OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether the self-report version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS-SR) could accurately identify individuals with social anxiety disorder and individuals with the generalized subtype of social anxiety disorder. Furthermore, the study sought to determine the optimal cutoffs for the LSAS-SR for identifying patients with social anxiety disorder and its generalized subtype. METHODS: Two hundred and ninety-one patients with clinician-assessed social anxiety disorder (240 with generalized social anxiety disorder) and 53 control participants who were free from current Axis-1 disorders completed the LSAS-SR. RESULTS: Receiver Operating Characteristic analyses revealed that the LSAS-SR performed well in identifying participants with social anxiety disorder and generalized social anxiety disorder. Consistent with Mennin et al.'s [2002: J Anxiety Disord 16:661-673] research on the clinician-administered version of the LSAS, cutoffs of 30 and 60 on the LSAS-SR provided the best balance of sensitivity and specificity for classifying participants with social anxiety and generalized social anxiety disorder, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The LSAS-SR may be an accurate and cost-effective way to identify and subtype patients with social anxiety disorder, which could help increase the percentage of people who receive appropriate treatment for this debilitating disorder. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether the self-report version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS-SR) could accurately identify individuals with social anxiety disorder and individuals with the generalized subtype of social anxiety disorder. Furthermore, the study sought to determine the optimal cutoffs for the LSAS-SR for identifying patients with social anxiety disorder and its generalized subtype. METHODS: Two hundred and ninety-one patients with clinician-assessed social anxiety disorder (240 with generalized social anxiety disorder) and 53 control participants who were free from current Axis-1 disorders completed the LSAS-SR. RESULTS: Receiver Operating Characteristic analyses revealed that the LSAS-SR performed well in identifying participants with social anxiety disorder and generalized social anxiety disorder. Consistent with Mennin et al.'s [2002: J Anxiety Disord 16:661-673] research on the clinician-administered version of the LSAS, cutoffs of 30 and 60 on the LSAS-SR provided the best balance of sensitivity and specificity for classifying participants with social anxiety and generalized social anxiety disorder, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The LSAS-SR may be an accurate and cost-effective way to identify and subtype patients with social anxiety disorder, which could help increase the percentage of people who receive appropriate treatment for this debilitating disorder. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Jennifer C Britton; Jenna G Suway; Michelle A Clementi; Nathan A Fox; Daniel S Pine; Yair Bar-Haim Journal: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Date: 2014-10-24 Impact factor: 3.436
Authors: Carina Y Heitmann; Jutta Peterburs; Martin Mothes-Lasch; Marlit C Hallfarth; Stephanie Böhme; Wolfgang H R Miltner; Thomas Straube Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Rachel M Butler; Matthew T Boden; Thomas M Olino; Amanda S Morrison; Philippe R Goldin; James J Gross; Richard G Heimberg Journal: J Anxiety Disord Date: 2018-03-09
Authors: Kate R Kuhlman; Michael Treanor; Gabriella Imbriano; Michelle G Craske Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2020-03-20 Impact factor: 4.905