Literature DB >> 24895249

Patient perception of pain versus observed pain behavior during a standardized electrodiagnostic test.

Josh Verson1, Andrew J Haig, Danielle Sandella, Karen S J Yamakawa, Zachary London, Christy Tomkins-Lane.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Clinicians often assume that observations of pain behavior are adequate for assessment of patient pain perception during procedures. This has not been tested during a standardized electrodiagnostic experience.
METHODS: During a prospective trial including extensive, standardized electrodiagnostic testing on persons with lumbar stenosis, vascular claudication, and asymptomatic volunteers, the subjects and an observer rated levels of pain.
RESULTS: In 60 subjects, observers significantly under-rated pain (Visual Analog Scale 3.17 ± 2.23 vs. 4.38 ± 2.01, t = -4.577, df = 59, P < 0.001). Perceived pain during testing related to bodily pain as measured by the visual analog, McGill, Pain Disability, and Quebec scales, but not age, duration of symptoms, Tampa kinesiphobia, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale, or SF-36 health quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS: Persons with worse pain syndromes may perceive more pain during testing than others. Clinicians and researchers should understand that patients may have more pain than they recognize.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  back pain; electrodiagnosis; electromyography; experimental pain; pain

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24895249      PMCID: PMC4254897          DOI: 10.1002/mus.24308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscle Nerve        ISSN: 0148-639X            Impact factor:   3.217


  27 in total

1.  Anxiety and pain in surgical patients.

Authors:  A Martinez-Urrutia
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1975-08

2.  Analgesia in electromyography.

Authors:  W J LAJOIE
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 3.  Patients' anticipation of pain and pain-related side effects, and their perception of pain as a result of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances.

Authors:  A R Firestone; P A Scheurer; W B Bürgin
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Differences in pain perception in women using concentric and monopolar needles.

Authors:  Janet M Balbierz; Jack H Petajan; Stephen C Alder; Sarah A Vlach
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Brief cognitive and relaxation training increases tolerance for a painful clinical electromyographic examination.

Authors:  R M Kaplan; G Metzger; C Jablecki
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 4.312

6.  The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods.

Authors:  Ronald Melzack
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  [Do physicians overestimate effects of acupuncture treatment?].

Authors:  M Lungenhausen; H G Endres; P Kukuk; C Schaub; C Maier; M Zenz
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.107

8.  Pain perception in clinical electromyography.

Authors:  B M Gans; G H Kraft
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI).

Authors:  R D Kerns; D C Turk; T E Rudy
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Information effect on the perception of pain during electromyography.

Authors:  J K Richardson; J E Evans; J H Warner
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.