Literature DB >> 22547266

Mammographic system performance using an image reading qualification method.

Silvio R Pires1, Regina B Medeiros.   

Abstract

Our goal was to evaluate mammography systems based on microcalcifications and fiber detection using a statistical phantom (ALVIM, model TRM 18-209, Nuclear Associates) image readings. ALVIM phantom images were acquired under diverse exposure conditions with various equipments, and 5 radiologists with similar expertise reported their findings. The reading performance in the detection of microcalcifications and fibers of different sizes was measured by simulation of equivalent breast tissue with 4.5 and 6.5 cm thicknesses. We determined kappa values, ROC curves, and kappa probability density and detection rates with dedicated software developed locally. The statistical results generated three kappa (K) ranges that allowed quantification of the detection performance at three quality levels: unacceptable (K ≤ 0.64), achievable (K ≥ 0.70) and acceptable (0.64 < K < 0.70). An extensive database permitted a comparison of the reading performance with 99.5% reliability (p < 0.005). The comparison showed a larger dispersion of the kappa values for the images with low contrast generated with mammography equipment which was not properly calibrated, showing that the method is able to detect the performance changes associated with the loss of image quality.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22547266     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-012-0156-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  12 in total

1.  Statistical approach for image quality evaluation in daily medical practice.

Authors:  V A Gurvich
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Elodia B Cole; Emily O Kistner; Keith E Muller; Bradley M Hemminger; Mary L Brown; R Eugene Johnston; Cherie M Kuzmiak; M Patricia Braeuning; Rita I Freimanis; Mary Scott Soo; J A Baker; Ruth Walsh
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology.

Authors:  Nancy A Obuchowski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Application of StatPhantom software for image quality evaluation.

Authors:  George Davydenko; Victor Gurvich; Mark Smekhov
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2002-03-21       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Image quality of digital direct flat-panel mammography versus an analog screen-film technique using a phantom model.

Authors:  Kathrin Barbara Krug; Hartmut Stützer; Ralf Girnus; Markus Zähringer; Axel Gossmann; Guido Winnekendonk; Klaus Lackner
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  The use of a contrast-detail test object in the optimization of optical density in mammography.

Authors:  K J Robson; C J Kotre; K Faulkner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Constantine Gatsonis; Edward Hendrick; Martin Yaffe; Janet K Baum; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Emily F Conant; Laurie L Fajardo; Lawrence Bassett; Carl D'Orsi; Roberta Jong; Murray Rebner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.

Authors:  Per Skaane; Corinne Balleyguier; Felix Diekmann; Susanne Diekmann; Jean-Charles Piguet; Kari Young; Loren T Niklason
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Radiographic viewing conditions at Johannesburg Hospital.

Authors:  T Nyathi; An Mwale; P Segone; Sh Mhlanga; Ml Pule
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2008-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.