able to enhance the diagnostic accuracy for the detection of lymph node metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22547387     DOI: 10.1258/ar.2012.110420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  7 in total

Review 1.  The Evolving Role of FDG-PET/CT in the Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Koosha Paydary; Siavash Mehdizadeh Seraj; Mahdi Zirakchian Zadeh; Sahra Emamzadehfard; Sara Pourhassan Shamchi; Saeid Gholami; Thomas J Werner; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 2.  Diagnosis and evaluation of gastric cancer by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Chen-Xi Wu; Zhao-Hui Zhu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Thoracic staging with 18F-FDG PET/MR in non-small cell lung cancer - does it change therapeutic decisions in comparison to 18F-FDG PET/CT?

Authors:  Benedikt M Schaarschmidt; Johannes Grueneisen; Martin Metzenmacher; Benedikt Gomez; Thomas Gauler; Christian Roesel; Philipp Heusch; Verena Ruhlmann; Lale Umutlu; Gerald Antoch; Christian Buchbender
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  When should we recommend use of dual time-point and delayed time-point imaging techniques in FDG PET?

Authors:  Gang Cheng; Drew A Torigian; Hongming Zhuang; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Locoregional tumour evaluation of squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck area: a comparison between MRI, PET/CT and integrated PET/MRI.

Authors:  Benedikt Michael Schaarschmidt; Philipp Heusch; Christian Buchbender; Marcus Ruhlmann; Christoph Bergmann; Verena Ruhlmann; Marc Schlamann; Gerald Antoch; Michael Forsting; Axel Wetter
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  The application of positron emission tomography (PET/CT) in diagnosis of breast cancer. Part II. Diagnosis after treatment initiation, future perspectives.

Authors:  Elżbieta Jodłowska; Rafał Czepczyński; Agata Czarnywojtek; Amanda Rewers; Grażyna Jarząbek; Witold Kędzia; Marek Ruchała
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2016-08-04

7.  18F-FDG PET/CT oncologic imaging at extended injection-to-scan acquisition time intervals derived from a single-institution 18F-FDG-directed surgery experience: feasibility and quantification of 18F-FDG accumulation within 18F-FDG-avid lesions and background tissues.

Authors:  Stephen P Povoski; Douglas A Murrey; Sabrina M Smith; Edward W Martin; Nathan C Hall
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 4.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.