Literature DB >> 22538393

A single, global patient-centered measure from the SF-36 instrument to assess surgical outcomes and quality of life: a pilot study.

Vic Velanovich1, Jason Younga, Varun Bhandarkar, Nathan Marshall, Patrick McLaren, Jennifer Ritz, Ilan Rubinfeld.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many quality of life (QoL) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures have been developed to assess the effects of disease processes and treatments. Although these instruments are valuable, the process is hampered because of their number and lack of interchangeability.
METHODS: We identified a cohort of patients across a variety of operations within 3-12 months postoperatively. Patients completed the SF-36, measuring eight domains of QoL (physical functioning, role-physical, role-emotional, bodily pain, vitality, mental health, social functioning, and general health), plus a health transition item: Compared to one year ago, how would you rate your health in general now?. (1) Much better now than one year ago. (2) Somewhat better now than one year ago. (3) About the same as one year ago. (4) Somewhat worse than one year ago. (5) Much worse than one year ago. Additional data included improvement of preoperative symptoms, the occurrence of any postoperative symptoms, and the occurrence of any postoperative complications.
RESULTS: Of 217 patients, 28 % were much better, 28 % somewhat better, 27 % unchanged, 13 % somewhat worse, and 3 % much worse. The health transition results were associated with all SF-36 domains, preoperative symptom change (p = 0.03) and persistent or new postoperative symptoms (p = 0.001), but not postoperative complications. Patients with persistent or new symptoms postoperatively had worse scores in the role-emotional (p = 0.01), bodily pain (p = 0.05), social functioning (p = 0.02), and mental health (p = 0.009) domains of the SF-36.
CONCLUSIONS: This single, global assessment of health transition may be a promising practical alternative to assess postoperative patient-centered outcomes. Improved patients had better QoL scores, preoperative symptoms elimination, and no operation-related symptoms, but the occurrence of complications did not affect improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22538393     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1634-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  11 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Hospital volume, length of stay, and readmission rates in high-risk surgery.

Authors:  Philip P Goodney; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Emily V A Finlayson; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes?

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Justin B Dimick; Nancy J O Birkmeyer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 4.  Using quality-of-life measurements in clinical practice.

Authors:  Vic Velanovich
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Logistics of collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: an overview and practical examples.

Authors:  Matthias Rose; Andrea Bezjak
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Measuring patients' experiences and outcomes.

Authors:  Nick Black; Crispin Jenkinson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-02

7.  Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey.

Authors:  C A McHorney; M Kosinski; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Accelerating the pace of surgical quality improvement: the power of hospital collaboration.

Authors:  Darrell A Campbell; Michael J Englesbe; James J Kubus; Laurel R S Phillips; Charles J Shanley; Vic Velanovich; Larry R Lloyd; Max C Hutton; Wallace A Arneson; David A Share
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2010-10

9.  Prospects and challenges in using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice.

Authors:  Constance H Fung; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-08-18       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Kathleen N Lohr; Bradley J Zebrack
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  2 in total

1.  Changes in quality of life after elective surgery: an observational study comparing two measures.

Authors:  Vanessa L Kronzer; Michelle R Jerry; Arbi Ben Abdallah; Troy S Wildes; Sherry L McKinnon; Anshuman Sharma; Michael S Avidan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Impact of invasive bladder cancer and orthotopic urinary diversion on general health-related quality of life: An SF-36 survey.

Authors:  Mingying Yang; Haifeng Wang; Jiansong Wang; Minghui Ruan
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-05-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.