T Bäumer1, A Grimm2, T Schelle3. 1. Institut für Neurogenetik, Universität zu Lübeck (CBBM; Haus 66), Marie-Curie-Straße, 23562, Lübeck, Deutschland. tobias.baeumer@neuro.uni-luebeck.de. 2. Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland. 3. Neurologische Klinik, Städtisches Klinikum Dessau, Dessau, Deutschland.
Abstract
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: For the diagnostics of nerve lesions an imaging method is necessary to visualize peripheral nerves and their surrounding structures for an etiological classification. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: Clinical neurological and electrophysiological investigations provide functional information about nerve lesions. The information provided by a standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination is inadequate for peripheral nerve diagnostics; however, MRI neurography is suitable but on the other hand a resource and time-consuming method. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Using ultrasonography for peripheral nerve diagnostics. PERFORMANCE: With ultrasonography reliable diagnostics of entrapment neuropathies and traumatic nerve lesions are possible. The use of ultrasonography for neuropathies shows that a differentiation between different forms is possible. ACHIEVEMENTS: Nerve ultrasonography is an established diagnostic tool. In addition to the clinical examination and clinical electrophysiology, structural information can be obtained, which results in a clear improvement in the diagnostics. Ultrasonography has become an integral part of the diagnostic work-up of peripheral nerve lesions in neurophysiological departments. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Nerve ultrasonography is recommended for the diagnostic work-up of peripheral nerve lesions in addition to clinical and electrophysiological investigations. It should be used in the clinical work-up of entrapment neuropathies, traumatic nerve lesions and spacy-occupying lesions of nerves.
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: For the diagnostics of nerve lesions an imaging method is necessary to visualize peripheral nerves and their surrounding structures for an etiological classification. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: Clinical neurological and electrophysiological investigations provide functional information about nerve lesions. The information provided by a standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination is inadequate for peripheral nerve diagnostics; however, MRI neurography is suitable but on the other hand a resource and time-consuming method. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Using ultrasonography for peripheral nerve diagnostics. PERFORMANCE: With ultrasonography reliable diagnostics of entrapment neuropathies and traumatic nerve lesions are possible. The use of ultrasonography for neuropathies shows that a differentiation between different forms is possible. ACHIEVEMENTS: Nerve ultrasonography is an established diagnostic tool. In addition to the clinical examination and clinical electrophysiology, structural information can be obtained, which results in a clear improvement in the diagnostics. Ultrasonography has become an integral part of the diagnostic work-up of peripheral nerve lesions in neurophysiological departments. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Nerve ultrasonography is recommended for the diagnostic work-up of peripheral nerve lesions in addition to clinical and electrophysiological investigations. It should be used in the clinical work-up of entrapment neuropathies, traumatic nerve lesions and spacy-occupying lesions of nerves.
Entities:
Keywords:
Electrophysiology; Imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Peripheral nerves; Ultrasonography
Authors: Alexander Grimm; Maria Rasenack; Ioanna M Athanasopoulou; Nele Maria Dammeier; Christina Lipski; Stefan Wolking; Debora Vittore; Bernhard F Décard; Hubertus Axer Journal: J Neurol Date: 2015-11-11 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Nurcan Üçeyler; Kristina A Schäfer; Daniel Mackenrodt; Claudia Sommer; Wolfgang Müllges Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2016-03-30 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Kamal Mezian; Jakub Jačisko; Radek Kaiser; Stanislav Machač; Petra Steyerová; Karolína Sobotová; Yvona Angerová; Ondřej Naňka Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 4.003