OBJECTIVE: To explore possible benefits of a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agent for autistic symptoms based on postmortem observation of nAChR abnormalities (deficientα4β2 nAChRs, excess α7 nAChRs) in brains of patients with autism. METHOD:Mecamylamine, because of its safety record in children with other disorders, was chosen for this first exploration. Twenty children with autism spectrum disorderage 4-12 years were randomly assigned for 14 weeks to placebo (n=8) or mecamylamine (n=12) in ascending fixed doses: 0.5 mg/day for 6 weeks, 2.5 mg for 2 weeks, then 5 mg/day for 6 weeks. Improvement was rated by a blinded independent evaluator. Because of small sample, data analysis was descriptive. RESULTS:Eighteen participants (10mecamylamine, 8 placebo) completed the study. All doses were well tolerated; the only side effect of note was constipation (50% compared with 25% of placebo group). Three children had clinically nonsignificant electrocardiographic QT prolongation. Both groups showed modest to moderate improvement, but differences between groups were negligible. On the primary outcome measure, the Ohio Autism Clinical Impressions Scale, 90% of the active treatment group showed improvement at some point (but only 40% sustained it), compared with 62% on placebo. Of the four in active treatment that sustained improvement, three had a maximum dose of 0.13-0.15 mg/kg/day, while those who regressed had doses ≥0.18 mg/kg/day. Graphed means suggested better outcome with lower mg/kg and longer medication duration. Four parents spontaneously reported reduced hyperactivity and irritability and better verbalization and continued mecamylamine at their own expense. CONCLUSION:Mecamylamine appeared to be safe, but not very effective in autism. The suggestion of better results at lower doses and longer exposure warrants consideration for future trials. The next step would be exploration of a more specific α4β2 nAChR agonist, such as varenicline.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To explore possible benefits of a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agent for autistic symptoms based on postmortem observation of nAChR abnormalities (deficient α4β2 nAChRs, excess α7 nAChRs) in brains of patients with autism. METHOD:Mecamylamine, because of its safety record in children with other disorders, was chosen for this first exploration. Twenty children with autism spectrum disorder age 4-12 years were randomly assigned for 14 weeks to placebo (n=8) or mecamylamine (n=12) in ascending fixed doses: 0.5 mg/day for 6 weeks, 2.5 mg for 2 weeks, then 5 mg/day for 6 weeks. Improvement was rated by a blinded independent evaluator. Because of small sample, data analysis was descriptive. RESULTS: Eighteen participants (10 mecamylamine, 8 placebo) completed the study. All doses were well tolerated; the only side effect of note was constipation (50% compared with 25% of placebo group). Three children had clinically nonsignificant electrocardiographic QT prolongation. Both groups showed modest to moderate improvement, but differences between groups were negligible. On the primary outcome measure, the Ohio Autism Clinical Impressions Scale, 90% of the active treatment group showed improvement at some point (but only 40% sustained it), compared with 62% on placebo. Of the four in active treatment that sustained improvement, three had a maximum dose of 0.13-0.15 mg/kg/day, while those who regressed had doses ≥0.18 mg/kg/day. Graphed means suggested better outcome with lower mg/kg and longer medication duration. Four parents spontaneously reported reduced hyperactivity and irritability and better verbalization and continued mecamylamine at their own expense. CONCLUSION:Mecamylamine appeared to be safe, but not very effective in autism. The suggestion of better results at lower doses and longer exposure warrants consideration for future trials. The next step would be exploration of a more specific α4β2 nAChR agonist, such as varenicline.
Authors: C R Breese; M J Marks; J Logel; C E Adams; B Sullivan; A C Collins; S Leonard Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: T Mochizuki; V L Villemagne; U Scheffel; R F Dannals; P Finley; Y Zhan; H N Wagner; J L Musachio Journal: Synapse Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 2.562
Authors: L Eugene Arnold; Benedetto Vitiello; Christopher McDougle; Larry Scahill; Bhavik Shah; Nilda M Gonzalez; Shirley Chuang; Mark Davies; Jill Hollway; Michael G Aman; Pegeen Cronin; Kathleen Koenig; Arlene E Kohn; Donald J McMahon; Elaine Tierney Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Alan S Lewis; Gerrit Ian van Schalkwyk; Mayra Ortiz Lopez; Fred R Volkmar; Marina R Picciotto; Denis G Sukhodolsky Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2018-08
Authors: Tatiana M Kazdoba; Prescott T Leach; Mu Yang; Jill L Silverman; Marjorie Solomon; Jacqueline N Crawley Journal: Curr Top Behav Neurosci Date: 2016
Authors: Li Wang; Luis E F Almeida; Nicholas A Spornick; Nicholas Kenyon; Sayuri Kamimura; Alfia Khaibullina; Mehdi Nouraie; Zenaide M N Quezado Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2015-09-04 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Justin R Nickell; Vladimir P Grinevich; Kiran B Siripurapu; Andrew M Smith; Linda P Dwoskin Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 3.533