Literature DB >> 22544369

Genetic counseling for personal genomic testing: optimizing client uptake of post-test telephonic counseling services.

Elissa Levin1, Sara Riordan, Jana Klein, Shannon Kieran.   

Abstract

The field of genetic counseling faces a broad challenge: many potential clients may not be aware of the value and benefit of genetic counseling services, and therefore may not utilize those services. Navigenics is a personal genomic testing company that provides telephonic genetic counseling services for multifactorial diseases and pharmacogenetics. When first offered in 2008, utilization of the Navigenics genetic counseling service was less than expected. To explore the basis for under-utilization and potential mechanisms for increasing uptake, Navigenics initiated a quality improvement study, in which three different methods of engaging clients in the uptake of genetic counseling services were assessed over the course of 1 year. Outcomes showed significant differences in uptake rates between methodologies (7.5%, 24.6%, and 60.1%), yielding an 8-fold increase in service utilization when post-test telephonic outreach to all clients was performed. Further, utilization spanned all risk levels based on client results, evidence that not only clients with high-risk results were motivated to engage in the genetic counseling service. This research indicates that implementing strategies to educate clients about genetic counseling can positively impact client engagement and utilization of available services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22544369     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-012-9496-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  11 in total

1.  Systematic follow-up and case management of the abnormal newborn screen can improve acceptance of genetic counseling for sickle cell or other hemoglobinopathy trait.

Authors:  Beth Kladny; Elizabeth A Gettig; Lakshmanan Krishnamurti
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 8.822

2.  Referral to cancer genetic counseling: are there stages of readiness?

Authors:  Suzanne M O'Neill; June A Peters; Victor G Vogel; Eleanor Feingold; Wendy S Rubinstein
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.908

3.  Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk.

Authors:  Cinnamon S Bloss; Nicholas J Schork; Eric J Topol
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Use of record linkage between a statewide genetics service and a Birth Defects/Congenital Malformations Register to determine use of genetic counselling services.

Authors:  J Halliday; O Griffin; A Bankier; C Rose; M Riley
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1997-10-03

5.  Attitudes toward colon cancer gene testing: factors predicting test uptake.

Authors:  A M Codori; G M Petersen; D L Miglioretti; E K Larkin; M T Bushey; C Young; J D Brensinger; K Johnson; J A Bacon; S V Booker
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Genetic testing in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer.

Authors:  C Lerman; C Hughes; B J Trock; R E Myers; D Main; A Bonney; M R Abbaszadegan; A E Harty; B A Franklin; J F Lynch; H T Lynch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Factors influencing patients' decisions to decline cancer genetic counseling services.

Authors:  K P Geer; M E Ropka; W F Cohn; S M Jones; S Miesfeldt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Comparison of couples referred and not referred for genetic counseling in a genetic clinic after the birth of a child with a congenital anomaly: a study in a population in the northeastern Netherlands.

Authors:  M C Cornel; A J van Essen; L P ten Kate
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1992-02-01

9.  Uptake of genetic counselling and predictive DNA testing in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Imke Christiaans; Erwin Birnie; Gouke J Bonsel; Arthur Am Wilde; Irene M van Langen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  The role of financial factors in acceptance of clinical BRCA genetic testing.

Authors:  Shannon Kieran; Lois J Loescher; Kyung Hee Lim
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2007
View more
  5 in total

1.  Genomic counseling: next generation counseling.

Authors:  Rachel Mills; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Ancestry Testing and the Practice of Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Brianne E Kirkpatrick; Misha D Rashkin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Randomized noninferiority trial of telephone versus in-person genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Beth N Peshkin; Jeanne Mandelblatt; Rachel Nusbaum; An-Tsun Huang; Yaojen Chang; Kristi Graves; Claudine Isaacs; Marie Wood; Wendy McKinnon; Judy Garber; Shelley McCormick; Anita Y Kinney; George Luta; Sarah Kelleher; Kara-Grace Leventhal; Patti Vegella; Angie Tong; Lesley King
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Personalized genomic results: analysis of informational needs.

Authors:  Tara J Schmidlen; Lisa Wawak; Rachel Kasper; J Felipe García-España; Michael F Christman; Erynn S Gordon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Genetic tests obtainable through pharmacies: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

Authors:  George P Patrinos; Darrol J Baker; Fahd Al-Mulla; Vasilis Vasiliou; David N Cooper
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 4.639

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.