C Curtin1, E Kennedy, P A Henschke. 1. The Australian Wine Research Institute, Glen Osmond, Adelaide, SA, Australia. chris.curtin@awri.com.au
Abstract
AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine sulphite tolerance for a large number of Dekkera bruxellensis isolates and evaluate the relationship between this phenotype and previously assigned genotype markers. METHODS AND RESULTS: A published microplate-based method for evaluation of yeast growth in the presence of sulphite was benchmarked against culturability following sulphite treatment, for the D. bruxellensis type strain (CBS 74) and a reference wine isolate (AWRI 1499). This method was used to estimate maximal sulphite tolerance for 41 D. bruxellensis isolates, which was found to vary over a fivefold range. Significant differences in sulphite tolerance were observed when isolates were grouped according to previously assigned genotypes and ribotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Variable sulphite tolerance for the wine spoilage yeast D. bruxellensis can be linked to genotype markers. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Strategies to minimize risk of wine spoilage by D. bruxellensis must take into account at least a threefold range in effective sulphite concentration that is dependent upon the genotype group(s) present. The isolates characterized in this study will be a useful resource for establishing the mechanisms conferring sulphite tolerance for this industrially important yeast species.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine sulphite tolerance for a large number of Dekkera bruxellensis isolates and evaluate the relationship between this phenotype and previously assigned genotype markers. METHODS AND RESULTS: A published microplate-based method for evaluation of yeast growth in the presence of sulphite was benchmarked against culturability following sulphite treatment, for the D. bruxellensis type strain (CBS 74) and a reference wine isolate (AWRI 1499). This method was used to estimate maximal sulphite tolerance for 41 D. bruxellensis isolates, which was found to vary over a fivefold range. Significant differences in sulphite tolerance were observed when isolates were grouped according to previously assigned genotypes and ribotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Variable sulphite tolerance for the wine spoilage yeastD. bruxellensis can be linked to genotype markers. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Strategies to minimize risk of wine spoilage by D. bruxellensis must take into account at least a threefold range in effective sulphite concentration that is dependent upon the genotype group(s) present. The isolates characterized in this study will be a useful resource for establishing the mechanisms conferring sulphite tolerance for this industrially important yeast species.
Authors: Alice Cibrario; Marta Avramova; Maria Dimopoulou; Maura Magani; Cécile Miot-Sertier; Albert Mas; Maria C Portillo; Patricia Ballestra; Warren Albertin; Isabelle Masneuf-Pomarede; Marguerite Dols-Lafargue Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-12-18 Impact factor: 3.240