Literature DB >> 22543546

Does neuromuscular blockade affect the assessment of pelvic organ prolapse?

Hema D Brazell1, C Sage Claydon, Janet Li, Carol Moore, Nina Dereska, Suzanne Hudson, Steven Swift.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to determine if anesthesia with neuromuscular blockade alters the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) examination.
METHODS: A prospective, multi-center trial was conducted of women undergoing pelvic surgery. A POP-Q examination performed pre-operatively was compared with an examination performed intra-operatively under neuromuscular blockade. For the latter examination, an Allis clamp was used to apply gentle traction until the point being examined did not undergo further descent. International Continence Society (ICS) stages and individual POP-Q points were compared using a paired sample t test. A sample size of 32 provided 80% power to detect a clinically significant difference between office and operating room measurements (Sample Power, SPSS, 1997).
RESULTS: Of 153 women, 76% received general endotracheal anesthesia and 21% laryngeal mask airway. With an increase of 3 cm, the apical compartment was significantly more prolapsed in the operating room (OR; p < 0.05); however, a comparison of the mean values demonstrated a larger change in means for all points except total vaginal length. When separated into anterior, apical, and posterior compartments, the ICS stages were systematically different in the OR than in the office for all stages (p < 0.0005).
CONCLUSIONS: Neuromuscular blockade leads to significantly greater increases in POP-Q examination measurements compared with the office measurements, and this increase is most pronounced apically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22543546     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1771-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  6 in total

1.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiological study.

Authors:  R E Allen; G L Hosker; A R Smith; D W Warrell
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1990-09

3.  A comparison of preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of patients undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System.

Authors:  Mark E Vierhout; Jackie Stoutjesdijk; Johan Spruijt
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-07-29

4.  Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A L Olsen; V J Smith; J O Bergstrom; J C Colling; A L Clark
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  The role of partial denervation of the pelvic floor in the aetiology of genitourinary prolapse and stress incontinence of urine. A neurophysiological study.

Authors:  A R Smith; G L Hosker; D W Warrell
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1989-01

6.  A comparison of preoperative and intraoperative evaluations for patients who undergo site-specific operation for the correction of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  David D Vineyard; Thomas J Kuehl; Kimberly W Coates; Bobby L Shull
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 8.661

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  To pull or not to pull, that is the question…how should we define prolapse?

Authors:  Phillip Smith; Steven Swift; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Does traction on the cervix under anaesthesia tell us when to perform a concomitant hysterectomy? A 2-year follow-up of a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chendrimada Madhu; Richard Foon; Wael Agur; Phillip Smith
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Relationship of degree of uterine prolapse between pelvic examination in lithotomy position with cervical traction and pelvic examination in standing position.

Authors:  Pichai Leerasiri; Parit Wachasiddhisilpa; Pattaya Hengrasmee; Chutimon Asumpinwong
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Apical descent in the office and the operating room: the effect of prolapse size.

Authors:  Erin C Crosby; Kristen M Sharp; Adrian Gasperut; John O L Delancey; Daniel M Morgan
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.091

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.