Literature DB >> 22542215

Training Zambian traditional birth attendants to reduce neonatal mortality in the Lufwanyama Neonatal Survival Project (LUNESP).

Christopher J Gill1, Nicholas G Guerina, Charity Mulenga, Anna B Knapp, Grace Mazala, Davidson H Hamer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide relevant details on how interventions in the Lufwanyama Neonatal Survival Project (LUNESP) were developed and how Zambian traditional birth attendants (TBAs) were trained to perform them.
METHODS: The study tested 2 interventions: a simplified version of the American Academy of Pediatrics' neonatal resuscitation protocol (NRP); and antibiotics with facilitated referral (AFR).
RESULTS: Key elements that enabled the positive study result were: focusing on common and correctible causes of mortality; selecting a study population with high unmet public health need; early community mobilization to build awareness and support; emphasizing simplicity in the intervention technology and algorithms; using a traditional training approach appropriate to students with low literacy rates; requiring TBAs to demonstrate their competence before completing each workshop; and minimizing attrition of skills by retraining and reassessing the TBAs regularly throughout the study.
CONCLUSION: An effective NRP training model was created that is suitable for community-based neonatal interventions, in research or programmatic settings, and by practitioners with limited obstetric skills and low rates of literacy. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00518856.
Copyright © 2012 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22542215      PMCID: PMC3366059          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  16 in total

1.  International Guidelines for Neonatal Resuscitation: An excerpt from the Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care: International Consensus on Science. Contributors and Reviewers for the Neonatal Resuscitation Guidelines.

Authors:  S Niermeyer; J Kattwinkel; P Van Reempts; V Nadkarni; B Phillips; D Zideman; D Azzopardi; R Berg; D Boyle; R Boyle; D Burchfield; W Carlo; L Chameides; S Denson; M Fallat; M Gerardi; A Gunn; M F Hazinski; W Keenan; S Knaebel; A Milner; J Perlman; O D Saugstad; C Schleien; A Solimano; M Speer; S Toce; T Wiswell; A Zaritsky
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Does traditional birth attendant training increase use of antenatal care? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  Lynn M Sibley; Theresa Ann Sipe; Marge Koblinsky
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.388

3.  What can a meta-analysis tell us about traditional birth attendant training and pregnancy outcomes?

Authors:  Lynn Sibley; Theresa Ann Sipe
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.372

4.  Effect on mortality of community-based maternity-care programme in rural Bangladesh.

Authors:  V Fauveau; K Stewart; S A Khan; J Chakraborty
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-11-09       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Cost-effectiveness of misoprostol to control postpartum hemorrhage in low-resource settings.

Authors:  S E K Bradley; N Prata; N Young-Lin; D M Bishai
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 3.561

Review 6.  Traditional birth attendant training for improving health behaviours and pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  L M Sibley; T A Sipe; C M Brown; M M Diallo; K McNatt; N Habarta
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-07-18

7.  Conclusions from the WHO multicenter study of serious infections in young infants. The WHO Young Infants Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  An intervention involving traditional birth attendants and perinatal and maternal mortality in Pakistan.

Authors:  Abdul Hakeem Jokhio; Heather R Winter; Kar Keung Cheng
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Clinical signs that predict severe illness in children under age 2 months: a multicentre study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Effect of training traditional birth attendants on neonatal mortality (Lufwanyama Neonatal Survival Project): randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Christopher J Gill; Grace Phiri-Mazala; Nicholas G Guerina; Joshua Kasimba; Charity Mulenga; William B MacLeod; Nelson Waitolo; Anna B Knapp; Mark Mirochnick; Arthur Mazimba; Matthew P Fox; Lora Sabin; Philip Seidenberg; Jonathon L Simon; Davidson H Hamer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-02-03
View more
  9 in total

1.  Community-based antibiotic delivery for possible serious bacterial infections in neonates in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Jessica Duby; Zohra S Lassi; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-11

2.  Stillbirths and neonatal mortality as outcomes.

Authors:  Robert L Goldenberg; Elizabeth M McClure; Alan H Jobe; Beena D Kamath-Rayne; Michael G Gravette; Craig E Rubens
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.561

Review 3.  Traditional birth attendants and birth outcomes in low-middle income countries: A review.

Authors:  Ana Garces; Elizabeth M McClure; Leopoldo Espinoza; Sarah Saleem; Lester Figueroa; Sherri Bucher; Robert L Goldenberg
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.300

Review 4.  Which intervention design factors influence performance of community health workers in low- and middle-income countries? A systematic review.

Authors:  Maryse C Kok; Marjolein Dieleman; Miriam Taegtmeyer; Jacqueline E W Broerse; Sumit S Kane; Hermen Ormel; Mandy M Tijm; Korrie A M de Koning
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.344

5.  Can traditional birth attendants be trained to accurately identify septic infants, initiate antibiotics, and refer in a rural African setting?

Authors:  Christopher John Gill; William B MacLeod; Grace Phiri-Mazala; Nicholas G Guerina; Mark Mirochnick; Anna B Knapp; Davidson H Hamer
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2014-08-31

6.  How does context influence performance of community health workers in low- and middle-income countries? Evidence from the literature.

Authors:  Maryse C Kok; Sumit S Kane; Olivia Tulloch; Hermen Ormel; Sally Theobald; Marjolein Dieleman; Miriam Taegtmeyer; Jacqueline E W Broerse; Korrie A M de Koning
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2015-03-07

7.  The mCME Project: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an SMS-Based Continuing Medical Education Intervention for Improving Medical Knowledge among Vietnamese Community Based Physicians' Assistants.

Authors:  Christopher J Gill; Bao Le Ngoc; Nafisa Halim; Ha Nguyen Viet; Anna Larson Williams; Tan Nguyen Van; Marion McNabb; Lien Tran Thi Ngoc; Ariel Falconer; Hai An Phan Ha; Julia Rohr; Hai Hoang; James Michiel; Tam Nguyen Thi Thanh; Liat Bird; Hoang Pham Vu; Mahlet Yeshitla; Nhu Ha Van; Lora Sabin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Validation of community health worker identification of maternal puerperal sepsis using a clinical diagnostic algorithm in Bangladesh and Pakistan.

Authors:  Amnesty E LeFevre; Fatima Mir; Dipak K Mitra; Shabina Ariff; Diwakar Mohan; Imran Ahmed; Shazia Sultana; Peter J Winch; Sadia Shakoor; Nicholas E Connor; Mohammad Shahidul Islam; Shams El-Arifeen; M A Quaiyum; Abdullah H Baqui; Michael G Gravett; Mathuram Santosham; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Anita Zaidi; Samir K Saha; Saifuddin Ahmed; Sajid Soofi; Linda A Bartlett
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 4.413

9.  Assessing regional variations in the effect of the removal of user fees on facility-based deliveries in rural Zambia.

Authors:  Chama-Chiliba Chitalu; Koch Steven
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.927

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.