Literature DB >> 16319363

Philip Morris toxicological experiments with fresh sidestream smoke: more toxic than mainstream smoke.

S Schick1, S Glantz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Exposure to secondhand smoke causes lung cancer; however, there are little data in the open literature on the in vivo toxicology of fresh sidestream cigarette smoke to guide the debate about smoke-free workplaces and public places.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the unpublished in vivo research on sidestream cigarette smoke done by Philip Morris Tobacco Company during the 1980s at its Institut für Biologische Forschung (INBIFO).
METHODS: Analysis of internal tobacco industry documents now available at the University of California San Francisco Legacy Tobacco Documents Library and other websites.
RESULTS: Inhaled fresh sidestream cigarette smoke is approximately four times more toxic per gram total particulate matter (TPM) than mainstream cigarette smoke. Sidestream condensate is approximately three times more toxic per gram and two to six times more tumourigenic per gram than mainstream condensate by dermal application. The gas/vapour phase of sidestream smoke is responsible for most of the sensory irritation and respiratory tract epithelium damage. Fresh sidestream smoke inhibits normal weight gain in developing animals. In a 21 day exposure, fresh sidestream smoke can cause damage to the respiratory epithelium at concentrations of 2 microg/l TPM. Damage to the respiratory epithelium increases with longer exposures. The toxicity of whole sidestream smoke is higher than the sum of the toxicities of its major constituents.
CONCLUSION: Fresh sidestream smoke at concentrations commonly encountered indoors is well above a 2 microg/m3 reference concentration (the level at which acute effects are unlikely to occur), calculated from the results of the INBIFO studies, that defines acute toxicity to humans. Smoke-free public places and workplaces are the only practical way to protect the public health from the toxins in sidestream smoke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16319363      PMCID: PMC1748121          DOI: 10.1136/tc.2005.011288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  22 in total

Review 1.  Tobacco industry manipulation of research.

Authors:  Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  A study on the mutagenicity of tobacco smoke from low-tar cigarettes.

Authors:  O T Chortyk; W J Chamberlain
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug

3.  Comparative bone marrow clastogenicity of cigarette sidestream, mainstream and recombined smoke condensates in mice.

Authors:  E Mohtashamipur; T Steinforth; K Norpoth
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Uptake of sidestream smoke by Syrian golden hamsters.

Authors:  N J Haley; J D Adams; J Alzofon; D Hoffmann
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.372

5.  Sensory irritation of the upper airways by airborne chemicals.

Authors:  Y Alarie
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Mutagenic determination of passive smoking.

Authors:  P I Ling; G Löfroth; J Lewtas
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.372

7.  Publication bias and public health policy on environmental tobacco smoke.

Authors:  L A Bero; S A Glantz; D Rennie
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-07-13       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Comparative carcinogenicity of cigarette mainstream and sidestream smoke condensates on the mouse skin.

Authors:  E Mohtashamipur; A Mohtashamipur; P G Germann; H Ernst; K Norpoth; U Mohr
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Environmental tobacco smoke: comparative characterization by mutagenicity assays of sidestream and mainstream cigarette smoke.

Authors:  G Löfroth; G Lazaridis
Journal:  Environ Mutagen       Date:  1986

Review 10.  Application of toxicological risk assessment principles to the chemical constituents of cigarette smoke.

Authors:  J Fowles; E Dybing
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  85 in total

1.  Sidestream cigarette smoke toxicity increases with aging and exposure duration.

Authors:  Suzaynn F Schick; Suzaynn Schick; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Secondhand smoke exposure and osteoporosis in never-smoking postmenopausal women: the Fourth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  K H Kim; C M Lee; S M Park; B Cho; Y Chang; S G Park; K Lee
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  The future of smoke-free legislation.

Authors:  Simon Chapman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-09-09

Review 4.  Legal risks to employers who allow smoking in the workplace.

Authors:  Leslie Zellers; Meliah A Thomas; Marice Ashe
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Molecular processes that drive cigarette smoke-induced epithelial cell fate of the lung.

Authors:  Toru Nyunoya; Yohannes Mebratu; Amelia Contreras; Monica Delgado; Hitendra S Chand; Yohannes Tesfaigzi
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.914

6.  Cigarette smoking, passive smoking, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma risk: evidence from the California Teachers Study.

Authors:  Yani Lu; Sophia S Wang; Peggy Reynolds; Ellen T Chang; Huiyan Ma; Jane Sullivan-Halley; Christina A Clarke; Leslie Bernstein
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  The effect of cigarette smoke exposure on developing folate binding protein-2 null mice.

Authors:  Kristin H Horn; Emily R Esposito; Robert M Greene; M Michele Pisano
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 3.143

8.  Prenatal exposure to environmental tobacco smoke alters gene expression in the developing murine hippocampus.

Authors:  Partha Mukhopadhyay; Kristin H Horn; Robert M Greene; M Michele Pisano
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 9.  Hookah (Shisha, Narghile) Smoking and Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS). A critical review of the relevant literature and the public health consequences.

Authors:  Kamal Chaouachi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Failure of hospital employees to comply with smoke-free policy is associated with nicotine dependence and motives for smoking: a descriptive cross-sectional study at a teaching hospital in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Tom Parks; Clare Vr Wilson; Kenrick Turner; Joel We Chin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.