Literature DB >> 22546388

Role of isotope selection in long-term outcomes in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with a combination of external beam radiotherapy and low-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy.

A Gabriella Wernicke1, Michael Shamis, Weisi Yan, Samuel Trichter, Albert M Sabbas, Yevgenia Goltser, Paul J Christos, Jennifer S Brennan, Bhupesh Parashar, Dattatreyudu Nori.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the rates of long-term biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) with respect to isotope in intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy.
METHODS: A total of 242 consecutive patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated with iodine-125 ((125)I) or palladium-103 ((103)Pd) implants after EBRT (range 45.0-50.4 Gy) from 1996 to 2002. Of the 242 patients, 119 (49.2%) were treated with (125)I and 123 (50.8%) with (103)Pd. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to analyze BRFS, defined according to the Phoenix definition (prostate-specific antigen nadir plus 2 ng/mL) with respect to Gleason score, stage, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level, and source selection. Late genitourinary/gastrointestinal toxicities were assessed using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer scale.
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 10 years, the BRFS rate was 77.3%. A statistically significant difference was found in the 10-year BRFS rate between the (125)I- and (103)Pd-treated groups (82.7% and 70.6%, respectively; P = .001). The addition of hormonal therapy did not improve the 10-year BRFS rate (77.6%) compared with RT alone (77.1%; P = .22). However, a statistically significant difference in the BRFS rate was found with the addition of hormonal therapy to (103)Pd, improving the 10-year BRFS rate for (73.8%) compared with (103)Pd alone (69.1%; P = .008). On multivariate analysis, isotope type ((103)Pd vs (125)I), pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level >10 ng/mL, and greater tumor stage increased the risk of recurrence by 2.6-fold (P = .007), 5.9-fold (P < .0001), and 1.7-fold (P = .14), respectively.
CONCLUSION: (125)I renders a superior rate of BRFS compared with (103)Pd when used with EBRT. Hormonal therapy does not provide additional benefit in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with a combination of EBRT and brachytherapy, except for the addition of hormonal therapy to (103)Pd.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22546388      PMCID: PMC3623292          DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.01.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  25 in total

1.  Combined 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and transperineal Pd-103 permanent implantation for patients with intermediate and unfavorable risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  A Singh; M J Zelefsky; A Raben; D Lombardi; S A Leibel
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2000-10-20       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Impact of hormonal therapy on intermediate risk prostate cancer treated with combination brachytherapy and external beam irradiation.

Authors:  Richard G Stock; Swati Yalamanchi; Swati Yamalachi; Simon J Hall; Nelson N Stone
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  A comparison of radiation dose to the bulb of the penis in men with and without prostate brachytherapy-induced erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  G S Merrick; K Wallner; W M Butler; R W Galbreath; J H Lief; M L Benson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  A comprehensive review of CT-based dosimetry parameters and biochemical control in patients treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  L Potters; Y Cao; E Calugaru; T Torre; P Fearn; X H Wang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  High dose radiation delivered by intensity modulated conformal radiotherapy improves the outcome of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  M J Zelefsky; Z Fuks; M Hunt; H J Lee; D Lombardi; C C Ling; V E Reuter; E S Venkatraman; S A Leibel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Modern prostate brachytherapy. Prostate specific antigen results in 219 patients with up to 12 years of observed follow-up.

Authors:  H Ragde; L J Korb; A A Elgamal; G L Grado; B S Nadir
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Effects of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on prostate biopsy results after (125)I and (103)Pd seed implantation.

Authors:  N N Stone; R G Stock; P Unger
Journal:  Mol Urol       Date:  2000

8.  Ten-year biochemical relapse-free survival after external beam radiation and brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer: the Seattle experience.

Authors:  John E Sylvester; John C Blasko; Peter D Grimm; Robert Meier; Judith A Malmgren
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Biochemical outcome for hormone-naïve patients with high-risk prostate cancer managed with permanent interstitial brachytherapy and supplemental external-beam radiation.

Authors:  Gregory S Merrick; Wayne M Butler; Jonathan H Lief; Robert W Galbreath; Edward Adamovich
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

10.  The 1999 patterns of care study of radiotherapy in localized prostate carcinoma: a comprehensive survey of prostate brachytherapy in the United States.

Authors:  W Robert Lee; Jennifer Moughan; Jean B Owen; Michael J Zelefsky
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.