Literature DB >> 22534145

Awareness of methylmercury in fish and fish consumption among pregnant and postpartum women and women of childbearing age in the United States.

Amy M Lando1, Sara B Fein, Conrad J Choinière.   

Abstract

In 2004, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reissued joint advice recommending that pregnant women, nursing mothers, young children, and women who may become pregnant not consume fish high in mercury such as shark, swordfish, king mackerel, and tilefish, and not consume more than 12 ounces (340.2g) of other lower mercury fish per week. These groups were encouraged to eat up to 12 ounces (340.2g) of low mercury fish per week to get the health benefits of fish. Using a survey of 1286 pregnant women, 522 postpartum women, and a control group of 1349 non-pregnant/non-postpartum women of childbearing age, this study evaluated awareness of mercury as a problem in food and examined fish consumption levels across groups using regression analysis. We also compared awareness of mercury as a problem in food to awareness of Listeria, dioxins and PCBs. We found that the majority of all 3 groups of women were aware of mercury and that nearly all women in all 3 groups limited consumption consistent with the advice; they ate less than 340.2g (12 oz) of fish per week and no high mercury fish. Compared with the control group, pregnant and postpartum women were more likely to be aware of mercury as a problem in food, and pregnant women ate less total fish and were less likely to eat fish, to eat more than 340.2g (12 oz) of fish, and to eat high mercury fish. However, all groups ate much less than the recommended 340.2g (12 oz) of low mercury fish per week for optimum health benefits. Among women who ate fish, the median intake of total fish was 51.6 g/wk (1.8 oz/wk), 71.4 g/wk (2.5 oz/wk), and 85.3 g/wk (3.0 oz/wk) for the pregnant, postpartum, and control groups, respectively. Thus, it appears that the targeted groups of women were more aware of mercury and were eating fish within the FDA/EPA guidelines, but these women may be missing the health benefits to themselves and their children of eating a sufficient amount of fish. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22534145     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2012.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  10 in total

1.  What do Pregnant Women Know About the Healthy Eating Guidelines for Pregnancy? A Web-Based Questionnaire.

Authors:  Amelia Lee; Regina Belski; Jessica Radcliffe; Michelle Newton
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-10

2.  Total Long-Chain n-3 Fatty Acid Intake and Food Sources in the United States Compared to Recommended Intakes: NHANES 2003-2008.

Authors:  Chesney K Richter; Kate J Bowen; Dariush Mozaffarian; Penny M Kris-Etherton; Ann C Skulas-Ray
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 1.880

3.  Executive summary: Evaluating the evidence base to support the inclusion of infants and children from birth to 24 mo of age in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans--"the B-24 Project".

Authors:  Daniel J Raiten; Ramkripa Raghavan; Alexandra Porter; Julie E Obbagy; Joanne M Spahn
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Fish pollutants MeHg and Aroclor cause permanent structural damage in male gonads and kidneys after prepubertal exposure.

Authors:  Mariana S Garcia; Dulce Helena J Constantino; Ana P G Silva; Juliana E Perobelli
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Hair mercury and risk assessment for consumption of contaminated seafood in residents from the coast of the Persian Gulf, Iran.

Authors:  Narjes Okati; Abbas Esmaili-Sari
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Mercury in fish and adverse reproductive outcomes: results from South Carolina.

Authors:  James B Burch; Sara Wagner Robb; Robin Puett; Bo Cai; Rebecca Wilkerson; Wilfried Karmaus; John Vena; Erik Svendsen
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.918

Review 7.  The 2014 FDA assessment of commercial fish: practical considerations for improved dietary guidance.

Authors:  Jennifer McGuire; Jason Kaplan; John Lapolla; Rima Kleiner
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.271

8.  Regional and temporal trends in blood mercury concentrations and fish consumption in women of child bearing Age in the united states using NHANES data from 1999-2010.

Authors:  Leanne K Cusack; Ellen Smit; Molly L Kile; Anna K Harding
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 9.  An abundance of seafood consumption studies presents new opportunities to evaluate effects on neurocognitive development.

Authors:  Philip Spiller; Joseph R Hibbeln; Gary Myers; Gretchen Vannice; Jean Golding; Michael A Crawford; J J Strain; Sonja L Connor; J Thomas Brenna; Penny Kris-Etherton; Bruce J Holub; William S Harris; Bill Lands; Robert K McNamara; Michael F Tlusty; Norman Salem; Susan E Carlson
Journal:  Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 4.006

10.  The risk of mercury exposure to the people consuming fish from Lake Phewa, Nepal.

Authors:  Devna Singh Thapa; Chhatra Mani Sharma; Shichang Kang; Mika Sillanpää
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.