Literature DB >> 2254546

Ventricular stroke work loss: validation of a method of quantifying the severity of aortic stenosis and derivation of an orifice formula.

D C Sprigings1, J B Chambers, T Cochrane, J Allen, G Jackson.   

Abstract

Because aortic stenosis results in the loss of left ventricular stroke work (due to resistance to flow through the valve and turbulence in the aorta), the percentage of stroke work that is lost may reflect the severity of stenosis. This index can be calculated from pressure data alone. The relation between percent stroke work loss and anatomic aortic valve orifice area (measured by planimetry from videotape) was investigated in a pulsatile flow model. Thirteen valves were studied (nine human aortic valves obtained at necropsy and four bioprosthetic valves) at stroke volumes of 40 to 100 ml, giving 57 data points. Valve area ranged from 0.3 to 2.8 cm2 and mean systolic pressure gradient from 3 to 84 mm Hg. Percent stroke work loss, calculated as mean systolic pressure gradient divided by mean ventricular systolic pressure x 100%, ranged from 7 to 68%. It was closely related to anatomic orifice area with an inverse exponential relation and was not significantly related to flow (r = -0.15). An orifice formula was derived that predicted anatomic orifice area with a 95% confidence interval of +/- 0.5 cm2 (orifice area [cm2] = 4.82 [2.39 x log percent stroke work loss], r = -0.94, SEE = 0.029). These results support the clinical use of percent stroke work loss as an easily obtained index of the severity of aortic stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2254546     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90309-d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  7 in total

1.  Effects of increasing flow rate on aortic stenotic indices: evidence from percutaneous transvenous balloon dilatation of the mitral valve in patients with combined aortic and mitral stenosis.

Authors:  T M Lee; S F Su; M F Chen; C S Liau; Y T Lee
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Experimental analysis of fluid mechanical energy losses in aortic valve stenosis: importance of pressure recovery.

Authors:  R S Heinrich; A A Fontaine; R Y Grimes; A Sidhaye; S Yang; K E Moore; R A Levine; A P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Impact of blood pressure on the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Stephen H Little; Kwan-Leung Chan; Ian G Burwash
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Influence of stenotic valve geometry on measured pressure gradients and ventricular work: the relationship between morphology and flow.

Authors:  E G Cape; D L Kelly; J A Ettedgui; S C Park
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  Risk stratification and management of aortic stenosis with concomitant left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Matthew L Steinhauser; Peter H Stone
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2007-12

6.  [Results of aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis associated with severe left ventricular dysfunction].

Authors:  Abderrahmane Bakkali; Imad Jaabari; Claude Koulekey Dadji; Rochde Sayah; Mohamed Laaroussi
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2018-01-26

Review 7.  Aortic Stenosis, a Left Ventricular Disease: Insights from Advanced Imaging.

Authors:  Sveeta Badiani; Jet van Zalen; Thomas A Treibel; Sanjeev Bhattacharyya; James C Moon; Guy Lloyd
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.931

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.