Literature DB >> 22542258

Ultrasonography for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.

Ta-Wei Tai1, Cheng-Yi Wu, Fong-Chin Su, Tai-Chang Chern, I-Ming Jou.   

Abstract

Ultrasonography is widely used to diagnose carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), a common peripheral neuropathy, but the reported diagnostic accuracy varies. This meta-analysis focused on the diagnostic test accuracy of ultrasonography for diagnosing CTS. Structured searches of PubMed for 1990-2010 were done and the data were extracted and meta-analyzed by pooling estimates of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratios. Diagnostic performance was also judged by using a summary receiver operating characteristic curve. Twenty-eight trials involving 3995 wrists were included. A greater cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel inlet (CSA-I) and a greater flattening ratio at the level of the hamate were seen in CTS wrists than in control wrists. A CSA-I ≥9 mm(2) is the best single diagnostic criterion, with a diagnostic odds ratio of 40.4 (sensitivity 87.3%, specificity 83.3%). Crown
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22542258     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.02.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  32 in total

1.  Elongated muscle belly of the flexor digitorum superficial causing carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Antonios Kerasnoudis
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2012-09

Review 2.  Grey-scale sonography and sonoelastography for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Hideaki Miyamoto; Yutaka Morizaki; Takahiro Kashiyama; Sakae Tanaka
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-28

3.  Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Treatment and the Subsequent Alterations in Median Nerve Transverse Mobility.

Authors:  Mohammad Hosseini-Farid; Verena J M M Schrier; Julia Starlinger; Peter C Amadio
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Median Nerve Transverse Mobility and Outcome after Carpal Tunnel Release.

Authors:  Verena J M M Schrier; Stefanie Evers; Jennifer R Geske; Walter K Kremers; Hector R Villarraga; Sanjeev Kakar; Ruud W Selles; Steven E R Hovius; Russell Gelfman; Peter C Amadio
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Prospective Pilot Study Comparing Pre- and Postsurgical CTSAQ and Neuro-QoL Questionnaire with Median Nerve High-Resolution Ultrasound Cross-Sectional Areas.

Authors:  Tuan A Tran; Lisa M Williams; Donna Bui; Colleen Anthonisen; Eduard Poltavskiy; Robert M Szabo
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  Carpal tunnel syndrome severity staging using sonographic and clinical measures.

Authors:  Shawn C Roll; Kevin R Volz; Christine M Fahy; Kevin D Evans
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.217

7.  Reliability Assessment of Various Sonographic Techniques for Evaluating Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Authors:  Anthony D Junck; Eva M Escobedo; Bethany M Lipa; Michael Cronan; Colleen Anthonisen; Eduard Poltavskiy; Heejung Bang; Jay J Han
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Is distal motor and/or sensory demyelination a distinctive feature of anti-MAG neuropathy?

Authors:  Pierre Lozeron; Vincent Ribrag; David Adams; Marion Brisset; Marguerite Vignon; Marine Baron; Marion Malphettes; Marie Theaudin; Bertrand Arnulf; Nathalie Kubis
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Estimating the most accurate sonographic measurement in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: Which is the best?

Authors:  Özlem Köroğlu; Serdar Kesikburun; Emre Adıgüzel; Mehmet Ali Taşkaynatan; Ahmet Özgül
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-04-30

Review 10.  [Diagnostic nerve ultrasonography].

Authors:  T Bäumer; A Grimm; T Schelle
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.