Literature DB >> 22545675

On the value of homology models for virtual screening: discovering hCXCR3 antagonists by pharmacophore-based and structure-based approaches.

Dane Huang1, Qiong Gu, Hu Ge, Jiming Ye, Noeris K Salam, Arnie Hagler, Hongzhuan Chen, Jun Xu.   

Abstract

Human chemokine receptor CXCR3 (hCXCR3) antagonists have potential therapeutic applications as antivirus, antitumor, and anti-inflammatory agents. A novel virtual screening protocol, which combines pharmacophore-based and structure-based approaches, was proposed. A three-dimensional QSAR pharmacophore model and a structure-based docking model were built to virtually screen for hCXCR3 antagonists. The hCXCR3 antagonist binding site was constructed by homology modeling and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. By combining the structure-based and ligand-based screenings results, 95% of the compounds satisfied either pharmacophore or docking score criteria and would be chosen as hits if the union of the two searches was taken. The false negative rates were 15% for the pharmacophore model, 14% for the homology model, and 5% for the combined model. Therefore, the consistency of the pharmacophore model and the structural binding model is 219/273 = 80%. The hit rate for the virtual screening protocol is 273/286 = 95%. This work demonstrated that the quality of both the pharmacophore model and homology model can be measured by the consistency of the two models, and the false negatives in virtual screening can be reduced by combining two virtual screening approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22545675     DOI: 10.1021/ci300067q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  6 in total

1.  Effect of Binding Pose and Modeled Structures on SVMGen and GlideScore Enrichment of Chemical Libraries.

Authors:  David Xu; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 2.  Structural Analysis of Chemokine Receptor-Ligand Interactions.

Authors:  Marta Arimont; Shan-Liang Sun; Rob Leurs; Martine Smit; Iwan J P de Esch; Chris de Graaf
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Orphan receptor ligand discovery by pickpocketing pharmacological neighbors.

Authors:  Tony Ngo; Andrey V Ilatovskiy; Alastair G Stewart; James L J Coleman; Fiona M McRobb; R Peter Riek; Robert M Graham; Ruben Abagyan; Irina Kufareva; Nicola J Smith
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 15.040

4.  Maximal Unbiased Benchmarking Data Sets for Human Chemokine Receptors and Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Jie Xia; Terry-Elinor Reid; Song Wu; Liangren Zhang; Xiang Simon Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Identification, design and bio-evaluation of novel Hsp90 inhibitors by ligand-based virtual screening.

Authors:  JianMin Jia; XiaoLi Xu; Fang Liu; XiaoKe Guo; MingYe Zhang; MengChen Lu; LiLi Xu; JinLian Wei; Jia Zhu; ShengLie Zhang; ShengMiao Zhang; HaoPeng Sun; QiDong You
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Computational Study of C-X-C Chemokine Receptor (CXCR)3 Binding with Its Natural Agonists Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligand (CXCL)9, 10 and 11 and with Synthetic Antagonists: Insights of Receptor Activation towards Drug Design for Vitiligo.

Authors:  Giovanny Aguilera-Durán; Antonio Romo-Mancillas
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 4.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.