Literature DB >> 22535651

Accuracy of transvaginal sonography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance-colonography for the presurgical staging of deep infiltrating endometriosis.

A Vimercati1, M T Achilarre, A Scardapane, F Lorusso, O Ceci, G Mangiatordi, G Angelelli, B Van Herendael, L Selvaggi, S Bettocchi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the accuracy of transvaginal sonography (TVS) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance-colonography (CE-MR-C) for the presurgical assessment of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE).
METHODS: Ninety women were enrolled prospectively for suspicion of DIE. All patients underwent TVS and CE-MR-C, with each operator blinded to the results of the other exam, before laparoscopy. The sites of DIE examined by both imaging techniques were: rectovaginal septum, pouch of Douglas, uterosacral ligaments, vesicouterine pouch, bowel, bladder and vagina. The presence of adhesions and the involvement of adnexa and of a previous abdominal scar, when there was clinical suspicion, were also evaluated. TVS and CE-MR-C findings were compared with laparoscopic and histological results.
RESULTS: Endometriosis was confirmed by laparoscopy in 95.6% (86/90) of cases. In 82.2% (74/90) of patients there was DIE. The global accuracy for TVS in the detection of DIE was 89.2%, sensitivity was 81.1%, specificity was 94.2%, positive predictive value was 89.6%, negative predictive value was 89.0%, the positive likelihood ratio was 13.9 and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.2. For CE-MR-C, these values were 87.2%, 71.1%, 97.1%, 93.7%, 84.6%, 24.4 and 0.3, respectively. CE-MR-C allowed diagnosis of all cases of bowel involvement; the accuracy for infiltration and stenosis was 100%. The accuracy of TVS for rectosigmoid nodules was 91.1% and that for infiltration was 88.9%.
CONCLUSIONS: Both TVS and CE-MR-C showed satisfactory results for the presurgical assessment of DIE. TVS appears to be a powerful, simple, feasible, cost-effective tool for preoperative staging of DIE. CE-MR-C is an 'X-ray free' technique, which could be reserved for cases with deep infiltrating rectosigmoid lesions and for the prediction of stenosis and involvement of the upper part of the colon and small intestine.
Copyright © 2012 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22535651     DOI: 10.1002/uog.11179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  10 in total

Review 1.  Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.

Authors:  Vicki Nisenblat; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Cindy Farquhar; Neil Johnson; M Louise Hull
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-26

Review 2.  MRI for the diagnosis and staging of deeply infiltrating endometriosis: a national survey of BSGE accredited endometriosis centres and review of the literature.

Authors:  Marianne Wild; Shikha Pandhi; John Rendle; Ian Swift; Emmanuel Ofuasia
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Standard high-resolution pelvic MRI vs. low-resolution pelvic MRI in the evaluation of deep infiltrating endometriosis.

Authors:  Arnaldo Scardapane; Filomenamila Lorusso; Marco Scioscia; Annunziata Ferrante; Amato Antonio Stabile Ianora; Giuseppe Angelelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Magnetic Resonance Colonography May Predict the Need for Bowel Resection in Colorectal Endometriosis.

Authors:  Arnaldo Scardapane; Filomenamila Lorusso; Mariantonietta Francavilla; Stefano Bettocchi; Fabiana Divina Fascilla; Giuseppe Angelelli; Marco Scioscia
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Accuracy of transvaginal sonography versus magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ana Paula Carvalhal Moura; Helizabet Salomão Abdalla Ayroza Ribeiro; Wanderley Marques Bernardo; Ricardo Simões; Ulysses S Torres; Giuseppe D'Ippolito; Marc Bazot; Paulo Augusto Ayrosa Galvão Ribeiro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  MRI in the Diagnosis of Endometriosis and Related Diseases.

Authors:  Aki Kido; Yuki Himoto; Yusaku Moribata; Yasuhisa Kurata; Yuji Nakamoto
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Evaluation of the usefulness of the MRI jelly method for diagnosing complete cul-de-sac obliteration.

Authors:  Iwaho Kikuchi; Ryohei Kuwatsuru; Kana Yamazaki; Jun Kumakiri; Yoichi Aoki; Satoru Takeda
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound and MRI in the Mapping of Deep Pelvic Endometriosis Using the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) Consensus.

Authors:  T Indrielle-Kelly; F Frühauf; M Fanta; A Burgetova; D Lavu; P Dundr; D Cibula; D Fischerova
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Imaging Modalities for Diagnosis of Deep Pelvic Endometriosis: Comparison between Trans-Vaginal Sonography, Rectal Endoscopy Sonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. A Head-to-Head Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Marco Noventa; Marco Scioscia; Michele Schincariol; Francesco Cavallin; Giovanni Pontrelli; Bruna Virgilio; Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Antonio Simone Laganà; Francesco Dessole; Erich Cosmi; Donato D'Antona; Alessandra Andrisani; Carlo Saccardi; Amerigo Vitagliano; Guido Ambrosini
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-17

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance imaging for deep infiltrating endometriosis: current concepts, imaging technique and key findings.

Authors:  Filomenamila Lorusso; Marco Scioscia; Dino Rubini; Amato Antonio Stabile Ianora; Doriana Scardigno; Carla Leuci; Michele De Ceglie; Angela Sardaro; Nicola Lucarelli; Arnaldo Scardapane
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-07-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.