Literature DB >> 22540174

What's a proper push? The Valsalva manoeuvre revisited.

Femke E M Mulder1, Ka L Shek, Hans P Dietz.   

Abstract

In daily practice, the Valsalva manoeuvre is used to assess pelvic organ prolapse, virtually always without standardisation of pressure. We undertook a study to determine maximum pressures reached and pressures required to obtain 80% of maximal pelvic organ descent, to investigate the need for such standardisation. Clinical data and ultrasound data sets of 75 women seen for urodynamic testing were reviewed retrospectively, with three Valsalva manoeuvres registered per patient. Maximum rectal pressures generated during Valsalva were 107 cm H (2) O on average (range, 45-190 cm H (2) O). Ninety-seven percent of all women managed to reach pressures ≥60 cm H (2) O. On average, 80% of maximal bladder neck descent was reached at 56 cm H (2) O, 80% of maximal pelvic organ descent at 38 cm H (2) O. Our results imply that virtually all patients were able to generate pressures resulting in ≥80% of maximal pelvic organ descent. This implies that standardisation of Valsalva pressures for prolapse assessment may be unnecessary.
© 2012 The Authors ANZJOG © 2012 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22540174     DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2012.01446.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  8 in total

1.  What is clinically relevant prolapse? An attempt at defining cutoffs for the clinical assessment of pelvic organ descent.

Authors:  H P Dietz; K P Mann
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Obesity: how much does it matter for female pelvic organ prolapse?

Authors:  Natharnia Young; Ixora Kamisan Atan; Rodrigo Guzman Rojas; Hans Peter Dietz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Clinical applications of pelvic floor imaging: opinion statement endorsed by the society of abdominal radiology (SAR), American Urological Association (AUA), and American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS).

Authors:  Victoria Chernyak; Joshua Bleier; Mariya Kobi; Ian Paquette; Milana Flusberg; Philippe Zimmern; Larissa V Rodriguez; Phyllis Glanc; Suzanne Palmer; Luz Maria Rodriguez; Marsha K Guess; Milena M Weinstein; Roopa Ram; Kedar Jambhekar; Gaurav Khatri
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-03-27

Review 4.  Translabial ultrasound in the assessment of pelvic floor and anorectal function in women with defecatory disorders.

Authors:  H P Dietz
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  What is normal bladder neck anatomy?

Authors:  Cristina Naranjo-Ortiz; Ka Lai Shek; Andrew James Martin; Hans Peter Dietz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Relative and Maximal Intra-abdominal Pressure and Postpartum Pelvic Floor Outcomes in Primiparas Delivered Vaginally.

Authors:  Janet M Shaw; Jing Zhou; Robert Hitchcock; Ingrid E Nygaard; Stefan Niederauer; Xiaoming Sheng
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.091

7.  An ultrasound observation study on the levator hiatus with or without diastasis recti abdominis in postpartum women.

Authors:  Peng Tian; Dong Mei Liu; Chao Wang; Yu Gu; Guo Qing Du; Jia Wei Tian
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Mean echogenicity and area of puborectalis muscle in women with stress urinary incontinence during pregnancy and after delivery.

Authors:  Maria K van de Waarsenburg; Mariëlla I J Withagen; Anique T M Grob; Karlijn J Schweitzer; Greetje A van Veelen; Carl H van der Vaart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 2.894

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.