Literature DB >> 22546338

High frequency stimulation alters motor maps, impairs skilled reaching performance and is accompanied by an upregulation of specific GABA, glutamate and NMDA receptor subunits.

A K Henderson1, Q J Pittman, G C Teskey.   

Abstract

High frequency stimulation (HFS) has the potential to interfere with learning and memory. HFS and motor skill training both lead to potentiation of the stimulated network and alter motor map expression. However, the extent to which HFS can interfere with the learning and performance of a skilled motor task and the resulting effect on the representation of movement has not been examined. Moreover, the molecular mechanisms associated with HFS and skilled motor training on the motor cortex are not known. We hypothesized that HFS would impair performance on a skilled reaching task, and would be associated with alterations in motor map expression and protein levels compared to non-stimulated and untrained controls. Long Evans Hooded rats were chronically implanted with stimulating and recording electrodes in the corpus callosum and frontal neocortex, respectively. High frequency theta burst stimulation or sham stimulation was applied once daily for 20 sessions. The rats were divided into five groups: control, HFS and assessed at 1 week post stimulation, HFS and assessed 3 weeks post stimulation, reach trained, and HFS and reach trained. A subset of rats from each group was assessed with either intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) to examine motor map expression or Western blot techniques to determine protein expression of several excitatory and inhibitory receptor subunits. Firstly, we found that HFS resulted in larger and reorganized motor maps, and lower movement thresholds compared to controls. This was associated with an up-regulation of the GABA(A)α1 and NR1 receptor subunits 3 weeks after the last stimulation session only. Stimulation affected skilled reaching performance in a subset of all stimulated rats. Rats that were poor performers had larger rostral forelimb areas, higher proximal and lower distal movement thresholds compared to rats that were good performers after stimulation. Reach training alone was associated with an up-regulation of GABA(A)α1, α2, GluR2, NR1 and NR2A compared to controls. HFS and reach-trained rats showed an up-regulation of GABA(A)α2 compared to stimulated rats that were not reach-trained. Therefore, we have shown that HFS induces significant plasticity in the motor cortex, and has the potential to disrupt performance on a skilled motor task.
Copyright © 2012 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22546338     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.04.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  10 in total

1.  Adaptive changes in the motor cortex during and after longterm forelimb immobilization in adult rats.

Authors:  Riccardo Viaro; Mirco Budri; Pierantonio Parmiani; Gianfranco Franchi
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  HCN channels segregate stimulation-evoked movement responses in neocortex and allow for coordinated forelimb movements in rodents.

Authors:  Jeffery A Boychuk; Jordan S Farrell; Laura A Palmer; Anna C Singleton; Quentin J Pittman; G Campbell Teskey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Improvement in Gait and Participation in a Child with Angelman Syndrome after Translingual Neurostimulation Associated with Goal-Oriented Therapy: A Case Report.

Authors:  Delphine Gaudin-Drouelle; Laetitia Houx; Mathieu Lempereur; Sylvain Brochard; Christelle Pons
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-13

4.  Restoration of function after brain damage using a neural prosthesis.

Authors:  David J Guggenmos; Meysam Azin; Scott Barbay; Jonathan D Mahnken; Caleb Dunham; Pedram Mohseni; Randolph J Nudo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Electrifying the motor engram: effects of tDCS on motor learning and control.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Matrix Metalloprotease 3 Activity Supports Hippocampal EPSP-to-Spike Plasticity Following Patterned Neuronal Activity via the Regulation of NMDAR Function and Calcium Flux.

Authors:  Patrycja Brzdąk; Jakub Włodarczyk; Jerzy W Mozrzymas; Tomasz Wójtowicz
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 5.590

7.  GluN1 and GluN2A NMDA Receptor Subunits Increase in the Hippocampus during Memory Consolidation in the Rat.

Authors:  Magali C Cercato; Cecilia A Vázquez; Edgar Kornisiuk; Alejandra I Aguirre; Natalia Colettis; Marina Snitcofsky; Diana A Jerusalinsky; María V Baez
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 8.  NMDA Receptor Subunits Change after Synaptic Plasticity Induction and Learning and Memory Acquisition.

Authors:  María Verónica Baez; Magalí Cecilia Cercato; Diana Alicia Jerusalinsky
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  NMDA receptor subunits in the adult rat hippocampus undergo similar changes after 5 minutes in an open field and after LTP induction.

Authors:  Maria Veronica Baez; Maria Victoria Oberholzer; Magali Cecilia Cercato; Marina Snitcofsky; Alejandra Ines Aguirre; Diana Alicia Jerusalinsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Simultaneous intrathecal injection of muscimol and endomorphin-1 alleviates neuropathic pain in rat model of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Marjan Hosseini; Zohreh Karami; Mahmood Yousefifard; Atousa Janzadeh; Elham Zamani; Farinaz Nasirinezhad
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 2.708

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.