Literature DB >> 22545611

Speaker knowledge influences the comprehension of pragmatic inferences.

Leon Bergen1, Daniel J Grodner.   

Abstract

Inferring what speakers mean from what they say requires consideration of what they know. For instance, depending on the speaker's level of expertise, uttering Some squirrels hibernate can imply that not all squirrels hibernate, or it might imply the weaker proposition that the speaker does not know whether all squirrels hibernate. The present study examines the extent to which speaker knowledge influences implied meanings as well as the timing of any such influence. Using a self-paced presentation, participants read sentences containing some in contexts where a speaker should know whether all was true, or where the speaker merely might know whether all was true. This knowledge manipulation was found to have immediate and reliable effects on the type of inference that was drawn. In contrast, knowledge played no role when the same meanings were conveyed literally. This work thus demonstrates that perceivers consider the speaker's knowledge state incrementally to establish the speaker's communicative goals. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22545611     DOI: 10.1037/a0027850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  17 in total

1.  Speaker-Specific Cues Influence Semantic Disambiguation.

Authors:  Catherine Davies; Vincent Porretta; Kremena Koleva; Ekaterini Klepousniotou
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2022-05-12

2.  The Neural Computation of Scalar Implicature.

Authors:  Joshua K Hartshorne; Jesse Snedeker; Stephanie Yen-Mun Liem Azar; Albert E Kim
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 2.331

3.  Some inferences still take time: Prosody, predictability, and the speed of scalar implicatures.

Authors:  Yi Ting Huang; Jesse Snedeker
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Accommodation to an Unlikely Episodic State.

Authors:  Charles Clifton; Lyn Frazier
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Scalar implicatures: working memory and a comparison with only.

Authors:  Paul P Marty; Emmanuel Chemla
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-18

6.  Some Alternatives? Event-Related Potential Investigation of Literal and Pragmatic Interpretations of Some Presented in Isolation.

Authors:  Cécile Barbet; Guillaume Thierry
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-30

7.  Scalar and Ignorance Inferences Are Both Computed Immediately upon Encountering the Sentential Connective: The Online Processing of Sentences with Disjunction Using the Visual World Paradigm.

Authors:  Likan Zhan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-31

8.  The realization of scalar inferences: context sensitivity without processing cost.

Authors:  Stephen Politzer-Ahles; Robert Fiorentino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Involvement of prefrontal cortex in scalar implicatures: evidence from magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Stephen Politzer-Ahles; Laura Gwilliams
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  The impact of foreign accent on irony interpretation.

Authors:  Sendy Caffarra; Elissa Michell; Clara D Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.