Literature DB >> 22545788

Lack of a benign interpretation bias in social anxiety disorder.

Nader Amir1, Caroline Prouvost, Jennie M Kuckertz.   

Abstract

Cognitive models of social anxiety posit that recurrent interpretation of ambiguous information as threatening maintains symptoms (e.g. Clark & Wells, 1995, pp. 69-93, Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment. New York: Guilford Press; Rapee & Heimberg, 1997, pp. 741-756, Behavior Research and Therapy, 35). However, biased interpretation may also be represented as a failure to make a benign interpretation of the ambiguous event. Furthermore, interpretation bias can be characterized by both an online (automatic) component and an offline (effortful) component (Hirsch & Clark, 2004, pp. 799-825, Clinical Psychology Review, 24). To measure both benign and threat biases, as well as examine the effect of social anxiety on offline versus online interpretations, Beard and Amir (2009, pp. 1135-1141, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46) developed the Word Sentence Association Paradigm (WSAP). In the current study, we administered the WSAP to a group of participants diagnosed with social anxiety disorder (SAD) as well as to a group of non-anxious control (NAC) participants. We found that participants with SAD demonstrated a lack of benign online bias, but not an online threat bias when compared to NACs. However, when examining offline biases, SAD patients endorsed social threat interpretations and rejected benign social interpretations to a greater degree than non-anxious individuals. Our results, when taken together, clearly implicate the role of reduced bias toward benign information in SAD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22545788      PMCID: PMC3708600          DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2012.662655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Behav Ther        ISSN: 1650-6073


  21 in total

1.  An anxiety-related bias in semantic activation when processing threat/neutral homographs.

Authors:  A Richards; C C French
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1992-10

2.  Interpretative inferences when reading about emotional events.

Authors:  C Hirsch; A Mathews
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1997-12

3.  Social phobia.

Authors:  M R Liebowitz
Journal:  Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry       Date:  1987

4.  A psychometric study of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.

Authors:  N V Ramanaiah; M Franzen; T Schill
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  1983-10

5.  Impaired positive inferential bias in social phobia.

Authors:  C R Hirsch; A Mathews
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2000-11

6.  Effects of training on interpretation of emotional ambiguity.

Authors:  S Grey; A Mathews
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-11

Review 7.  Information-processing bias in social phobia.

Authors:  Colette R Hirsch; David M Clark
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-11

8.  Negative interpretation bias in social phobia.

Authors:  N Amin; E B Foa; M E Coles
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1998-10

9.  Screening for social anxiety disorder with the self-report version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale.

Authors:  Nina K Rytwinski; David M Fresco; Richard G Heimberg; Meredith E Coles; Michael R Liebowitz; Shadha Cissell; Murray B Stein; Stefan G Hofmann
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.505

10.  The liebowitz social anxiety scale as a self-report instrument: a preliminary psychometric analysis.

Authors:  Sandra L Baker; Nina Heinrichs; Hyo-Jin Kim; Stefan G Hofmann
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2002-06
View more
  10 in total

1.  Development of the Interpretation Bias Index for PTSD.

Authors:  Joseph W Boffa; Aaron M Norr; Jamie L Tock; Nader Amir; Norman B Schmidt
Journal:  Cognit Ther Res       Date:  2018-04-23

2.  Intolerance for approach of ambiguity in social anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Jennie M Kuckertz; Marlene V Strege; Nader Amir
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2016-02-19

3.  Social anxiety is characterized by biased learning about performance and the self.

Authors:  Leonie Koban; Rebecca Schneider; Yoni K Ashar; Jessica R Andrews-Hanna; Lauren Landy; David A Moscovitch; Tor D Wager; Joanna J Arch
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2017-03-30

4.  Ethnic differences in behavioral and physiological indicators of sensitivity to threat.

Authors:  Kelly A Correa; Vivian Carrillo; Carter J Funkhouser; Elyse R Shenberger; Stewart A Shankman
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2021-11-25

5.  Threat and benign interpretation bias might not be a unidimensional construct.

Authors:  Shari A Steinman; Sam Portnow; Amber L Billingsley; Diheng Zhang; Bethany A Teachman
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2019-10-25

6.  The Reliability and Validity of Response-Based Measures of Attention Bias.

Authors:  Emily E E Meissel; Huiting Liu; Elizabeth S Stevens; Travis C Evans; Jennifer C Britton; Allison M Letkiewicz; Stewart A Shankman
Journal:  Cognit Ther Res       Date:  2021-02-17

7.  Negativity-bias in forming beliefs about own abilities.

Authors:  Laura Müller-Pinzler; Nora Czekalla; Annalina V Mayer; David S Stolz; Valeria Gazzola; Christian Keysers; Frieder M Paulus; Sören Krach
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A New Social Picture Task to Assess Interpretation Bias related to social fears in adolescents.

Authors:  Lisan A Henricks; Wolf-Gero Lange; Maartje Luijten; Eni S Becker
Journal:  Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol       Date:  2022-04-18

Review 9.  When change is the only constant: The promise of longitudinal neuroimaging in understanding social anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Simone P W Haller; Kathryn L Mills; Charlotte E Hartwright; Anthony S David; Kathrin Cohen Kadosh
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 5.811

10.  Impact of cognitive-behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder on the neural bases of emotional reactivity to and regulation of social evaluation.

Authors:  Philippe R Goldin; Michal Ziv; Hooria Jazaieri; Justin Weeks; Richard G Heimberg; James J Gross
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2014-08-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.