Literature DB >> 22542239

Linear and nonlinear modeling approaches for urban air quality prediction.

Kunwar P Singh1, Shikha Gupta, Atulesh Kumar, Sheo Prasad Shukla.   

Abstract

In this study, linear and nonlinear modeling was performed to predict the urban air quality of the Lucknow city (India). Partial least squares regression (PLSR), multivariate polynomial regression (MPR), and artificial neural network (ANN) approach-based models were constructed to predict the respirable suspended particulate matter (RSPM), SO(2), and NO(2) in the air using the meteorological (air temperature, relative humidity, wind speed) and air quality monitoring data (SPM, NO(2), SO(2)) of five years (2005-2009). Three different ANN models, viz. multilayer perceptron network (MLPN), radial-basis function network (RBFN), and generalized regression neural network (GRNN) were developed. All the five different models were compared for their generalization and prediction abilities using statistical criteria parameters, viz. correlation coefficient (R), standard error of prediction (SEP), mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), bias, accuracy factor (A(f)), and Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient of efficiency (E(f)). Nonlinear models (MPR, ANNs) performed relatively better than the linear PLSR models, whereas, performance of the ANN models was better than the low-order nonlinear MPR models. Although, performance of all the three ANN models were comparable, the GRNN over performed the other two variants. The optimal GRNN models for RSPM, NO(2), and SO(2) yielded high correlation (between measured and model predicted values) of 0.933, 0.893, and 0.885; 0.833, 0.602, and 0.596; and 0.932, 0.768 and 0.729, respectively for the training, validation and test sets. The sensitivity analysis performed to evaluate the importance of the input variables in optimal GRNN revealed that SO(2) was the most influencing parameter in RSPM model, whereas, SPM was the most important input variable in other two models. The ANN models may be useful tools in the air quality predictions.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22542239     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  7 in total

1.  Estimation of NMVOC emissions using artificial neural networks and economical and sustainability indicators as inputs.

Authors:  Lidija J Stamenković; Davor Z Antanasijević; Mirjana Đ Ristić; Aleksandra A Perić-Grujić; Viktor V Pocajt
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Predicting dissolved oxygen concentration using kernel regression modeling approaches with nonlinear hydro-chemical data.

Authors:  Kunwar P Singh; Shikha Gupta; Premanjali Rai
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Nonlinear QSAR modeling for predicting cytotoxicity of ionic liquids in leukemia rat cell line: an aid to green chemicals designing.

Authors:  Shikha Gupta; Nikita Basant; Kunwar P Singh
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Modeling the binding affinity of structurally diverse industrial chemicals to carbon using the artificial intelligence approaches.

Authors:  Shikha Gupta; Nikita Basant; Premanjali Rai; Kunwar P Singh
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Modeling of policies for reduction of GHG emissions in energy sector using ANN: case study-Croatia (EU).

Authors:  Tomislav Bolanča; Tomislav Strahovnik; Šime Ukić; Mirjana Novak Stankov; Marko Rogošić
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Predicting adsorptive removal of chlorophenol from aqueous solution using artificial intelligence based modeling approaches.

Authors:  Kunwar P Singh; Shikha Gupta; Priyanka Ojha; Premanjali Rai
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Modeling the concentrations of on-road air pollutants in southern California.

Authors:  Lianfa Li; Jun Wu; Neelakshi Hudda; Constantinos Sioutas; Scott A Fruin; Ralph J Delfino
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 9.028

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.