Literature DB >> 2254437

Reproducibility of API Staph-Ident system identifications of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from blood.

T L Overman1, J K Overley.   

Abstract

Fifty-five isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci from blood were identified four times each by using the API Staph-Ident (API-SI) system to determine the identification reproducibility of the system. Identifications were determined by using both Version 1 and Version 2 of the API-SI Profile Index. The 75 to 100% reproducibility levels, including reproducible nonidentifications, were 98.2% for Version 1 and 96.4% for Version 2. Version 1 gave an identification for 92.5% of the isolates with a 75 to 100% reproducibility, while Version 2 gave an identification for 100% of the isolates with a 75 to 100% reproducibility. The reproducibility of the API-SI identifications of coagulase-negative staphylococci from blood was good.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2254437      PMCID: PMC268233          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.28.11.2585-2586.1990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  11 in total

1.  Species identification and biotyping of staphylococci by the API staph-ident system.

Authors:  G V Doern; J E Earls; P A Jeznach; D S Parker
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of the API Staph-Ident and DMS Staph-Trac systems with conventional methods used for the identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  O Giger; C C Charilaou; K R Cundy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Species of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from catheter tips from open-heart surgery patients.

Authors:  R Freeman; N Hjersing
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  C M Sewell; J E Clarridge; E J Young; R K Guthrie
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococcal isolates from blood cultures.

Authors:  R H Eng; C Wang; A Person; T E Kiehn; D Armstrong
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of the MicroScan system with the API Staph-Ident system for species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  Z Hussain; L Stoakes; D L Stevens; B C Schieven; R Lannigan; C Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Clinical comparison of the AutoMicrobic system gram-positive identification card, API Staph-Ident, and conventional methods in the identification of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp.

Authors:  A E Grasmick; N Naito; D A Bruckner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Species identification and antibiotic susceptibilities of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from clinical specimens.

Authors:  V J Gill; S T Selepak; E C Williams
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci with the API STAPH-IDENT system.

Authors:  R J Almeida; J H Jorgensen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Identification of Staphylococcus species with the API STAPH-IDENT system.

Authors:  W E Kloos; J F Wolfshohl
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Use of enzyme tests in characterization and identification of aerobic and facultatively anaerobic gram-positive cocci.

Authors:  S Bascomb; M Manafi
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  A simple and inexpensive method for the identification of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus hominis.

Authors:  J G Mulder
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Accuracies of Leuconostoc phenotypic identification: a comparison of API systems and conventional phenotypic assays.

Authors:  Wanla Kulwichit; Sumanee Nilgate; Tanittha Chatsuwan; Sunisa Krajiw; Chudaachhara Unhasuta; Anan Chongthaleong
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 3.090

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.