Literature DB >> 22536858

Pain ratings by patients and their providers of radionucleotide injection for breast cancer lymphatic mapping.

Jason S Radowsky1, Lyndsay Baines, Robin S Howard, Craig D Shriver, Chester C Buckenmaier, Alexander Stojadinovic.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disparity between patient report and physician perception of pain from radiotracer injection for sentinel node biopsy is thought to center on the severity of the intervention, ethnic composition of population queried, and socioeconomic factors.
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were, first, to explore agreement between physicians' and their breast cancer patients' pain assessment during subareolar radionucleotide injection; and second, to evaluate potential ethnic differences in ratings.
METHODS: A trial was conducted, from January 2006 to April 2009, where 140 breast cancer patients were randomly assigned to standard topical lidocaine-4% cream and 99mTc-sulfur colloid injection, or to one of three other groups: placebo cream and 99mTc-sulfur colloid injection containing NaHCO3, 1% lidocaine, or NaHCO3 + 1% lidocaine. Providers and patients completed numeric pain scales (0-10) immediately after injection.
RESULTS: Patients and providers rated pain similarly over the entire cohort (median, 3 vs 2, P = 0.15). Patients rated pain statistically significantly higher than physicians in the standard (6 vs 5, P = 0.045) and placebo + NaHCO3 (5 vs 4, P = 0.032) groups. No significant difference in scores existed between all African Americans and their physicians (3 vs 4, P = 0.27).
CONCLUSION: Patient-physician pain assessment congruence over the less painful injections and their statistically similar scores with the more painful methods suggests the importance of utilizing the least painful method possible. Providers tended to underestimate patients with the highest pain ratings-those in the greatest analgesic need. Lack of statistical difference between African American and physician scores may reflect the equal-access-to-care over the entire patient cohort, supporting the conclusion that socioeconomic factors may lie at the heart of previously reported discrepancies. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22536858     DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01374.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Med        ISSN: 1526-2375            Impact factor:   3.750


  4 in total

1.  Creating meaningful cut-scores for Neuro-QOL measures of fatigue, physical functioning, and sleep disturbance using standard setting with patients and providers.

Authors:  Karon F Cook; David E Victorson; David Cella; Benjamin D Schalet; Deborah Miller
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of sentinel node identification is maintained with the addition of local lidocaine and subareolar radioactive colloid injection.

Authors:  Vered Stearns; Amanda Blackford; Jill Kessler; Eman Sbaity; Mehran Habibi; Nagi Khouri; Cindy S Lee; Evelyn May; Stacie Jeter; Camila Sahebi; Christina Shehata; Karineh Tarpinian; Lisa Jacobs; David Eisner
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Establishing clinical meaning and defining important differences for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) measures in juvenile idiopathic arthritis using standard setting with patients, parents, and providers.

Authors:  Esi M Morgan; Constance A Mara; Bin Huang; Kimberly Barnett; Adam C Carle; Jennifer E Farrell; Karon F Cook
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Patient perception of pain versus observed pain behavior during a standardized electrodiagnostic test.

Authors:  Josh Verson; Andrew J Haig; Danielle Sandella; Karen S J Yamakawa; Zachary London; Christy Tomkins-Lane
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.217

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.