Literature DB >> 22541143

Delayed primary closure versus primary closure for wound management in perforated appendicitis: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Ruey-An Chiang1, Shan-Long Chen, Yao-Chung Tsai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is still a matter of debate whether delayed primary closure (DPC) of contaminated abdominal incisions reduces surgical site infections compared with a primary closure (PC). The aim of this study was to determine the optimal method of wound closure for patients with perforated appendicitis.
METHODS: A total of 70 patients with perforated appendicitis were included. They were randomized to have their surgical incisions (skin and subcutaneous tissue) either PC or left open with Betadine-soaked gauze packing for DPC on the fifth postoperative day or later if the wound conditions were inappropriate for closure. A wound was considered infected if pus discharged from the incision site. The main outcome measures were the incidence of wound infection and the length of hospital stay (LOS).
RESULTS: In the entire series, wound infection developed after incision closure in 21.4% of the patients. The PC group had a higher incidence of wound infection (38.9% vs. 2.9%, p<0.001) and longer LOS (8.4 days vs. 6.3 days, p=0.038).
CONCLUSION: Delayed primary closure is the optimal management strategy for perforated appendicitis wounds. It significantly reduces the wound infection rate and length of stay.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22541143     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcma.2012.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chin Med Assoc        ISSN: 1726-4901            Impact factor:   2.743


  5 in total

1.  A randomized trial analyzing the effects of primary versus delayed primary closure of incision on wound healing in patients with hollow viscus perforation.

Authors:  Aditya Baksi; Shamita Chatterjee; Udipta Ray; Nilima Nilima; Washim Firoz Khan; Niladri Banerjee
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

2.  Primary versus delayed primary skin closure in operated patients due to perforated peptic ulcer disease: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Arash Mohammadi Tofigh; Shervan Family
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Efficacy of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Followed by Delayed Primary Closure for Abdominal Wounds in Patients with Lower Gastrointestinal Perforations: Multicenter Prospective Study.

Authors:  Hirofumi Ota; Katsuki Danno; Katsuya Ohta; Tae Matsumura; Takamichi Komori; Shu Okamura; Miho Okano; Atsuhiro Ogawa; Hiroshi Tamagawa; Mamoru Uemura; Chu Matsuda; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Hirofumi Yamamoto; Riichiro Nezu; Yuichiro Doki; Hidetoshi Eguchi
Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon       Date:  2020-07-30

Review 4.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of delayed primary wound closure in contaminated abdominal wounds.

Authors:  Boonying Siribumrungwong; Pinit Noorit; Chumpon Wilasrusmee; Ammarin Thakkinstian
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Primary versus delayed primary closure of laparotomy wounds in children following typhoid ileal perforation in Ile-Ife, Nigeria.

Authors:  Akan W Inyang; Usang E Usang; Ademola O Talabi; Lofty-John C Anyanwu; Oludayo A Sowande; Olusanya Adejuyigbe
Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.