Literature DB >> 22538255

Preferences for opt-in and opt-out enrollment and consent models in biobank research: a national survey of Veterans Administration patients.

David Kaufman1, Juli Bollinger, Rachel Dvoskin, Joan Scott.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In 2006, the Department of Veterans Affairs launched the Genomic Medicine Program with the goal of using genomic information to personalize and improve health care for veterans. A step toward this goal is the Million Veteran Program, which aims to enroll a million veterans in a longitudinal cohort study and establish a database with genomic, lifestyle, military-exposure, and health information. Before the launch of the Million Veteran Program, a survey of Department of Veterans Affairs patients was conducted to measure preferences for opt-in and opt-out models of enrollment and consent.
METHODS: An online survey was conducted with a random sample of 451 veterans. The survey described the proposed Million Veteran Program database and asked respondents about the acceptability of opt-in and opt-out models of enrollment. The study examined differences in responses among demographic groups and relationships between beliefs about each model and willingness to participate.
RESULTS: Most respondents were willing to participate under both opt-in (80%) and opt-out (69%) models. Nearly 80% said they would be comfortable providing access to residual clinical samples for research. At least half of respondents did not strongly favor one model over the other; of those who expressed a preference, significantly more people said they would participate in a study using opt-in methods. Stronger preferences for the opt-in approach were expressed among younger patients and Hispanic patients.
CONCLUSION: Support for the study and willingness to participate were high for both enrollment models. The use of an opt-out model could impede recruitment of certain demographic groups, including Hispanic patients and patients under the age of 55 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22538255     DOI: 10.1038/gim.2012.45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  24 in total

1.  Ethical and practical challenges to studying patients who opt out of large-scale biorepository research.

Authors:  S Trent Rosenbloom; Jennifer L Madison; Kyle B Brothers; Erica A Bowton; Ellen Wright Clayton; Bradley A Malin; Dan M Roden; Jill Pulley
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Proposed regulations for research with biospecimens: responses from stakeholders at CTSA consortium institutions.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; Rebecca Anderson; Tom Murray; Laura M Beskow; Karen Maschke; Leona Cuttler
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  Consumer attitudes towards the establishment of a national Australian familial cancer research database by the Inherited Cancer Connect (ICCon) Partnership.

Authors:  Laura Forrest; Gillian Mitchell; Letitia Thrupp; Lara Petelin; Kate Richardson; Lyon Mascarenhas; Mary-Anne Young
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-08-18

4.  Consenting postpartum women for use of routinely collected biospecimens and/or future biospecimen collection.

Authors:  Claudia A Kozinetz; Kathryn Royse; Sarah C Graham; Xiaoying Yu; Jack Moye; Beatrice J Selwyn; Michele R Forman; Chantal Caviness
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2016-02-11

5.  Differences in preferences for models of consent for biobanks between Black and White women.

Authors:  Katherine M Brown; Bettina F Drake; Sarah Gehlert; Leslie E Wolf; James DuBois; Joann Seo; Krista Woodward; Hannah Perkins; Melody S Goodman; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-08-25

6.  Thematic analysis of cardiac care patients' explanations for declining contribution to a genomic research-based biobank.

Authors:  Pamela Holtzclaw Williams; Lynne S Nemeth; Jennifer E Sanner; Lorraine Q Frazier
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.228

7.  Privacy in the Genomic Era.

Authors:  Muhammad Naveed; Erman Ayday; Ellen W Clayton; Jacques Fellay; Carl A Gunter; Jean-Pierre Hubaux; Bradley A Malin; Xiaofeng Wang
Journal:  ACM Comput Surv       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 10.282

8.  Public attitudes regarding the use of electronic health information and residual clinical tissues for research.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; Erin Rothwell; Rebecca Anderson; Louisa A Stark; Joyce Mitchell
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-12-05

9.  The Continuing Evolution of Ethical Standards for Genomic Sequencing in Clinical Care: Restoring Patient Choice.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.718

10.  Disability inclusion in precision medicine research: a first national survey.

Authors:  Maya Sabatello; Ying Chen; Yuan Zhang; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.