Literature DB >> 22537608

Influence of KRAS p.G13D mutation in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab.

Pablo Gajate1, Javier Sastre, Inmaculada Bando, Teresa Alonso, Lourdes Cillero, Julian Sanz, Trinidad Caldés, Eduardo Díaz-Rubio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with activating mutations at codon 12 or 13 of the KRAS gene are currently excluded from treatment with monoclonal antibodies against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), for example, cetuximab. Occasionally, some of these patients benefit from treatment with cetuximab, especially patients with a mutation at codon 13. We conducted an analysis to study the influence of the KRAS p.G13D mutation in patients with mCRC who were treated with cetuximab.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the KRAS mutation status of 110 patients who were treated with cetuximab between September 2003 and October 2008 at Hospital Clínico, San Carlos. We compared progression-free survival, overall survival, and response rate according to KRAS mutation status.
RESULTS: Patients with mutations at codon 13 compared with those with other KRAS mutations showed no statistically significant differences in progression-free survival (4.96 months [95% CI, 3.04-6.89 months] vs. 3.10 months [95% CI, 1.58-4.61 months]; hazard ratio [HR] 0.88 [95% CI, 44-1.75]; P = .72) and overall survival (8.2 months [95% CI, 4.2-12.1 months] vs. 14.6 months [95% CI, 8.0-21.2 months]; HR 0.50 [95% CI, 0.23-1.09]; P = .084). Patients with KRAS wild-type tumors have a longer progression-free survival (7.30 months [95% CI, 4.48-10.12 months]; HR 0.46 [95% CI, 0.23-0.91]; P = .025) and overall survival (19.0 months [95% CI, 10.2-27.8 months]; HR 0.32 [95% CI, 0.15-0.69]; P = .004) than patients with p.G13D-mutated tumors. Differences in the response rate were not observed between groups.
CONCLUSION: Patients with mCRC and mutation at codon 13 of the KRAS gene do not appear to benefit from treatment with cetuximab. These results support the current clinical practice.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22537608     DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2012.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer        ISSN: 1533-0028            Impact factor:   4.481


  15 in total

Review 1.  Current evidence and controversies in the incorporation of biologics for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kristen K Ciombor; Richard M Goldberg
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2014-09-09

Review 2.  Sequencing of treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: where to fit the target.

Authors:  Sally Temraz; Deborah Mukherji; Ali Shamseddine
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Patient and tumor characteristics and BRAF and KRAS mutations in colon cancer, NCCTG/Alliance N0147.

Authors:  Wilson I Gonsalves; Michelle R Mahoney; Daniel J Sargent; Garth D Nelson; Steven R Alberts; Frank A Sinicrope; Richard M Goldberg; Paul J Limburg; Stephen N Thibodeau; Axel Grothey; Joleen M Hubbard; Emily Chan; Suresh Nair; Jeffrey L Berenberg; Robert R McWilliams
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Comparison of COBAS 4800 KRAS, TaqMan PCR and high resolution melting PCR assays for the detection of KRAS somatic mutations in formalin-fixed paraffin embedded colorectal carcinomas.

Authors:  Alexandre Harlé; Benoit Busser; Marie Rouyer; Valentin Harter; Pascal Genin; Agnès Leroux; Jean-Louis Merlin
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 5.  Prognostic and Predictive Value of RAS Gene Mutations in Colorectal Cancer: Moving Beyond KRAS Exon 2.

Authors:  Nele Boeckx; Marc Peeters; Guy Van Camp; Patrick Pauwels; Ken Op de Beeck; Vanessa Deschoolmeester
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  KRAS mutations by digital PCR in circulating tumor cells isolated from the mesenteric vein are associated with residual disease and overall survival in resected colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Yan Li; Mariano Monzo; Isabel Moreno; Francisco Martinez-Rodenas; Raquel Hernandez; Joan J Castellano; Jordi Canals; Bing Han; Carmen Muñoz; Alfons Navarro
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Computational analysis of KRAS mutations: implications for different effects on the KRAS p.G12D and p.G13D mutations.

Authors:  Chih-Chieh Chen; Tze-Kiong Er; Yen-Yi Liu; Jenn-Kang Hwang; Maria Jesus Barrio; Maximiliano Rodrigo; Enrique Garcia-Toro; Marta Herreros-Villanueva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Colorectal cancer in Chinese patients: current and emerging treatment options.

Authors:  Leung Li; Brigette By Ma
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  Mechanisms of resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ben Zhao; Lu Wang; Hong Qiu; Mingsheng Zhang; Li Sun; Ping Peng; Qianqian Yu; Xianglin Yuan
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-17

Review 10.  Prognostic value of KRAS codon 13 gene mutation for overall survival in colorectal cancer: Direct and indirect comparison meta-analysis.

Authors:  Min Seob Kwak; Jae Myung Cha; Jin Young Yoon; Jung Won Jeon; Hyun Phil Shin; Hye Jung Chang; Hyung Kyung Kim; Kwang Ro Joo; Joung Il Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.