Literature DB >> 2254379

Comparative carcinogenicity of cigarette mainstream and sidestream smoke condensates on the mouse skin.

E Mohtashamipur1, A Mohtashamipur, P G Germann, H Ernst, K Norpoth, U Mohr.   

Abstract

The direct carcinogenic effects of sidestream (SS) and mainstream (MS) smoke condensates of a filtered commercial brand of blond cigarettes were compared using a lifetime mouse skin tumorigenicity assay on female NMRI mice. Each cigarette was smoked by a smoking machine under the standard conditions, and the separately collected SS and MS smoke condensates were extracted with acetone/methanol as described elsewhere. These were tested for carcinogenicity on an area of 1-1.5 cm shaved skin of mice on the lower back. The mice were treated with half of each dose (5, 10 or 15 mg) twice a week, for only 3 months. No substance was used as promoter or as an additional initiator of carcinogenicity. No statistically significant difference was found when the life spans of MS-treated and untreated animals were compared. In contrast, the life spans of SS-treated mice were significantly (P less than 0.01) shorter than those of MS-treated animals or those of all three negative control groups together. The observed carcinogenic effects were based on tumours and lesions found only on the site of application of the test material. Of 210 mice (effective number, 129) serving as the negative controls, 3 developed skin lesions but no tumours. Of 210 MS-treated mice (effective number, 177), 7 developed tumours (4 malignant and 3 benign) and 35 had a uniform type of precancerous skin lesions. The numbers of tumours or lesions were not increased dose-dependently. Of 210 SS-treated animals (effective number, 182), 30 developed tumours (16 malignant and 14 benign) and 56 had a uniform type of precancerous skin lesion. The initiation of these latter lesions was found to be dose-dependent (P less than 0.001). The SS-treated animals developed two to six times more skin tumours than the MS-treated mice. Comparing the negative controls with the MS- or SS-treated animals, the overall carcinogenic effect observed was statistically significant. Comparing the MS- with SS-treated animals, the overall carcinogenic effect of SS was much higher than that of MS (P less than 0.001).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2254379     DOI: 10.1007/bf01637081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  26 in total

1.  A study of tobacco carcinogenesis. VII. The role of higher polycyclic hydrocarbons.

Authors:  E L WYNDER; D HOFFMANN
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1959 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Comparative bone marrow clastogenicity of cigarette sidestream, mainstream and recombined smoke condensates in mice.

Authors:  E Mohtashamipur; T Steinforth; K Norpoth
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 3.  Experimental tobacco carcinogenesis.

Authors:  E L Wynder; D Hoffmann
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-11-22       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Investigations on the effects of chronic cigarette-smoke inhalation in Syrian golden hamsters.

Authors:  W Dontenwill; H J Chevalier; H P Harke; U Lafrenz; G Reckzeh; B Schneider
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  A study of tobacco carcinogenesis. XI. Tumor initiators, tumor accelerators, and tumor promoting activity of condensate fractions.

Authors:  D Hoffmann; E L Wynder
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  [Passive smoking: measuring of concentrations of polycylic aromatic hydorcarbons in rooms after machine smoking of cigarettes (author's transl)].

Authors:  G Grimmer; H Böhnke; H P Harke
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1977-11-09       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Cigarette smoke inhalation studies in inbred Syrian golden hamsters.

Authors:  P Bernfeld; F Homburger; E Soto; K J Pai
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Spontaneous tumors in NMRI mice from carcinogenicity studies.

Authors:  E Bomhard; U Mohr
Journal:  Exp Pathol       Date:  1989

9.  On the efficiency of age-adjusted tests in animal carcinogenicity experiments.

Authors:  J J Gart; R E Tarone
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Carcinogenic action of cigarette smoke condensate on mouse skin.

Authors:  T D Day
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Second-hand smoke and human lung cancer.

Authors:  Ahmad Besaratinia; Gerd P Pfeifer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 2.  Philip Morris toxicological experiments with fresh sidestream smoke: more toxic than mainstream smoke.

Authors:  S Schick; S Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Association between secondhand smoke and cancers in adults in the US population.

Authors:  Zhongmian Zhang; Zhipeng Li; Xiyan Zhang; Wangyu Ye; JiaQin Chen; Lan Wang; Zili Lin; Jian Li; Zhihong Li
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 4.322

Review 4.  DNA damage, DNA repair and carcinogenicity: Tobacco smoke versus electronic cigarette aerosol.

Authors:  Moon-Shong Tang; Hyun-Wook Lee; Mao-Wen Weng; Hsiang-Tsui Wang; Yu Hu; Lung-Chi Chen; Sung-Hyun Park; Huei-Wei Chan; Jiheng Xu; Xue-Ru Wu; He Wang; Rui Yang; Karen Galdane; Kathryn Jackson; Annie Chu; Elizabeth Halzack
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 7.015

5.  Indoor air pollution and risk of lung cancer among Chinese female non-smokers.

Authors:  Lina Mu; Li Liu; Rungui Niu; Baoxing Zhao; Jianping Shi; Yanli Li; Mya Swanson; William Scheider; Jia Su; Shen-Chih Chang; Shunzhang Yu; Zuo-Feng Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Assessment of "gene-environment" interaction in cases of familial and sporadic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Theresa P Yeo; Ralph H Hruban; Jonathan Brody; Kieran Brune; Sheila Fitzgerald; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions in the lung, liver and urinary tract of mice exposed to environmental cigarette smoke and UV light since birth.

Authors:  Francesco D'Agostini; Roumen Balansky; Vernon E Steele; Gancho Ganchev; Carlo Pesce; Silvio De Flora
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Environmental tobacco smoke is just as damaging to DNA as mainstream smoke.

Authors:  E Bermúdez; K Stone; K M Carter; W A Pryor
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Household ventilation may reduce effects of indoor air pollutants for prevention of lung cancer: a case-control study in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Zi-Yi Jin; Ming Wu; Ren-Qiang Han; Xiao-Feng Zhang; Xu-Shan Wang; Ai-Ming Liu; Jin-Yi Zhou; Qing-Yi Lu; Claire H Kim; Lina Mu; Zuo-Feng Zhang; Jin-Kou Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Secondhand Smoking and the Risk of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a High Incidence Region, Kashmir, India: A Case-control-observational Study.

Authors:  Rumaisa Rafiq; Idrees Ayoub Shah; Gulzar Ahmad Bhat; Mohd Maqbool Lone; Farhad Islami; Paolo Boffetta; Nazir Ahmad Dar
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.