Literature DB >> 12066090

A comparison of preoperative and intraoperative evaluations for patients who undergo site-specific operation for the correction of pelvic organ prolapse.

David D Vineyard1, Thomas J Kuehl, Kimberly W Coates, Bobby L Shull.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We compared preoperative and intraoperative assessments of pelvic organ prolapse to ascertain whether differences existed. STUDY
DESIGN: This study is a retrospective analysis of information that was collected of 193 women who underwent reconstructive operation for pelvic organ prolapse between January 1994 and April 1999 by the senior author (B. L. S.) in this institution. Support for the urethra, bladder, cervix or vaginal cuff, cul-de-sac, and rectum were assessed with the Baden-Walker halfway system before and during the operations.
RESULTS: Preoperative and intraoperative assessments were significantly correlated (Spearman rank order correlation, 0.85-0.94). A comparison of the assessments revealed significantly greater prolapse at the urethra, cervix/cuff, cul-de-sac, and rectum on intraoperative evaluation (P <or=.00007).
CONCLUSION: Intraoperative evaluation of women who are to undergo reconstructive operation for pelvic organ prolapse may reveal greater prolapse at selected sites than previously noted in up to 32% of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12066090     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.122985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  11 in total

1.  Does neuromuscular blockade affect the assessment of pelvic organ prolapse?

Authors:  Hema D Brazell; C Sage Claydon; Janet Li; Carol Moore; Nina Dereska; Suzanne Hudson; Steven Swift
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Does pre-operative traction on the cervix approximate intra-operative uterine prolapse? A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Fay L Chao; Anna Rosamilia; Peter L Dwyer; Alex Polyakov; Lore Schierlitz; Gerard Agnew
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Relationship of degree of uterine prolapse between pelvic examination in lithotomy position with cervical traction and pelvic examination in standing position.

Authors:  Pichai Leerasiri; Parit Wachasiddhisilpa; Pattaya Hengrasmee; Chutimon Asumpinwong
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  A novel technique to measure in vivo uterine suspensory ligament stiffness.

Authors:  Tovia Martirosian Smith; Jiajia Luo; Yvonne Hsu; James Ashton-Miller; John Oliver Delancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  A comparison of preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of patients undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System.

Authors:  Mark E Vierhout; Jackie Stoutjesdijk; Johan Spruijt
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-07-29

6.  Assessment of a semiautomated pelvic floor measurement model for evaluating pelvic organ prolapse on MRI.

Authors:  S Onal; S Lai-Yuen; P Bao; A Weitzenfeld; K Greene; R Kedar; S Hart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Intraoperative cervix location and apical support stiffness in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Carolyn W Swenson; Tovia M Smith; Jiajia Luo; Giselle E Kolenic; James A Ashton-Miller; John O DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  How accurate is symptomatic and clinical evaluation of prolapse prior to surgical repair?

Authors:  Abdalla Fayyad; Simon Hill; Vinita Gurung; Sanjeev Prashar; Anthony R B Smith
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-02-15

9.  Apical descent in the office and the operating room: the effect of prolapse size.

Authors:  Erin C Crosby; Kristen M Sharp; Adrian Gasperut; John O L Delancey; Daniel M Morgan
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.091

Review 10.  Mechanics of Uterosacral Ligaments: Current Knowledge, Existing Gaps, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Kandace Donaldson; Alyssa Huntington; Raffaella De Vita
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.