Literature DB >> 22539825

Low error discrimination using a correlated population code.

Greg Schwartz1, Jakob Macke, Dario Amodei, Hanlin Tang, Michael J Berry.   

Abstract

We explored the manner in which spatial information is encoded by retinal ganglion cell populations. We flashed a set of 36 shape stimuli onto the tiger salamander retina and used different decoding algorithms to read out information from a population of 162 ganglion cells. We compared the discrimination performance of linear decoders, which ignore correlation induced by common stimulation, with nonlinear decoders, which can accurately model these correlations. Similar to previous studies, decoders that ignored correlation suffered only a modest drop in discrimination performance for groups of up to ∼30 cells. However, for more realistic groups of 100+ cells, we found order-of-magnitude differences in the error rate. We also compared decoders that used only the presence of a single spike from each cell with more complex decoders that included information from multiple spike counts and multiple time bins. More complex decoders substantially outperformed simpler decoders, showing the importance of spike timing information. Particularly effective was the first spike latency representation, which allowed zero discrimination errors for the majority of shape stimuli. Furthermore, the performance of nonlinear decoders showed even greater enhancement compared with linear decoders for these complex representations. Finally, decoders that approximated the correlation structure in the population by matching all pairwise correlations with a maximum entropy model fit to all 162 neurons were quite successful, especially for the spike latency representation. Together, these results suggest a picture in which linear decoders allow a coarse categorization of shape stimuli, whereas nonlinear decoders, which take advantage of both correlation and spike timing, are needed to achieve high-fidelity discrimination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22539825      PMCID: PMC3424080          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00564.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  49 in total

1.  Independent and redundant information in nearby cortical neurons.

Authors:  D S Reich; F Mechler; J D Victor
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-12-21       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Pyramidal neuron as two-layer neural network.

Authors:  Panayiota Poirazi; Terrence Brannon; Bartlett W Mel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 3.  Burst firing in sensory systems.

Authors:  Rüdiger Krahe; Fabrizio Gabbiani
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Decoding neuronal spike trains: how important are correlations?

Authors:  Sheila Nirenberg; Peter E Latham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Network information and connected correlations.

Authors:  Elad Schneidman; Susanne Still; Michael J Berry; William Bialek
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2003-12-02       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Computational subunits in thin dendrites of pyramidal cells.

Authors:  Alon Polsky; Bartlett W Mel; Jackie Schiller
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-05-23       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Recording spikes from a large fraction of the ganglion cells in a retinal patch.

Authors:  Ronen Segev; Joe Goodhouse; Jason Puchalla; Michael J Berry
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Reading a neural code.

Authors:  W Bialek; F Rieke; R R de Ruyter van Steveninck; D Warland
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-06-28       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Decoding neuronal population activity in rat somatosensory cortex: role of columnar organization.

Authors:  Stefano Panzeri; Filippo Petroni; Rasmus S Petersen; Mathew E Diamond
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Population coding of stimulus location in rat somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  R S Petersen; S Panzeri; M E Diamond
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  11 in total

1.  Rank Order Coding: a Retinal Information Decoding Strategy Revealed by Large-Scale Multielectrode Array Retinal Recordings.

Authors:  Geoffrey Portelli; John M Barrett; Gerrit Hilgen; Timothée Masquelier; Alessandro Maccione; Stefano Di Marco; Luca Berdondini; Pierre Kornprobst; Evelyne Sernagor
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-06-03

2.  High Accuracy Decoding of Dynamical Motion from a Large Retinal Population.

Authors:  Olivier Marre; Vicente Botella-Soler; Kristina D Simmons; Thierry Mora; Gašper Tkačik; Michael J Berry
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Functional MRI Representational Similarity Analysis Reveals a Dissociation between Discriminative and Relative Location Information in the Human Visual System.

Authors:  Zvi N Roth
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-30

4.  Coding Properties of Mouse Retinal Ganglion Cells with Dual-Peak Patterns with Respect to Stimulus Intervals.

Authors:  Ru-Jia Yan; Hai-Qing Gong; Pu-Ming Zhang; Pei-Ji Liang
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.380

5.  A pairwise maximum entropy model accurately describes resting-state human brain networks.

Authors:  Takamitsu Watanabe; Satoshi Hirose; Hiroyuki Wada; Yoshio Imai; Toru Machida; Ichiro Shirouzu; Seiki Konishi; Yasushi Miyashita; Naoki Masuda
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  A thesaurus for a neural population code.

Authors:  Elad Ganmor; Ronen Segev; Elad Schneidman
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  The structured 'low temperature' phase of the retinal population code.

Authors:  Mark L Ioffe; Michael J Berry
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Nonlinear decoding of a complex movie from the mammalian retina.

Authors:  Vicente Botella-Soler; Stéphane Deny; Georg Martius; Olivier Marre; Gašper Tkačik
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Signatures of criticality arise from random subsampling in simple population models.

Authors:  Marcel Nonnenmacher; Christian Behrens; Philipp Berens; Matthias Bethge; Jakob H Macke
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Ignoring correlated activity causes a failure of retinal population codes.

Authors:  Kiersten Ruda; Joel Zylberberg; Greg D Field
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.